Bug#446617: (fwd) Bug#446617: texlive-metapost: Omits font encoding from output

2007-11-05 Thread Taco Hoekwater



Braun Gábor wrote:

(Please leave [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Cc)

We got a bug report on Debian which still uses mpost as present in TeX
Live 2007 (ie) 0.993. See below for the bug description and a test file.

Is this fixed by MetaPost 1.00, or is this something new?

Works for me (MetaPost 1.000).


This bug will be fixed in MetPost 1.001 (to be released this week)

Best wishes,
Taco




Bug#446617: (fwd) Bug#446617: texlive-metapost: Omits font encoding from output

2007-10-29 Thread Braun Gábor
  (Please leave [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Cc)
 
  We got a bug report on Debian which still uses mpost as present in TeX
  Live 2007 (ie) 0.993. See below for the bug description and a test file.
 
  Is this fixed by MetaPost 1.00, or is this something new?

 Works for me (MetaPost 1.000).

 Gábor, can you test the metapost 1.000 source distribution from
http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/metapost/
 to make sure?

Hi Taco and others,

Unfortunately, it does not work for me. :((

The only difference between the output of the different versions of MetaPost
is in the comments Creator and CreationDate, e.g.

$ diff test1.1 test3.1
4,5c4,5
 %%Creator: MetaPost 0.993
 %%CreationDate: 2007.10.29:1705
---
 %%Creator: MetaPost 1.000
 %%CreationDate: 2007.10.29:1657

I have used only the binaries from MetaPost 1.000
and the format file mpost.mem generated for it, all other files were from the 
old MetaPost.  At least there is no difference between the two versions of 
mpost.mp and TEX.mp.

Best wishes,

Gábor Braun




Bug#446617: (fwd) Bug#446617: texlive-metapost: Omits font encoding from output

2007-10-23 Thread Norbert Preining
forwarded 446617 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks

Dear Taco! Dear all!

(Please leave [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Cc)

We got a bug report on Debian which still uses mpost as present in TeX
Live 2007 (ie) 0.993. See below for the bug description and a test file.

Is this fixed by MetaPost 1.00, or is this something new?

Thanks a lot and all the best

Norbert

- Forwarded message from Gábor Braun [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

 From: Gábor Braun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Bug#446617: texlive-metapost: Omits font encoding from output
 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.31
 Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:09:17 +0200
 
 Package: texlive-metapost
 Version: 2007-14
 Severity: normal
 
 
 Hi,
 
 When I run metapost  with the command
 
 mpost test2.mp
 
 where test2.mp is the minimal input file.
 It produces two output files: test2.1 and test2.2.
 
 I can view the first one in gv but not the second one.
 The second one reports the error:
 
 Error: /undefined in enclmmathsy
 Operand stack:
Encoding
 Execution stack:
%interp_exit   .runexec2   --nostringval--   --nostringval--   
 --nostringval--   2   %stopped_push   --nostringval--   --nostringval--   
 --nostringval--   false   1   %stopped_push   1   3   %oparray_pop   1   3   
 %oparray_pop   --nostringval--   1   3   %oparray_pop   1   3   %oparray_pop  
  
 ..runexec2   --nostringval--   --nostringval--   --nostringval--   2   
 %stopped_push   --nostringval--
 Dictionary stack:
--dict:1124/1686(ro)(G)--   --dict:0/20(G)--   --dict:83/200(L)--   
 --dict:15/16(L)--
 Current allocation mode is local
 Current file position is 3098
 GPL Ghostscript 8.54: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
 
 The sole difference between the two output files is that the encoding vector 
 enclmmathsy is missing from the second one, i.e. the lines
 
 %%BeginResource: encoding enclmmathsy
 
 %%EndResource
 
 (here ... denotes omitted lines).
 
 This contradicts the documentation mpman.pdf pages 23-24,
 which says that when prologues:=2 then the font encoding vectors should be 
 embedded.
 
   Braun Gábor
 
 ##
 minimal input file named test2.mp
 
 prologues := 2;
 
 input TEX;
 
 TEXPRE(%latex  char(10)  \documentclass{article}  char(10)
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}  char(10)
\usepackage{lmodern}\begin{document});
 TEXPOST(\end{document});
 
 beginfig(1);
   label(TEX($-1$),origin);
 endfig;
 
 beginfig(2);
   label(TEX($-1$),origin);
 endfig;
 
 end;
 
 ##
- End forwarded message -

---
Dr. Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED]Vienna University of Technology
Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094  fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
---
HENSTRIDGE (n.)
The dried yellow substance found between the prongs of forks in
restaurants.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#446617: (fwd) Bug#446617: texlive-metapost: Omits font encoding from output

2007-10-23 Thread Taco Hoekwater



Norbert Preining wrote:

forwarded 446617 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks

Dear Taco! Dear all!

(Please leave [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Cc)

We got a bug report on Debian which still uses mpost as present in TeX
Live 2007 (ie) 0.993. See below for the bug description and a test file.

Is this fixed by MetaPost 1.00, or is this something new?


Works for me (MetaPost 1.000).

Gábor, can you test the metapost 1.000 source distribution from
  http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/metapost/
to make sure?

Best wishes,
Taco