Bug#468097: closed by Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#468097: should depend on a generic shorewall-compiler)

2008-03-02 Thread oggei
Il giorno gio, 28/02/2008 alle 15.48 -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez ha
scritto:

> In that case, then you can install shorewall-perl directly.  Or, if you
> are upgrading from Etch, then you can upgrad shorewall, which install
> shorewall-shell.  Then you can install shorewall-perl simultaneously.
> Once you have your config working satisfactorily in shorewall-perl, then
> you remove shorewall and shorewall-perl packages.


Thank you, i've totally missed the thing, and btw thanks for
maintaining such a package.


cheers,
-- 
ale




Bug#468097: closed by Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#468097: should depend on a generic shorewall-compiler)

2008-02-28 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 01:13:35PM +0100, oggei wrote:
> 
> well, that was just for allow uninstall of -shell if one uses -perl.
> 
> Anyway, i'm not sure i'm understanding your point, so we'll see with
> lenny release.
> 
In that case, then you can install shorewall-perl directly.  Or, if you
are upgrading from Etch, then you can upgrad shorewall, which install
shorewall-shell.  Then you can install shorewall-perl simultaneously.
Once you have your config working satisfactorily in shorewall-perl, then
you remove shorewall and shorewall-perl packages.

Regards,

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#468097: closed by Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#468097: should depend on a generic shorewall-compiler)

2008-02-28 Thread oggei
Il giorno mer, 27/02/2008 alle 00.39 +, Debian Bug Tracking System
ha scritto:

> > > Package should depends on a generic shorewall-compiler
> > > metapackage, provided by either shorewall-shell or shorewall-perl.
> > > 
> > It depends on shorewall-shell because it is designed to be a
> > transitional package.  After the release of Lenny, I will remove the
> > shorewall package altogether.  Anyway, it is not right, in my
> > opinion,
> > to make shorewall depend on shorewall-shell | shorewall-perl (or on
> > a
> > metapackage that provides both or either) since shorewall-perl is
> > not a
> > natural upgrade path for current users of shorewall in Etch.
> > 
> > So, this is not a bug and I am closing it.

well, that was just for allow uninstall of -shell if one uses -perl.

Anyway, i'm not sure i'm understanding your point, so we'll see with
lenny release.

thank you,

ale



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]