Bug#448118: overlapdial does not work with package libpri1.0, blockdial works fine. With an older version of libpri, such as 1.2, overlapdial still works.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 05:04:33PM +0200, Frank Segtrop wrote: Faidon Liambotis schrieb: Frank Segtrop wrote: This works fine with blockdial, and it works with an older version of libpri. Which one? 1.2.4 Yes, I was bitten by this bug, too, when I upgraded to Asterisk version 1.4.13-BRIstuffed-0.4.0-test4. My Zap channel which is needing overlapdial stopped working. According to http://www.ip-phone-forum.de/showthread.php?p=940540 (German) this is a bug in Bristuff: „Ja. Genau. Mit der libpri-1.4.1 aus bristuff-0.40.test4 kann ich an der als NT konfigurierten hfc-Karte nicht wählen. Nach dem Löschen der libs und Kompilieren der libpri-1.2.4 aus bristuff-0.30 geht es.” Summary: libpri-1.4.1 and bristuff-0.40.test4 don’t work with a HFC ISDN card configured in NT mode. Using the libs from the package libpri1.2_1.2.4-1 (bypassing the dependency chain) 1.4.13 is working fine like the 1.2version before. Shade and sweet water! Stephan -- | Stephan SeitzE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | PGP Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/pgp.html | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#448118: overlapdial does not work with package libpri1.0, blockdial works fine. With an older version of libpri, such as 1.2, overlapdial still works.
tags 448118 + upstream pending thanks Stephan Seitz wrote: Yes, I was bitten by this bug, too, when I upgraded to Asterisk version 1.4.13-BRIstuffed-0.4.0-test4. My Zap channel which is needing overlapdial stopped working. According to http://www.ip-phone-forum.de/showthread.php?p=940540 (German) this is a bug in Bristuff: „Ja. Genau. Mit der libpri-1.4.1 aus bristuff-0.40.test4 kann ich an der als NT konfigurierten hfc-Karte nicht wählen. Nach dem Löschen der libs und Kompilieren der libpri-1.2.4 aus bristuff-0.30 geht es.” Summary: libpri-1.4.1 and bristuff-0.40.test4 don’t work with a HFC ISDN card configured in NT mode. Using the libs from the package libpri1.2_1.2.4-1 (bypassing the dependency chain) 1.4.13 is working fine like the 1.2version before. Fortunately, Tzafrir fixed the bug :-) It's pending upload. Real soon now (tm). Thanks, Faidon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#448118: overlapdial does not work with package libpri1.0, blockdial works fine. With an older version of libpri, such as 1.2, overlapdial still works.
Package: libpri1.0 Version: 1.4.1-2 Severity: normal -- Accepting overlap voice call from '195' to '0' on channel 0/2, span 1 -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/2-1' -- Hungup 'Zap/2-1' Asterisk never receives the additional digits. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22.6 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages libpri1.0 depends on: ii libc6 2.6.1-1+b1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries libpri1.0 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#448118: overlapdial does not work with package libpri1.0, blockdial works fine. With an older version of libpri, such as 1.2, overlapdial still works.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 09:31:31AM +0200, Frank Segtrop wrote: Package: libpri1.0 Version: 1.4.1-2 Severity: normal -- Accepting overlap voice call from '195' to '0' on channel 0/2, span 1 -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/2-1' -- Hungup 'Zap/2-1' What version of Asterisk do you use? Do you have overlapdial enabled in zapata.conf? Much of the relevant logic is in Asterisk's chan_zap. Could you also please post a more complete log? in logger.conf enable the full line and run in the CLI: logger reload core set verbose 5 core set debug 5 pri debug span 1 And then please post the part of /var/log/asterisk/full relating ot the call . -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#448118: overlapdial does not work with package libpri1.0, blockdial works fine. With an older version of libpri, such as 1.2, overlapdial still works.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 03:30:03PM +0200, Frank Segtrop wrote: Is that the first '0' in the number or the one just before the last '2'? The number dialed so far was: 0179250802 Could you please provide the diaplplan context matflow-phones and every context it inlcudes? -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#448118: overlapdial does not work with package libpri1.0, blockdial works fine. With an older version of libpri, such as 1.2, overlapdial still works.
