Bug#483564: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#483564: Bug#483564: reassign?

[Alexandre Rossi]

 Then feel free to reassign :)

For CONFIG_PREEMPT related things, the advice[1] seems to be : deal
with upstream directly. Upstream knows[2] about this, so I won't
bother the Kernel team with this unless they use CONFIG_PREEMPT=y ,
which won't be in the near future.

[1] http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-bugs.html
[2] 
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d5cae364148088911bdf007a8aaefb



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#483564: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#483564: Bug#483564: reassign?

[Yves-Alexis Perez]

On ven, 2008-09-26 at 20:36 +0200, Alexandre Rossi wrote:
  As a side note, shouldn't this be reassigned to the linux-source-*
  (source packages as linux-image-* do not seem to be built with
  CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled)?
 
  Well, as CONFIG_PREMPT is not used, I don't think kernel team will do
  anything about this. But you can try. I think you'd better report the
  bug upstream, if it's not already done.
 
  If it is fixed in 2.6.27rc1, as said above, I do not need to.
 
  And I guess that the kernel team has more important things to do than
  fixing stuff that does not trigger in linux-image-* ...
 
  But I'm still very interested in the fix for this ;)
 
 For the record, the maybe fix[1] on top of 2.6.26.5 does not work for
 me. I think there is more stuff involved.

Then feel free to reassign :)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]