Bug#480534: 480534 is unfortunately not fixed

2008-05-13 Thread Eric Valette
Alexander Sack wrote:
 On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 06:21:32PM +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
   
 Eric Valette wrote:
 
 Alexander Sack wrote:
   
 reopen 480534
 thanks
 
 I noticed an linux-gnu_x86_64-gcc3 as platform but have nothing like
 gcc-3* installed.
   
 Removing the target architecture line from the iceowl-extension
 install.rdf indeed fixes the problem. I suspect, the line may be worth
 but then either the tools that generates it is wrong or the way icedove
 later checks its validity is wrong.

 

 Please try to build the iceowl source package and see if the result is
 better when built on your own system.

 Thanks,

  - Alexander

   
Planned to do this anyway because I need to incorporate the fixes 
present for:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357180

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428392

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361635

Will try to see what I need to compile this. If you have any hint...

-- eric




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#480534: 480534 is unfortunately not fixed

2008-05-12 Thread Eric Valette
Hi alexander. Thanks for your quick tentative fix. Unfortunately, It
still does not work on my amd64 system. I do not know how to reopen the
bug and do not want to create a new one. 480534-reopen?

If I can send you any file you would like to have. As I created a
temporary account to test in a sane environment, it is not likeky to be
in my profile files.

-- eric






-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#480534: 480534 is unfortunately not fixed

2008-05-12 Thread Alexander Sack

reopen 480534
thanks

Ok, thanks for the info.

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:41:44AM +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
 Hi alexander. Thanks for your quick tentative fix. Unfortunately, It
 still does not work on my amd64 system. I do not know how to reopen the
 bug and do not want to create a new one. 480534-reopen?
 
 If I can send you any file you would like to have. As I created a
 temporary account to test in a sane environment, it is not likeky to be
 in my profile files.

Attaching the profile tarred up would be a great thing to help me.

Thanks,

 - Alexander




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#480534: 480534 is unfortunately not fixed

2008-05-12 Thread Eric Valette
Eric Valette wrote:
 Alexander Sack wrote:
 reopen 480534
 thanks

 I noticed an linux-gnu_x86_64-gcc3 as platform but have nothing like
 gcc-3* installed.

Removing the target architecture line from the iceowl-extension
install.rdf indeed fixes the problem. I suspect, the line may be worth
but then either the tools that generates it is wrong or the way icedove
later checks its validity is wrong.

-- eric






-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#480534: 480534 is unfortunately not fixed

2008-05-12 Thread Alexander Sack
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 06:21:32PM +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
 Eric Valette wrote:
  Alexander Sack wrote:
  reopen 480534
  thanks
 
  I noticed an linux-gnu_x86_64-gcc3 as platform but have nothing like
  gcc-3* installed.
 
 Removing the target architecture line from the iceowl-extension
 install.rdf indeed fixes the problem. I suspect, the line may be worth
 but then either the tools that generates it is wrong or the way icedove
 later checks its validity is wrong.
 

Actually thats why i thought 0.8-2 fixes this. It should fix that
platform issue. Anyway, will try harder to reproduce.

 - Alexander




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#480534: 480534 is unfortunately not fixed

2008-05-12 Thread Alexander Sack
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 06:21:32PM +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
 Eric Valette wrote:
  Alexander Sack wrote:
  reopen 480534
  thanks
 
  I noticed an linux-gnu_x86_64-gcc3 as platform but have nothing like
  gcc-3* installed.
 
 Removing the target architecture line from the iceowl-extension
 install.rdf indeed fixes the problem. I suspect, the line may be worth
 but then either the tools that generates it is wrong or the way icedove
 later checks its validity is wrong.
 

Please try to build the iceowl source package and see if the result is
better when built on your own system.

Thanks,

 - Alexander



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature