Bug#485492: Bug#694611:
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 00:54:11 +0100, Nick Andrik wrote: 2013/1/22 Martin Meredith mar...@sourceguru.net: Why the confersion to cdbs? Ca I gets a debdiff? I switched to cdbs because I think (on my experience) it produces way much simpler debian/rules, especially now that we have to also support hardening flags and we build both a binary and a library package. Also, if you recall the discussion on the license of debian/* files, I would appreciate a word on what license the packaging (debian/*) files should be put under. Did Martin ever agree to the packaging helper conversion, maybe offlist (uploader CCed)? Otherwise such stuff is completely unacceptable for an NMU. Thanks, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#485492: Bug#694611:
That was discussed also in order to accept the package after it got in NEW (it includes a new binary for libraries) and the maintainer had no objections. http://www.webpagescreenshot.info/i/83-312013102255PM.png Best regards, Nick -- =Do- N.AND 2013/3/1 Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org: On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 00:54:11 +0100, Nick Andrik wrote: 2013/1/22 Martin Meredith mar...@sourceguru.net: Why the confersion to cdbs? Ca I gets a debdiff? I switched to cdbs because I think (on my experience) it produces way much simpler debian/rules, especially now that we have to also support hardening flags and we build both a binary and a library package. Also, if you recall the discussion on the license of debian/* files, I would appreciate a word on what license the packaging (debian/*) files should be put under. Did Martin ever agree to the packaging helper conversion, maybe offlist (uploader CCed)? Otherwise such stuff is completely unacceptable for an NMU. Thanks, Guillem -- To unsubscribe, send mail to 485492-unsubscr...@bugs.debian.org. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#485492:
I have prepared an NMU closing 3 bugs included this one. The updated package can be found on mentors [1] Martin, I know the package is in lowNMU [2] category, but the the changes are not trivial (general cleanup, conversion to CDBS, closing 3 bugs). So, according to the instuctions in the NMU process [3] I would like to ask your permission to go forward. In any case, I am also offering to adopt the package if for any reason this way is more conveninet for you Best regards, Nick [1] http://mentors.debian.net/package/unrar-nonfree [2] http://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdNmu [3] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#485492: Bug#694611:
Why the confersion to cdbs? Ca I gets a debdiff? On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Nick Andrik nick.and...@gmail.com wrote: I have prepared an NMU closing 3 bugs included this one. The updated package can be found on mentors [1] Martin, I know the package is in lowNMU [2] category, but the the changes are not trivial (general cleanup, conversion to CDBS, closing 3 bugs). So, according to the instuctions in the NMU process [3] I would like to ask your permission to go forward. In any case, I am also offering to adopt the package if for any reason this way is more conveninet for you Best regards, Nick [1] http://mentors.debian.net/package/unrar-nonfree [2] http://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdNmu [3] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu
Bug#485492:
I made a first attempt to also build the shared library of the package. You can find an updated source package on the mentors site: https://mentors.debian.net/package/unrar-nonfree The changes needed is an updated debian/rules file and a patch in makefile.unix from upstream. I didn't split the package into two (library/binary), if this is needed please let me know. I attach the debdiff between the previous and the new version Hope this issue is resolved so that we can finally have CBR support in calibre. -- =Do- N.AND debdiff_4.1.4-1_4.1.4-1+andrik1.patch Description: Binary data
Bug#485492:
Actually my 4.1.4 package would crash calibre when trying to extract CBR files but the updated 4.2.4 (most recent upstream) seems to work just fine. You can always find both versions on mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/package/unrar-nonfree Nick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#485492: LPARAM definition
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 05:20:08PM +0100, Fran wrote: It's already fixed in the 3.8.5 source: http://www.rarlab.com/rar/unrarsrc-3.8.5.tar.gz Is there any chance that this could be fixed soon? -- Miguel Landaeta, miguel at miguel.cc secure email with PGP 0x7D8967E9 available at http://keyserver.pgp.com/ Faith means not wanting to know what is true. -- Nietzsche signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#485492: LPARAM definition
Hi Try adding #define LPARAM long in #ifdef _UNIX: #ifdef _UNIX #define CALLBACK #define PASCAL #define LONG long #define HANDLE void * #define LPARAM long #define UINT unsigned int #endif It's already fixed in the 3.8.5 source: http://www.rarlab.com/rar/unrarsrc-3.8.5.tar.gz Regards -- Fran -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#485492:
tags 485492 +help thanks Seems upstream isn't taking an interest in this. Anyone want to have a look and try and help? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#485492:
forwarded 485492 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks It's refusing to compile the libs stuff for me - compiling the DLL requires a definition for LPARAM I can't fix this myself - have forwarded the bug upstream signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#485492: unrar: Please build shared library
Package: unrar
Version: 1:3.7.8-2
Severity: wishlist
The unrar source distribution contains code to enable building a
shared library that can be linked to by other programs. Please provide
libunrar{-dev} packages.
Thanks,
-Hilko
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages unrar depends on:
ii libc6 2.7-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libgcc1 1:4.3.0-5 GCC support library
ii libstdc++64.3.0-5The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
unrar recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
