Bug#478693: Incompatibility of libc6 with kernel 2.6 ax25
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 11:42:57PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 10:33:59PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
tag 478693 + moreinfo
thanks
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 01:57:26PM +0200, Arjan van Schijndel wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.6.ds1-13etch5
The following files in libc6 are not up to date: netax25/ax25.h
netrom/netrom.h netrose/rose.h. Meaning these files do not correspond
with the ax25.h netrom.h and rose.h from the 2.6 kernel. Resulting in
a wrong syscall.h.
Could you please give more details?
A quick look showed that netrose/rose.h and linux/rose.h are the same.
linux/ax25.h and linux/rose.h have a few more definitions netax25/ax25.h
and netrom/netrom.h, but the #define and structures present in the glibc
one are the same than the ones in the kernel.
The best would be to tell us which structures / #define are missing to
get you application compiled.
A closer look showed that the only outdated part is in netax25/ax25.h.
netrom/netrom.h and netrose/rose.h are up-to-date.
Here are a patch to update netax25/ax25.h. Could you please try it and
see if it fixes your problems?
diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/netax25/ax25.h
b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/netax25/ax25.h
index ce3c7ab..3ca2b4d 100644
--- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/netax25/ax25.h
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/netax25/ax25.h
@@ -50,9 +50,11 @@
#define SIOCAX25SETPARMS(SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+6)
#define SIOCAX25OPTRT (SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+7)
#define SIOCAX25CTLCON (SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+8)
-#define SIOCAX25GETINFO (SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+9)
+#define SIOCAX25GETINFOOLD (SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+9)
#define SIOCAX25ADDFWD (SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+10)
#define SIOCAX25DELFWD (SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+11)
+#define SIOCAX25DEVCTL (SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+12)
+#define SIOCAX25GETINFO (SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+13)
/* unknown: */
#define AX25_NOUID_DEFAULT 0
@@ -112,13 +114,16 @@ struct ax25_ctl_struct
struct ax25_info_struct
{
-unsigned int n2, n2count;
+unsigned int n2, n2count;
unsigned int t1, t1timer;
unsigned int t2, t2timer;
unsigned int t3, t3timer;
unsigned int idle, idletimer;
unsigned int state;
unsigned int rcv_q, snd_q;
+unsigned int vs, vr, va, vs_max;
+unsigned int paclen;
+unsigned int window;
};
struct ax25_fwd_struct
Any news on that?
Any news on that?
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#478693: Incompatibility of libc6 with kernel 2.6 ax25
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 11:42:57PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 10:33:59PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
tag 478693 + moreinfo
thanks
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 01:57:26PM +0200, Arjan van Schijndel wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.6.ds1-13etch5
The following files in libc6 are not up to date: netax25/ax25.h
netrom/netrom.h netrose/rose.h. Meaning these files do not correspond
with the ax25.h netrom.h and rose.h from the 2.6 kernel. Resulting in
a wrong syscall.h.
Could you please give more details?
A quick look showed that netrose/rose.h and linux/rose.h are the same.
linux/ax25.h and linux/rose.h have a few more definitions netax25/ax25.h
and netrom/netrom.h, but the #define and structures present in the glibc
one are the same than the ones in the kernel.
The best would be to tell us which structures / #define are missing to
get you application compiled.
A closer look showed that the only outdated part is in netax25/ax25.h.
netrom/netrom.h and netrose/rose.h are up-to-date.
Here are a patch to update netax25/ax25.h. Could you please try it and
see if it fixes your problems?
diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/netax25/ax25.h
b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/netax25/ax25.h
index ce3c7ab..3ca2b4d 100644
--- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/netax25/ax25.h
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/netax25/ax25.h
@@ -50,9 +50,11 @@
#define SIOCAX25SETPARMS (SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+6)
#define SIOCAX25OPTRT(SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+7)
#define SIOCAX25CTLCON (SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+8)
-#define SIOCAX25GETINFO (SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+9)
+#define SIOCAX25GETINFOOLD (SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+9)
#define SIOCAX25ADDFWD (SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+10)
#define SIOCAX25DELFWD (SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+11)
+#define SIOCAX25DEVCTL (SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+12)
+#define SIOCAX25GETINFO (SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+13)
/* unknown: */
#define AX25_NOUID_DEFAULT 0
@@ -112,13 +114,16 @@ struct ax25_ctl_struct
struct ax25_info_struct
{
-unsigned int n2, n2count;
+unsigned int n2, n2count;
unsigned int t1, t1timer;
unsigned int t2, t2timer;
unsigned int t3, t3timer;
unsigned int idle, idletimer;
unsigned int state;
unsigned int rcv_q, snd_q;
+unsigned int vs, vr, va, vs_max;
+unsigned int paclen;
+unsigned int window;
};
struct ax25_fwd_struct
Any news on that?
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#478693: Incompatibility of libc6 with kernel 2.6 ax25
tag 478693 + moreinfo thanks On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 01:57:26PM +0200, Arjan van Schijndel wrote: Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.6.ds1-13etch5 The following files in libc6 are not up to date: netax25/ax25.h netrom/netrom.h netrose/rose.h. Meaning these files do not correspond with the ax25.h netrom.h and rose.h from the 2.6 kernel. Resulting in a wrong syscall.h. Could you please give more details? A quick look showed that netrose/rose.h and linux/rose.h are the same. linux/ax25.h and linux/rose.h have a few more definitions netax25/ax25.h and netrom/netrom.h, but the #define and structures present in the glibc one are the same than the ones in the kernel. The best would be to tell us which structures / #define are missing to get you application compiled. Also, as already suggested, it would probably be best to use include files from the kernel instead of the glibc ones. The kernel has now a correct way to export an API to userland. The glibc is not really the the best place to describe a kernel - userland API and it may be better to remove those files instead of updating them. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#478693: Incompatibility of libc6 with kernel 2.6 ax25
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 10:33:59PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
tag 478693 + moreinfo
thanks
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 01:57:26PM +0200, Arjan van Schijndel wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.6.ds1-13etch5
The following files in libc6 are not up to date: netax25/ax25.h
netrom/netrom.h netrose/rose.h. Meaning these files do not correspond
with the ax25.h netrom.h and rose.h from the 2.6 kernel. Resulting in
a wrong syscall.h.
