Bug#485492: Bug#694611:
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 00:54:11 +0100, Nick Andrik wrote: 2013/1/22 Martin Meredith mar...@sourceguru.net: Why the confersion to cdbs? Ca I gets a debdiff? I switched to cdbs because I think (on my experience) it produces way much simpler debian/rules, especially now that we have to also support hardening flags and we build both a binary and a library package. Also, if you recall the discussion on the license of debian/* files, I would appreciate a word on what license the packaging (debian/*) files should be put under. Did Martin ever agree to the packaging helper conversion, maybe offlist (uploader CCed)? Otherwise such stuff is completely unacceptable for an NMU. Thanks, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#485492: Bug#694611:
That was discussed also in order to accept the package after it got in NEW (it includes a new binary for libraries) and the maintainer had no objections. http://www.webpagescreenshot.info/i/83-312013102255PM.png Best regards, Nick -- =Do- N.AND 2013/3/1 Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org: On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 00:54:11 +0100, Nick Andrik wrote: 2013/1/22 Martin Meredith mar...@sourceguru.net: Why the confersion to cdbs? Ca I gets a debdiff? I switched to cdbs because I think (on my experience) it produces way much simpler debian/rules, especially now that we have to also support hardening flags and we build both a binary and a library package. Also, if you recall the discussion on the license of debian/* files, I would appreciate a word on what license the packaging (debian/*) files should be put under. Did Martin ever agree to the packaging helper conversion, maybe offlist (uploader CCed)? Otherwise such stuff is completely unacceptable for an NMU. Thanks, Guillem -- To unsubscribe, send mail to 485492-unsubscr...@bugs.debian.org. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#485492: Bug#694611:
Why the confersion to cdbs? Ca I gets a debdiff? On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Nick Andrik nick.and...@gmail.com wrote: I have prepared an NMU closing 3 bugs included this one. The updated package can be found on mentors [1] Martin, I know the package is in lowNMU [2] category, but the the changes are not trivial (general cleanup, conversion to CDBS, closing 3 bugs). So, according to the instuctions in the NMU process [3] I would like to ask your permission to go forward. In any case, I am also offering to adopt the package if for any reason this way is more conveninet for you Best regards, Nick [1] http://mentors.debian.net/package/unrar-nonfree [2] http://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdNmu [3] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu
