Bug#449356: elfsh: should this package be orphaned?
retitle 449356 elfsh: should this package be removed? severtity 449356 serious thanks On Wednesday 02 April 2008, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Hello Andrés, > > On Wednesday 12 December 2007, Andrés Roldán wrote: > > Please don't orphan this package as I am now packaging Eresi which will > > replace elfsh. > > I was wondering, why elfsh should not be orphaned (or even removed) before > eresi is packaged? ping ^^^ Will request the package's removal in a month if no progress is made. > > If you really don't want any action to be performed on elfsh, could you > then please provide some information about your erasi ITP? > > > Thanks. > > Kind regards, Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#434826: Bug#449356: elfsh: should this package be orphaned?
Hello Andrés, On Wednesday 12 December 2007, Andrés Roldán wrote: > Please don't orphan this package as I am now packaging Eresi which will > replace elfsh. I was wondering, why elfsh should not be orphaned (or even removed) before eresi is packaged? If you really don't want any action to be performed on elfsh, could you then please provide some information about your erasi ITP? > > Thanks. > Kind regards, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Bug#434826: Bug#449356: elfsh: should this package be orphaned?
On 12/12/07 at 15:26 -0500, Andrés Roldán wrote: > > Hi, > > > > While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that > > should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: > > > > * 4 RC bugs with no recent activity > Please don't orphan this package as I am now packaging Eresi which will > replace elfsh. Hi Andrés, Have you made some progress on this ITP? I'm a bit concerned about the fact that elfsh is completely broken, while the work on packaging eresi seems to have been ongoing for several months. Do you have an idea of when the eresi package will be available? Will it be in time for lenny? Thank you, -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#449356: elfsh: should this package be orphaned?
Please don't orphan this package as I am now packaging Eresi which will replace elfsh. Thanks. On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 12:22 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Package: elfsh > Version: 0.65rc1-1.1 > Severity: serious > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Usertags: proposed-orphan > > Hi, > > While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that > should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: > > * 4 RC bugs with no recent activity > > If you think that it should be removed from Debian instead of being > orphaned, please reply to this bug and tell so. > > If you agree that it should be orphaned, sending the following commands > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should do it (after replacing nn with > this bug's number): > > severity nn normal > reassign nn wnpp > retitle nn O: -- > thanks > > For more information, see > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-archive-manip > http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ > > If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please > close this bug, preferably in an upload also fixing the other issues. > > Thank you, > -- Andrés Roldán Ingeniero de Proyectos - Debian Developer - C|EH Fluidsignal Group S.A. Where security meets business http://www.fuidsignal.com/ ISO 9001:2000 ISO/IEC 27001:2005 Teléfono: +57 (4) 3522627 ext. 205 Móvil: +57 313-6463678 PGP Key-ID: 0xB29396EB signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#449356: elfsh: should this package be orphaned?
Package: elfsh Version: 0.65rc1-1.1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * 4 RC bugs with no recent activity If you think that it should be removed from Debian instead of being orphaned, please reply to this bug and tell so. If you agree that it should be orphaned, sending the following commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should do it (after replacing nn with this bug's number): severity nn normal reassign nn wnpp retitle nn O: -- thanks For more information, see http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-archive-manip http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please close this bug, preferably in an upload also fixing the other issues. Thank you, -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