Could you please give more details?
A quick look showed that netrose/rose.h and linux/rose.h are the same.
linux/ax25.h and linux/rose.h have a few more definitions netax25/ax25.h
and netrom/netrom.h, but the #define and structures present in the glibc
one are the same than the ones in the kernel.
The best would be to tell us which structures / #define are missing to
get you application compiled.
A closer look showed that the only outdated part is in netax25/ax25.h.
netrom/netrom.h and netrose/rose.h are up-to-date.
Here are a patch to update netax25/ax25.h. Could you please try it and
see if it fixes your problems?
diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/netax25/ax25.h
b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/netax25/ax25.h
index ce3c7ab..3ca2b4d 100644
--- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/netax25/ax25.h
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/netax25/ax25.h
@@ -50,9 +50,11 @@
#define SIOCAX25SETPARMS (SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+6)
#define SIOCAX25OPTRT (SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+7)
#define SIOCAX25CTLCON (SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+8)
-#define SIOCAX25GETINFO(SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+9)
+#define SIOCAX25GETINFOOLD (SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+9)
#define SIOCAX25ADDFWD (SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+10)
#define SIOCAX25DELFWD (SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+11)
+#define SIOCAX25DEVCTL (SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+12)
+#define SIOCAX25GETINFO(SIOCPROTOPRIVATE+13)
/* unknown: */
#define AX25_NOUID_DEFAULT 0
@@ -112,13 +114,16 @@ struct ax25_ctl_struct
struct ax25_info_struct
{
-unsigned int n2, n2count;
+unsigned int n2, n2count;
unsigned int t1, t1timer;
unsigned int t2, t2timer;
unsigned int t3, t3timer;
unsigned int idle, idletimer;
unsigned int state;
unsigned int rcv_q, snd_q;
+unsigned int vs, vr, va, vs_max;
+unsigned int paclen;
+unsigned int window;
};
struct ax25_fwd_struct
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#478693: Incompatibility of libc6 with kernel 2.6 ax25
First of all I don't want to run unstable or experimental. If I am not mistaken, I wrote in the original bug report that the problem houses in the upload. Hence, the source file provided by the gnu developing crew. Even their upload version glibc-2.7 has this incompatibility problem. As far as I know, kernel 2.6 is more robust in the hamradio stuff then it previous versions 2.0 2.2 2.4. But Someone forgot to tell this to the glibc maintainers, because their files are only compatible with the kernel 2.4. That means not compatible with kernel 2.0 2.2 and 2.6. So technically glibc is not compatible with kernel 2.6. Fortunately, it is only for the hamradio stuff, where it has some difficulties. Kernel 2.6 != glibc glibc = libax25 libax25 = ax25-apps, ax25-tools, node and z8530-utils2 I think it is reasonable easy to fix, but I have no experience in the upload from the kernel into the glibc. In the past Alan Cox did this, if I am not wrong. If the glibc is up to date, it is reasonable easy to update the hamradio packages. To answer your second question. No, it is not enough to use these files, because these files are wrong. The function described in these files are not compatible with the 2.6 kernel. Hence, the lib files and syscall part of these files are incompatible. A possible scenario, I use a function from libax25 which is only compatible with kernel 2.4, as stated above. This function calls the handles of the glibc, which on its turn calls the handles of the 2.4 kernel. Oops, etch is running a 2.6 kernel, the kernel has to options either it is not so terrible and ignores it, or jumps into panic. For the mkiss command called by ax25ipd, the kernel gets a panic attack. Arjan On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 01:57:26PM +0200, Arjan van Schijndel wrote: Version: 2.3.6.ds1-13etch5 And in unstable? The following files in libc6 are not up to date: netax25/ax25.h netrom/netrom.h netrose/rose.h. Meaning these files do not correspond with the ax25.h netrom.h and rose.h from the 2.6 kernel. Resulting in a wrong syscall.h. Would it be enough to use the linux-libc-dev provided files linux/netrom.h, linux/rose.h and linux/ax25.h? Bastian -- It is undignified for a woman to play servant to a man who is not hers. -- Spock, Amok Time, stardate 3372.7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#478693: Incompatibility of libc6 with kernel 2.6 ax25
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.6.ds1-13etch5 The following files in libc6 are not up to date: netax25/ax25.h netrom/netrom.h netrose/rose.h. Meaning these files do not correspond with the ax25.h netrom.h and rose.h from the 2.6 kernel. Resulting in a wrong syscall.h. This error result in upward dependency problems: libax25, ax25-apps, ax25-tools, node, z8530-utils. The origin of this problem is in the upload, even the gnu 2.7 source code has this error. An important notice is that these problems do not occur if you use the 2.4 kernel. Possible solutions: 1. Discus this problem with the kernel and libc6 developers. 2. Remove ax25 use from libc6 and make a special package depending on the right kernel and start from there to make the other ax25 packages. Hopefully this is enough information, Arjan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
