Bug#440489: Provides of gcc-4.2
close 440489 thanks Amir Tabatabaei writes: > reopen 440489 > thanks > > This has not been solved and I see no reason why close it. wrong; just read the comments: > gcc-4.2 did never contain the doc files, so it cannot provide > gcc-4.2-doc. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#440489: Provides of gcc-4.2
reopen 440489 thanks This has not been solved and I see no reason why close it. Regards, Amir -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#440489: Provides of gcc-4.2
> Amir Tabatabaei writes: > > Hi Matthias, > > > > On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 01:43 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > Andreas Janssen writes: > > > > Package: gcc-doc > > > > Version: 4:4.1.1.nf3 > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > gcc-4.2 /suggests/ gcc-4.2-doc, but does not /provide/ that > > > > package. > > > > > > that's correct, gcc-4.2 does not include the doc files. > > > > Why did you close this bug? I don't see any solution right now? > > gcc-4.2 did never contain the doc files, so it cannot provide > gcc-4.2-doc. But bug is not against gcc-4.2 but against gcc-doc ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#440489: Provides of gcc-4.2
Amir Tabatabaei writes: > Hi Matthias, > > On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 01:43 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Andreas Janssen writes: > > > Package: gcc-doc > > > Version: 4:4.1.1.nf3 > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > gcc-4.2 /suggests/ gcc-4.2-doc, but does not /provide/ that package. > > > > that's correct, gcc-4.2 does not include the doc files. > > Why did you close this bug? I don't see any solution right now? gcc-4.2 did never contain the doc files, so it cannot provide gcc-4.2-doc. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#440489: Provides of gcc-4.2
Hi Matthias, On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 01:43 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Andreas Janssen writes: > > Package: gcc-doc > > Version: 4:4.1.1.nf3 > > > > Hi > > > > gcc-4.2 /suggests/ gcc-4.2-doc, but does not /provide/ that package. > > that's correct, gcc-4.2 does not include the doc files. Why did you close this bug? I don't see any solution right now? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#440489: Provides of gcc-4.2
Nikita V. Youshchenko writes: > > > Currently, gcc-4.2-doc *is* in main. Does this mean that FDL paranoia > > > has gone to past, or gcc-4.2-doc is in main just in error - I don't > > > know. But depending on this, either non-free and contrib packages > > > should be updated, or gcc-doc should be provided by gcc-defaults (as > > > it was some time ago). > > > > > > Matthias, could you please comment on this? > > > > please see my comment in #442445 > > from #442445: > > won't fix this before the 4.2.3 and 4.3.0 releases > > Not very verbose :) > > Could you please answer what is going to be changed at the time of > 4.2.3/4.3.0? the man pages and -doc packages won't be built anymore with the final 4.2.3/4.3.0 releases. > Will you handle documentation issues yourself? I won't touch the non-free -doc packages. > Or my non-free/contrib packages are will be needed again? most likely. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#440489: Provides of gcc-4.2
> > Currently, gcc-4.2-doc *is* in main. Does this mean that FDL paranoia > > has gone to past, or gcc-4.2-doc is in main just in error - I don't > > know. But depending on this, either non-free and contrib packages > > should be updated, or gcc-doc should be provided by gcc-defaults (as > > it was some time ago). > > > > Matthias, could you please comment on this? > > please see my comment in #442445 from #442445: > won't fix this before the 4.2.3 and 4.3.0 releases Not very verbose :) Could you please answer what is going to be changed at the time of 4.2.3/4.3.0? Will you handle documentation issues yourself? Or my non-free/contrib packages are will be needed again? Nikita P.S. 2debian-gcc subscribers: if whoever is interested in non-free/contrib documentation packages, you are welcome either to co-maintain or to take over. pgphuoCt1L6WM.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#440489: Provides of gcc-4.2
Nikita V. Youshchenko writes: > > > Package: gcc-doc > > Version: 4:4.1.1.nf3 > > > > Hi > > > > gcc-4.2 /suggests/ gcc-4.2-doc, but does not /provide/ that package. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> LANG=C apt-cache policy gcc-4.2 > gcc-4.2: > Installed: (none) > Candidate: 4.2.1-4 > Version table: > 4.2.1-5 0 > 600 http://blacky unstable/main Packages > 4.2.1-4 0 > 620 http://blacky testing/main Packages > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> apt-cache show gcc-4.2-doc | egrep 'Source|Section' > Section: doc > Source: gcc-4.2 > Section: doc > Source: gcc-4.2 > > So gcc-4.2-doc is really built from gcc-4.2 source. > > Short before etch, there was all that story about removing FDL docs from > main. And it very looked like etch was going to be released without gcc > documentation even in non-free. Because availability of compiler > documentation is very important for my personal workflow, I've created > gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg [non-free] and gcc-doc-defaults [contrib] packages, > that provided the documentation. > > Currently, gcc-4.2-doc *is* in main. Does this mean that FDL paranoia has > gone to past, or gcc-4.2-doc is in main just in error - I don't know. But > depending on this, either non-free and contrib packages should be updated, > or gcc-doc should be provided by gcc-defaults (as it was some time ago). > > Matthias, could you please comment on this? please see my comment in #442445 Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#440489: Provides of gcc-4.2
> Package: gcc-doc > Version: 4:4.1.1.nf3 > > Hi > > gcc-4.2 /suggests/ gcc-4.2-doc, but does not /provide/ that package. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> LANG=C apt-cache policy gcc-4.2 gcc-4.2: Installed: (none) Candidate: 4.2.1-4 Version table: 4.2.1-5 0 600 http://blacky unstable/main Packages 4.2.1-4 0 620 http://blacky testing/main Packages [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> apt-cache show gcc-4.2-doc | egrep 'Source|Section' Section: doc Source: gcc-4.2 Section: doc Source: gcc-4.2 So gcc-4.2-doc is really built from gcc-4.2 source. Short before etch, there was all that story about removing FDL docs from main. And it very looked like etch was going to be released without gcc documentation even in non-free. Because availability of compiler documentation is very important for my personal workflow, I've created gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg [non-free] and gcc-doc-defaults [contrib] packages, that provided the documentation. Currently, gcc-4.2-doc *is* in main. Does this mean that FDL paranoia has gone to past, or gcc-4.2-doc is in main just in error - I don't know. But depending on this, either non-free and contrib packages should be updated, or gcc-doc should be provided by gcc-defaults (as it was some time ago). Matthias, could you please comment on this? Nikita pgp4O4Z8k7iCe.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#440489: Provides of gcc-4.2
Package: gcc-doc Version: 4:4.1.1.nf3 Hi gcc-4.2 /suggests/ gcc-4.2-doc, but does not /provide/ that package. regards Andreas Janssen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