Tzafrir Cohen schrieb: On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 09:31:31AM +0200, Frank Segtrop wrote: Package: libpri1.0 Version: 1.4.1-2 Severity: normal -- Accepting overlap voice call from '195' to '0' on channel 0/2, span 1 -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/2-1' -- Hungup 'Zap/2-1' What version of Asterisk do you use? Asterisk 1.4.13-BRIstuffed-0.4.0-test4 built by pbuilder @ grnetbox on a x86_64 running Linux on 2007-10-10 19:23:45 UTC Do you have overlapdial enabled in zapata.conf? Yes, sure. Much of the relevant logic is in Asterisk's chan_zap. Could you also please post a more complete log? in logger.conf enable the full line and run in the CLI: logger reload core set verbose 5 core set debug 5 pri debug span 1 And then please post the part of /var/log/asterisk/full relating ot the call . [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 -- Restarting T203 counter [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=27 [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 Call Ref: len= 1 (reference 1/0x1) (Originator) [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 Message type: SETUP (5) [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 [04 03 80 90 a3] [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 Bearer Capability (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 Q.931 Std: 0 Info transfer capability: Speech (0) [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 Ext: 1 Trans mode/rate: 64kbps, circuit-mode (16) [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 Ext: 1 User information layer 1: A-Law (35) [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 [18 01 83] [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 Channel ID (len= 3) [ Ext: 1 IntID: Implicit Other Spare: 0 Preferred Dchan: 0 [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 ChanSel: Any channel selectedNo channel selected [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 ] [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 [6c 05 01 80 31 39 35] [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 Calling Number (len= 7) [ Ext: 0 TON: Unknown Number Type (0) NPI: ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 Presentation: Presentation permitted, user number not screened (0) '195' ] [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 [70 02 81 30] [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 Called Number (len= 4) [ Ext: 1 TON: Unknown Number Type (0) NPI: ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) '0' ] [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 [7d 02 91 81] [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 High-layer compatibilty (len= 4) [ [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 0x91 [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 0x81 [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 ] [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 -- Making new call for cr 1 [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 -- Processing Q.931 Call Setup [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 -- Processing IE 4 (cs0, Bearer Capability) [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 -- Processing IE 24 (cs0, Channel Identification) [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 -- Processing IE 108 (cs0, Calling Party Number) [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 -- Processing IE 112 (cs0, Called Party Number) [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 -- Processing IE 125 (cs0, High-layer Compatibility) [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 q931.c:4224 q931_receive: call 1 on channel -1 enters state 6 (Call Present) [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 -- Restarting T203 counter [Oct 26 15:20:54] DEBUG[21244] chan_zap.c: Found empty available channel 0/2 [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 q931.c:3301 q931_setup_ack: call 1 on channel 2 enters state 25 (Overlap Receiving) [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 -- Restarting T203 counter [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=11 [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 Call Ref: len= 1 (reference 129/0x81) (Terminator) [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 Message type: SETUP ACKNOWLEDGE (13) [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 [18 01 8a] [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 Channel ID (len= 3) [ Ext: 1 IntID: Implicit Other Spare: 0 Exclusive Dchan: 0 [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 ChanSel: B2 channel [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 ] [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 [1e 02 81 88] [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 Progress Indicator (len= 4) [ Ext: 1 Coding: CCITT (ITU) standard (0) 0: 0 Location: Private network serving the local user (1) [Oct 26 15:20:54] VERBOSE[21244] logger.c: 1 Ext: 1 Progress Description: Inband
Bug#448118: overlapdial does not work with package libpri1.0, blockdial works fine. With an older version of libpri, such as 1.2, overlapdial still works.
It does not matter which number we dial, they all don't work. The number
in the log is not a real number for privacy reasons.
The log shows that asterisk never gets the whole number, it only gets
the first digit when we use overlapdialing.
The relevant plan of the dialplan:
exten = _0XXX.,1,Dial(Zap/g3/${EXTEN})
exten = _0XXX.,n,Hangup()
This works fine with blockdial, and it works with an older version of
libpri.
--Frank Segtrop
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#448118: overlapdial does not work with package libpri1.0, blockdial works fine. With an older version of libpri, such as 1.2, overlapdial still works.
Frank Segtrop wrote: This works fine with blockdial, and it works with an older version of libpri. Which one? Regards, Faidon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#448118: overlapdial does not work with package libpri1.0, blockdial works fine. With an older version of libpri, such as 1.2, overlapdial still works.
Faidon Liambotis schrieb: Frank Segtrop wrote: This works fine with blockdial, and it works with an older version of libpri. Which one? 1.2.4 Regards, Frank signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
