Bug#444334: libmowgli packaging
Hi, On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 01:44:42AM +0200, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: I already have a working package and plan to upload it soon. why didn't you file an ITP, then? I started preparing a package with my ITP and sent it to my sponsor already, so that he checks this package and uploads it, if it is ready. Could you please let me care of this package, as the work is already done and because I'm used to work with the atheme guys (audacious maintainer). Hmm. I don't want to do that, as the work on my side is already done as well. Its your fault that double effort has been done, because you did not file an ITP. But I don't want to search someone to blame. Probably it would help us both to join our efforts and team-maintain the package? I know that libmowgli is needed for (upcoming) versions of audacious (in fact that is the reason why I packaged it) and so I see that you have a reason for maintaining the package. Its the first library I am packaging so I could eventually benefit from this coorperation. What do you think? Regards, Patrick
Bug#444334: libmowgli packaging
Patrick Schoenfeld a écrit : Hi, On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 01:44:42AM +0200, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: I already have a working package and plan to upload it soon. why didn't you file an ITP, then? I started preparing a package with my ITP and sent it to my sponsor already, so that he checks this package and uploads it, if it is ready. I did, but didn't checked if another one was already open ;) Please ask you sponsor to do not upload now. We'll merge both work. Could you please let me care of this package, as the work is already done and because I'm used to work with the atheme guys (audacious maintainer). Hmm. I don't want to do that, as the work on my side is already done as well. Its your fault that double effort has been done, because you did not file an ITP. But I don't want to search someone to blame. Probably it would help us both to join our efforts and team-maintain the package? I know that libmowgli is needed for (upcoming) versions of audacious (in fact that is the reason why I packaged it) and so I see that you have a reason for maintaining the package. Its the first library I am packaging so I could eventually benefit from this coorperation. What do you think? We could both maintains this package. Could you please check http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libmowgli/libmowgli_0.5.0-1.dsc and see what's different with your package. Could you please send me you're source package now ? Regards, Adam. Regards, Patrick
Bug#444334: libmowgli packaging
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 01:31:24PM +0200, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: Please ask you sponsor to do not upload now. We'll merge both work. Okay. I sent him a notice. We could both maintains this package. Good. Could you please check http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libmowgli/libmowgli_0.5.0-1.dsc and see what's different with your package. I'm on my way with this. Please note that I also merged our both wnpp bugs. Could you please send me you're source package now ? I will send it to you, as soon as i merged our changes. Okay? Regards, Patrick
Bug#444334: libmowgli packaging
Patrick Schoenfeld a écrit : On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 01:31:24PM +0200, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: Please ask you sponsor to do not upload now. We'll merge both work. Okay. I sent him a notice. We could both maintains this package. Good. :-) Could you please check http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libmowgli/libmowgli_0.5.0-1.dsc and see what's different with your package. I'm on my way with this. Please note that I also merged our both wnpp bugs. Thanks. Could you please send me you're source package now ? I will send it to you, as soon as i merged our changes. Okay? Okay, I stay tuned :) I have small patches to fix library soname and enable verbose build. At least theses ones are really required if you don't have them already. I have a small set of seds to used to make examples build standalone. Should be usefull too. Feel free to ask me if there's something that need explanation. Please check my debian/copyright too, it's quite clean (I guess). Regards, Patrick
Bug#444334: libmowgli packaging
Hi, On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 01:59:57PM +0200, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: I have small patches to fix library soname and enable verbose build. At As I said, I integrated these patches, but I think its important that upstream fixes SONAME, because having different SOAMES specifically for Debian is generally a bad idea IMHO. Do you want to communicate that with him? Regards, Patrick
Bug#444334: libmowgli packaging
Patrick Schoenfeld a écrit : Hi, On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 01:59:57PM +0200, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: I have small patches to fix library soname and enable verbose build. At As I said, I integrated these patches, but I think its important that upstream fixes SONAME, because having different SOAMES specifically for Debian is generally a bad idea IMHO. Do you want to communicate that with him? It's already fixed upstream. I still do not see the aim of the shlibs file which would had some to strict dependency. Until soname gets bumped, it'll stll be ABI compatible, so having a verisonned dependency is useless. About the autotools stuff, it has becomed the default behavior in dh-make. They still get updated but do not appear anymore in diff.gz. Regards, Patrick
Bug#444334: libmowgli packaging
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 05:47:53PM +0200, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: It's already fixed upstream. I still do not see the aim of the shlibs Good. About the autotools stuff, it has becomed the default behavior in dh-make. They still get updated but do not appear anymore in diff.gz. That appears to make sense, even though I wonder why autotools-dev docs aren't updated accordingly. Regards, Patrick
Bug#444334: libmowgli packaging
Patrick Schoenfeld a écrit : On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 05:47:53PM +0200, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: It's already fixed upstream. I still do not see the aim of the shlibs Good. About the autotools stuff, it has becomed the default behavior in dh-make. They still get updated but do not appear anymore in diff.gz. That appears to make sense, even though I wonder why autotools-dev docs aren't updated accordingly. Many debian documentation is out-dated :/ Could you please give me a rw access to the svn repo ? I'm Le_Vert at debian IRC. Regards, Patrick
Bug#444334: libmowgli packaging
Hi, I already have a working package and plan to upload it soon. Could you please let me care of this package, as the work is already done and because I'm used to work with the atheme guys (audacious maintainer). Thanks in advance, Regards, Adam. PS: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libmowgli/libmowgli_0.5.0-1.dsc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
