Bug#472501: doc-base: Please add the Programming/OCaml section
Stefano Zacchiroli writes: Hi, On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 06:33:08PM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote: It would be nice if you could allow the Programming/OCaml section. There are many OCaml libraries in Debian and having all their doc registered in the same section would be useful. Seconded. Programming/OCaml is a valid section. Quoting the section 2.3.3 of doc-base manual: Programming IDEs, debuggers, compilers, APIs, libraries, programming languages. Documentation related to only one specific language should be put in subsection named like the language, for example: * C * C++ * Java * Perl * Python * Ruby The list contains only examples and is not (and most probably never be) complete. I can add OCaml to it in the next release. While we are at it, can the doc-base maintainer please comment on whether the sections Programming/Foo are appropriate for library documentation automatically generated by some literate programming tool (ocamldoc in our case, but more generally also javadoc, pydoc, ...). Obviously! APIs of language Foo, even automatically generated, should go to Programming/Foo. Regards, robert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#472501: doc-base: Please add the Programming/OCaml section
Package: doc-base Version: 0.8.10 Severity: wishlist Hi, It would be nice if you could allow the Programming/OCaml section. There are many OCaml libraries in Debian and having all their doc registered in the same section would be useful. Thanks! -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages doc-base depends on: ii perl 5.8.8-12 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii scrollkeeper 0.3.14-16 A free electronic cataloging syste doc-base recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#472501: doc-base: Please add the Programming/OCaml section
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 06:33:08PM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote: It would be nice if you could allow the Programming/OCaml section. There are many OCaml libraries in Debian and having all their doc registered in the same section would be useful. Seconded. While we are at it, can the doc-base maintainer please comment on whether the sections Programming/Foo are appropriate for library documentation automatically generated by some literate programming tool (ocamldoc in our case, but more generally also javadoc, pydoc, ...). If it is not please point us to the appropriate sub-section. Many thanks in advance, Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ... now what? [EMAIL PROTECTED],cs.unibo.it,debian.org} -%- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ?/\All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema\/right keys at the right time signature.asc Description: Digital signature
