Bug#484454: [: Re: Bug#484454: openoffice.org-filter-binfilter: hangs at ~98+% CPU trying to open .sdw docs from StarOffice 5.2]
[re-sending to proper Bug#, as suggested by [EMAIL PROTECTED]; somehow it was addressed to #484453] - Forwarded message from - Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:29:29 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#484454: openoffice.org-filter-binfilter: hangs at ~98+% CPU trying to open .sdw docs from StarOffice 5.2 On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:29:07AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: again. BPO is not in the scope of this BTS and the BTS does not know hm. ok. Then I suggest the BTS automatically rejects, with proper msg to reporter, reports for version it doesn't know of and/or isn't interested in. Try it in sid/lenny please before reporting a bug.. that'd mean I'd shut up till I eventually upgrade a machine to Lenny, which would happen rather long after Lenny-stable. Sorry, BPO is the only source of prepackaged .deb for Etch tracked by packages.debian.org afaik. Above the stable 2.0.4 that is. Testing and gathering infos for a bug report takes some effort, if you're not going to consider bug.rep. against BPO, pls state so clearly - possibly in the README.Debian - so that we save everybody's time (though I still need to find a workaroud). But perhaps that should go (also) on front pages on both pkg search and BTS as a general statement? this is part of Bug#471348 saga, only that I'm filing against the - hoeply - proper sub-pkg. In which you didn't submit any info with which the author can debug it. And in this bug you didn't either. wrong, check your mailbox: ! Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 07:01:01 +0100 ! To: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! Subject: Re: Bug#471348: openoffice.org: Segmentation fault trying to open a .sdc ! Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in which I attached one of those problematic files. Assuming such msg didn't vanished midway, of course. Like for the .sdc case there, OOo2.4.0-4~bpo40+1 hangs while trying to open a .sdw made in SO5.2, taking away the CPU. answering to your other msg: SEGV was the best/worst case: best since OOo2 died before taking the system down, worst since - well - it segv. That was for OOo2.3.1, OOo2.4.0 worked on those files, though (Debian's) OOo2 takes much more CPU to do the job than OOo1.1.5 *and* official OOo's OOo2.4.0 (which works just fine, so far). I feel I'm seeing effects of the some bug, in SO import filters. And like in the other case, OOo1.1.5 does the job without a glitch. No one even remotely cares about OOo 1.1.5 anymore. guess so; though I'm not reporting a bug against OOo1x, the fact that OOo1 get it right may give some hint. This is becoming a serious issue, as the doc base (here) is largely .sd* and Where have you been the last years? doing something else than keeping on upgrade break working systems. Then you should give out documents to get the authors debug it. Not just filing bugs which rot because no one can test. (like #471348). see above. I do what+when I can - I don't own those docs. anyway that it just happens for some documents, not all. correct (likely); looks like an heisenbug. Likely Debian-specific though, as OOo2 from OOo (build OOH680_m12_native_packed-1_it.9286) seems to work just fine (so far), on Woody, Sarge, Etch. thanks -- paolo - End forwarded message - -- paolo GPG/PGP id:0x3A47DE45 - B5F9 AAA0 44BD 2B63 81E0 971F C6C0 0B87 3A47 DE45 - 9/11: the outrageous deception and ongoing coverup: http://911review.org - -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#484454: [: Re: Bug#484454: openoffice.org-filter-binfilter: hangs at ~98+% CPU trying to open .sdw docs from StarOffice 5.2]
Paolo wrote: Try it in sid/lenny please before reporting a bug.. that'd mean I'd shut up till I eventually upgrade a machine to Lenny, which Or quickly set up a chroot with lenny or sid. Testing and gathering infos for a bug report takes some effort, if you're not going to consider bug.rep. against BPO, pls state so clearly - possibly I am not saying that, I just say you should try on the real codelines (sid/testing), too. And that you should report bugs against them then. this is part of Bug#471348 saga, only that I'm filing against the - hoeply - proper sub-pkg. In which you didn't submit any info with which the author can debug it. And in this bug you didn't either. wrong, check your mailbox: ! Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 07:01:01 +0100 ! To: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! Subject: Re: Bug#471348: openoffice.org: Segmentation fault trying to open a .sdc ! Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in which I attached one of those problematic files. Assuming such msg didn't vanished midway, of course. Hrm, yes, sorry, It seems I oversaw it. That said, it works in 2.4.1-2 for me (see my other mail) answering to your other msg: SEGV was the best/worst case: best since OOo2 died before taking the system down, worst since - well - it segv. That was for OOo2.3.1, OOo2.4.0 worked on those files, though (Debian's) OOo2 takes much more CPU to do the job than OOo1.1.5 *and* official OOo's OOo2.4.0 (which works just fine, so far). I feel I'm seeing effects of the some bug, in SO import filters. Hmm. No one even remotely cares about OOo 1.1.5 anymore. guess so; though I'm not reporting a bug against OOo1x, the fact that OOo1 get it right may give some hint. It doesn't, no one even can follow anymore what changed since it. Where have you been the last years? doing something else than keeping on upgrade break working systems. I did not say you should upgrade your main system. Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#484454: openoffice.org-filter-binfilter: hangs at ~98+% CPU trying to open .sdw docs from StarOffice 5.2
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:34:34AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi again, Paolo wrote: this is part of Bug#471348 saga, only that I'm filing against the - hoeply - ... Err, what? #484453 talks about a segfault not a hang. Can you please there's a bit of confusione here: I was talking of #471348, not #484453 which has nothing to do : Package: openafs-client Version: 1.4.7.dfsg1-2 Severity: wishlist -- paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#484454: openoffice.org-filter-binfilter: hangs at ~98+% CPU trying to open .sdw docs from StarOffice 5.2
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:41:44PM +0200, wrote: there's a bit of confusione here: I was talking of #471348, not #484453 whoops, sorry, forget that - checking the sent folder _now_ I see that a msg for #484454 got also CC:'d to #484453, though I have no idea how it happend, as I didn't manually set the addresses. -- paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#484454: openoffice.org-filter-binfilter: hangs at ~98+% CPU trying to open .sdw docs from StarOffice 5.2
tag 484454 + moreinfo found 484454 1:2.4.0-4 thanks Hi, Paolo wrote: Package: openoffice.org-filter-binfilter Version: 1:2.4.0-4~bpo40+1 Severity: normal again. BPO is not in the scope of this BTS and the BTS does not know about this version for tracking versions which have the bug or not. Marking as found in 2.4.0-4 although not knowing whether it happens in lenny/sid, too... Try it in sid/lenny please before reporting a bug.. this is part of Bug#471348 saga, only that I'm filing against the - hoeply - proper sub-pkg. In which you didn't submit any info with which the author can debug it. And in this bug you didn't either. Like for the .sdc case there, OOo2.4.0-4~bpo40+1 hangs while trying to open a .sdw made in SO5.2, taking away the CPU. Had to kill -9 soffice.bin to get the system back. And like in the other case, OOo1.1.5 does the job without a glitch. No one even remotely cares about OOo 1.1.5 anymore. This is becoming a serious issue, as the doc base (here) is largely .sd* and Where have you been the last years? SO dosn't work in Sarge/Etch anymore, systems are being migrated to Etch which ships OOo2 and I'd rather get rid of the fallback stuff in /opt/ from upstream OOo. Then you should give out documents to get the authors debug it. Not just filing bugs which rot because no one can test. (like #471348). That said, I do not have *any* SO 5.2 documents here to try, and I'd bet anyway that it just happens for some documents, not all. Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#484454: openoffice.org-filter-binfilter: hangs at ~98+% CPU trying to open .sdw docs from StarOffice 5.2
Hi again, Paolo wrote: this is part of Bug#471348 saga, only that I'm filing against the - hoeply - proper sub-pkg. Like for the .sdc case there, OOo2.4.0-4~bpo40+1 hangs while trying to open a .sdw made in SO5.2, taking away the CPU. Had to kill -9 soffice.bin to get the system back. Err, what? #484453 talks about a segfault not a hang. Can you please compare for simileriness? Or did the SIGSEV vanish and it now just hangs? Then 484453 should be updated (and those bugs merged, or this bug should have not been filed at all but 484453 reassigned). Anyway, as already said in my first reply: This time of course also more info needed before any action can be taken. Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#484453: Bug#484454: openoffice.org-filter-binfilter: hangs at ~98+% CPU trying to open .sdw docs from StarOffice 5.2
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:29:07AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: again. BPO is not in the scope of this BTS and the BTS does not know hm. ok. Then I suggest the BTS automatically rejects, with proper msg to reporter, reports for version it doesn't know of and/or isn't interested in. Try it in sid/lenny please before reporting a bug.. that'd mean I'd shut up till I eventually upgrade a machine to Lenny, which would happen rather long after Lenny-stable. Sorry, BPO is the only source of prepackaged .deb for Etch tracked by packages.debian.org afaik. Above the stable 2.0.4 that is. Testing and gathering infos for a bug report takes some effort, if you're not going to consider bug.rep. against BPO, pls state so clearly - possibly in the README.Debian - so that we save everybody's time (though I still need to find a workaroud). But perhaps that should go (also) on front pages on both pkg search and BTS as a general statement? this is part of Bug#471348 saga, only that I'm filing against the - hoeply - proper sub-pkg. In which you didn't submit any info with which the author can debug it. And in this bug you didn't either. wrong, check your mailbox: ! Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 07:01:01 +0100 ! To: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! Subject: Re: Bug#471348: openoffice.org: Segmentation fault trying to open a .sdc ! Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in which I attached one of those problematic files. Assuming such msg didn't vanished midway, of course. Like for the .sdc case there, OOo2.4.0-4~bpo40+1 hangs while trying to open a .sdw made in SO5.2, taking away the CPU. answering to your other msg: SEGV was the best/worst case: best since OOo2 died before taking the system down, worst since - well - it segv. That was for OOo2.3.1, OOo2.4.0 worked on those files, though (Debian's) OOo2 takes much more CPU to do the job than OOo1.1.5 *and* official OOo's OOo2.4.0 (which works just fine, so far). I feel I'm seeing effects of the some bug, in SO import filters. And like in the other case, OOo1.1.5 does the job without a glitch. No one even remotely cares about OOo 1.1.5 anymore. guess so; though I'm not reporting a bug against OOo1x, the fact that OOo1 get it right may give some hint. This is becoming a serious issue, as the doc base (here) is largely .sd* and Where have you been the last years? doing something else than keeping on upgrade break working systems. Then you should give out documents to get the authors debug it. Not just filing bugs which rot because no one can test. (like #471348). see above. I do what+when I can - I don't own those docs. anyway that it just happens for some documents, not all. correct (likely); looks like an heisenbug. Likely Debian-specific though, as OOo2 from OOo (build OOH680_m12_native_packed-1_it.9286) seems to work just fine (so far), on Woody, Sarge, Etch. thanks -- paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#484454: openoffice.org-filter-binfilter: hangs at ~98+% CPU trying to open .sdw docs from StarOffice 5.2
Package: openoffice.org-filter-binfilter Version: 1:2.4.0-4~bpo40+1 Severity: normal hello, this is part of Bug#471348 saga, only that I'm filing against the - hoeply - proper sub-pkg. Like for the .sdc case there, OOo2.4.0-4~bpo40+1 hangs while trying to open a .sdw made in SO5.2, taking away the CPU. Had to kill -9 soffice.bin to get the system back. And like in the other case, OOo1.1.5 does the job without a glitch. This is becoming a serious issue, as the doc base (here) is largely .sd* and SO dosn't work in Sarge/Etch anymore, systems are being migrated to Etch which ships OOo2 and I'd rather get rid of the fallback stuff in /opt/ from upstream OOo. thanks -- paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
