Bug#480534: 480534 is unfortunately not fixed
Alexander Sack wrote: On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 06:21:32PM +0200, Eric Valette wrote: Eric Valette wrote: Alexander Sack wrote: reopen 480534 thanks I noticed an linux-gnu_x86_64-gcc3 as platform but have nothing like gcc-3* installed. Removing the target architecture line from the iceowl-extension install.rdf indeed fixes the problem. I suspect, the line may be worth but then either the tools that generates it is wrong or the way icedove later checks its validity is wrong. Please try to build the iceowl source package and see if the result is better when built on your own system. Thanks, - Alexander Planned to do this anyway because I need to incorporate the fixes present for: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357180 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428392 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361635 Will try to see what I need to compile this. If you have any hint... -- eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#480534: 480534 is unfortunately not fixed
Hi alexander. Thanks for your quick tentative fix. Unfortunately, It still does not work on my amd64 system. I do not know how to reopen the bug and do not want to create a new one. 480534-reopen? If I can send you any file you would like to have. As I created a temporary account to test in a sane environment, it is not likeky to be in my profile files. -- eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#480534: 480534 is unfortunately not fixed
reopen 480534 thanks Ok, thanks for the info. On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:41:44AM +0200, Eric Valette wrote: Hi alexander. Thanks for your quick tentative fix. Unfortunately, It still does not work on my amd64 system. I do not know how to reopen the bug and do not want to create a new one. 480534-reopen? If I can send you any file you would like to have. As I created a temporary account to test in a sane environment, it is not likeky to be in my profile files. Attaching the profile tarred up would be a great thing to help me. Thanks, - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#480534: 480534 is unfortunately not fixed
Eric Valette wrote: Alexander Sack wrote: reopen 480534 thanks I noticed an linux-gnu_x86_64-gcc3 as platform but have nothing like gcc-3* installed. Removing the target architecture line from the iceowl-extension install.rdf indeed fixes the problem. I suspect, the line may be worth but then either the tools that generates it is wrong or the way icedove later checks its validity is wrong. -- eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#480534: 480534 is unfortunately not fixed
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 06:21:32PM +0200, Eric Valette wrote: Eric Valette wrote: Alexander Sack wrote: reopen 480534 thanks I noticed an linux-gnu_x86_64-gcc3 as platform but have nothing like gcc-3* installed. Removing the target architecture line from the iceowl-extension install.rdf indeed fixes the problem. I suspect, the line may be worth but then either the tools that generates it is wrong or the way icedove later checks its validity is wrong. Actually thats why i thought 0.8-2 fixes this. It should fix that platform issue. Anyway, will try harder to reproduce. - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#480534: 480534 is unfortunately not fixed
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 06:21:32PM +0200, Eric Valette wrote: Eric Valette wrote: Alexander Sack wrote: reopen 480534 thanks I noticed an linux-gnu_x86_64-gcc3 as platform but have nothing like gcc-3* installed. Removing the target architecture line from the iceowl-extension install.rdf indeed fixes the problem. I suspect, the line may be worth but then either the tools that generates it is wrong or the way icedove later checks its validity is wrong. Please try to build the iceowl source package and see if the result is better when built on your own system. Thanks, - Alexander signature.asc Description: Digital signature