Bug#443189: PTS: 443189: please use jeroen's buildd pages
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 10:08:01PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > Sorry, should have repeated the URLs from the original bug report: Thanks to all who provided the links. > Frankly I'd like to see it replace some of the official buildd > interface, but getting the PTS/DDPO to use it for the More link is a > good first start. On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:12:20PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > the shortcoming I see is that Jeroen's pages only display a package at > a time, while igloo's can display all packages of a given maintainer. > But I really love Jeroen's. Ok, so I've no objection in changing the "more" link so that it points to Jeroen's. Please clone/reassign this bug as appropriate to ask for the update of the "more" link in the DDPO (sorry, but I now nothing about that code), for the sake of consistency. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ... now what? [EMAIL PROTECTED],cs.unibo.it,debian.org} -<%>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ?/\All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema\/right keys at the right time signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#443189: PTS: 443189: please use jeroen's buildd pages
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:50:40PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 11:07:56AM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > > I'd also like to see the PTS using jeroen's buildd status page instead > > of igloo's buildd status page since it is more useful. > > URL please > > Anyhow the current "ports" link points to > http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=PACKAGE, title of > such pages is "Jeroen's buildd information page". Chances are that this > is already what you needed. > If not, please compare the informative content of what you are proposing > with igloo's and give us a hint about whether yours can replace igloo's. I guess he want the "more" link that points to: http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?packages=$package to: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=$package Which I would vote for too. -- "rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#443189: PTS: 443189: please use jeroen's buildd pages
On 07/02/2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > URL please Random examples: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=ecj http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?packages=ecj notice the “for” column, the links to the build logs, the display of the failed builds, P-a-s entries (if any, I don't have examples by hand), etc. > If not, please compare the informative content of what you are > proposing with igloo's and give us a hint about whether yours can > replace igloo's. the shortcoming I see is that Jeroen's pages only display a package at a time, while igloo's can display all packages of a given maintainer. But I really love Jeroen's. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois pgp4Q6BDZcbbX.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#443189: PTS: 443189: please use jeroen's buildd pages
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 13:50 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > URL please Sorry, should have repeated the URLs from the original bug report: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/ http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=&suite=unstable > Anyhow the current "ports" link points to > http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=PACKAGE, title of > such pages is "Jeroen's buildd information page". Chances are that this > is already what you needed. That looks like the same script. > If not, please compare the informative content of what you are proposing > with igloo's and give us a hint about whether yours can replace igloo's. It provides better status information, more information (dep-waits/etc) and nice little extracts of build logs or reasons for failing (including bug numbers). It also runs on the buildd host so probably has more up-to-date & accurate information. It supports multiple packages, but doesn't seem to support searching by maintainer email address and doesn't show a summary of numbers of arches in each state. Frankly I'd like to see it replace some of the official buildd interface, but getting the PTS/DDPO to use it for the More link is a good first start. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#443189: PTS: 443189: please use jeroen's buildd pages
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 11:07:56AM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > I'd also like to see the PTS using jeroen's buildd status page instead > of igloo's buildd status page since it is more useful. URL please Anyhow the current "ports" link points to http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=PACKAGE, title of such pages is "Jeroen's buildd information page". Chances are that this is already what you needed. If not, please compare the informative content of what you are proposing with igloo's and give us a hint about whether yours can replace igloo's. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ... now what? [EMAIL PROTECTED],cs.unibo.it,debian.org} -<%>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ?/\All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema\/right keys at the right time signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#443189: PTS: 443189: please use jeroen's buildd pages
Package: qa.debian.org Followup-For: Bug # I'd also like to see the PTS using jeroen's buildd status page instead of igloo's buildd status page since it is more useful. Is there any reason not to make this change or anything holding it up? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
