Bug#486340: debian/copyright needs updating

2008-06-23 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 08:43:54 +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:

 While having a few files without any license indication (as long as it's 
 not all rights reserved. without further note, restricted property 
 of...) in a agglomerate that is otherwise fairly homogeneous is 
 suboptimal, it is not something the FTP team currently takes issue with 
 if it is clear that these files have not just been ripped from some other 
 place.[1] As such a debian/copyright featuring Moritz' conclusions is 
 would be enough to resolve my concerns w.r.t this bug being RC / NEW 
 review for the etch+1/2 packages.

x-x-v-intel 2:2.2.1-1~etchnhalf2 uploaded, using Moritz' work on the
copyright file.  This will also be fixed in the next upload to unstable.
Thanks to both of you for the report and analysis!

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#486340: debian/copyright needs updating

2008-06-18 Thread Thomas Viehmann
On 2008-06-18 07:38:30.00 Brice Goglin [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:

Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
 I don't expect any problems, but that should be resolved
 upstream. Brice, can you take care of this? You probably
 know better who to prod.



I just sent it to the intel-gfx list, I'll let you know what
happens. If nothing comes, I'll open a bug report upstream.


While having a few files without any license indication (as long as  
it's not all rights reserved. without further note, restricted  
property of...) in a agglomerate that is otherwise fairly  
homogeneous is suboptimal, it is not something the FTP team currently  
takes issue with if it is clear that these files have not just been  
ripped from some other place.[1] As such a debian/copyright featuring  
Moritz' conclusions is would be enough to resolve my concerns w.r.t  
this bug being RC / NEW review for the etch+1/2 packages.


Kind regards

T.

1. A sample I looked at apparently came from XFree86 at the switch to  
X.org, which to me seems fine in terms provenance.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#486340: debian/copyright needs updating

2008-06-18 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Brice Goglin wrote:

  the debian/copyright of xserver-xorg-video-intel is so outdated it has
  little to do with the rest of the package when it comes to who owns
  which copyrights.
  It would be good to go over the source and extract the relevant
  copyright notices. Note that per-file annotations are not required, so
  that copyright notices of files with the same license can easily be
  agglomerated.
  
 
  I can work on this unless anyone from the X Strike Force is already on it.

 
 Since Julien is in vacation, I am probably the only real candidate for
 doing this in XSF. But I have some other important XSF stuff to do right
 now so I'd be happy if you could do it.

I'm attaching a complete version. It features explicit per-file annotations
since they will be needed at a later point anyway when switching to machine
parsable copyright files. Also, upstream asks for a more complete copyright
file to be submitted in COPYING, so I rather fixed it the clean way.

Some source code files don't contain copyright assignment headers (see
at the end of attached file). The Makefile.am's and the g4b seem harmless
since they're likely to little to be copyrightable at all, but the following
should be checked with upstream:

src/tfp410/tfp410_module.c
src/ch7xxx/ch7xxx_module.c
src/ch7017/ch7017_module.c
src/xvmc/i915_program.h
src/xvmc/intel_batchbuffer.h
src/scripts/clock-graph.5c
src/scripts/clock.5c
src/scripts/fix.5c
src/scripts/tv.5c
src/sil164/sil164_module.c
src/i810_dri.h
src/i810_dri.c
src/i830_dri.h

I don't expect any problems, but that should be resolved upstream. Brice, can 
you
take care of this? You probably know better who to prod.

Cheers,
Moritz
This copyright file is based on 2.3.1

The authors of this core are, see below for copyright declarations.

* Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Bob Paauwe  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Dave Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Jens Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Jesse Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Jonathan Bian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Keith Packard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Keith Whitwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Kevin E. Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Kristian HÞgsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Luc Verhaegen
* Matt Sottek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Rickard E. (Rik) Faith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Thomas Hellstrom
* Wang Zhenyu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Xiang Haihao [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Most of the code is covered by the MIT/X11 license:

-
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
copy of this software and associated documentation files (the
Software), to deal in the Software without restriction, including
without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish,
distribute, sub license, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to
permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to
the following conditions:
 
The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the
next paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions
of the Software.
 
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED AS IS, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NON-INFRINGEMENT.
IN NO EVENT SHALL TUNGSTEN GRAPHICS AND/OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR
ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT,
TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE
SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
-

The copyright holders are:

* Copyright 1998-1999 Precision Insight, Inc., Cedar Park, Texas:
src/i810_accel.c
src/i810_wmark.c
src/i810_reg.h
src/i810_driver.c
src/i810_memory.c
src/i810_io.c
src/i810_cursor.c
src/i830_accel.c
src/i830_xaa.c
src/i830_exa.c

* Copyright 1998-1999 Precision Insight, Inc., Cedar Park, Texas.
* Copyright 2000 VA Linux Systems, Inc.
src/xvmc/xf86dri.h
src/xvmc/xf86dri.c

* Copyright 1998-1999 Precision Insight, Inc., Cedar Park, Texas.
* Copyright 2002 David Dawes
src/i830_memory.c
src/i830.h
src/i830_ring.h
src/i830_cursor.c
src/i810_ring.h
src/i810.h
src/common.h
src/xvmc/xf86dristr.h

* Copyright 2000 Intel Corporation.  All Rights Reserved:
src/i810_hwmc.c
src/i830_video.h
src/i810_video.c
src/i830_video.c

* Copyright 2001 Intel Corporation.  All Rights Reserved.
src/xvmc/I810XvMC.h
src/xvmc/I810XvMC.c

* Copyright 2001 VA Linux Systems Inc., Fremont, California.
* Copyright 2002 by David Dawes
src/i830_dri.c
src/i830_driver.c

* Copyright 2001 VA Linux Systems Inc., Fremont, California.
* Copyright 2002 Tungsten Graphics Inc., Cedar Park, Texas.
src/i830_common.h

* Copyright 2002 David Dawes
* Copyright 2006 Intel Corporation
src/i830_modes.c

* Copyright 2002 Tungsten Graphics, Inc., Cedar Park, Texas.
src/i810_common.h

* Copyright 2003 Tungsten Graphics, Inc., Cedar Park, Texas.
src/i830_reg.h  
src/i830_3d.c
src/i915_3d.c
src/i915_reg.h

Bug#486340: debian/copyright needs updating

2008-06-17 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Unfortunately I had forgotten about finding someone after trying to
catch Julien on IRC (sorry), so given that Brice agrees, your efforts
are doubly appreciated!
Note that the same debian/copyright seems to be needed for the etch+1/2.

Kind regards

T.
-- 
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#486340: debian/copyright needs updating

2008-06-17 Thread Brice Goglin
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
 I don't expect any problems, but that should be resolved upstream. Brice, can 
 you
 take care of this? You probably know better who to prod.
   

I just sent it to the intel-gfx list, I'll let you know what happens. If
nothing comes, I'll open a bug report upstream.

thanks a lot,
Brice




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#486340: debian/copyright needs updating

2008-06-16 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Thomas Viehmann wrote:

 the debian/copyright of xserver-xorg-video-intel is so outdated it has
 little to do with the rest of the package when it comes to who owns
 which copyrights.
 It would be good to go over the source and extract the relevant
 copyright notices. Note that per-file annotations are not required, so
 that copyright notices of files with the same license can easily be
 agglomerated.

I can work on this unless anyone from the X Strike Force is already on it.

Cheers,
Moritz



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#486340: debian/copyright needs updating

2008-06-16 Thread Brice Goglin
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
 Thomas Viehmann wrote:

   
 the debian/copyright of xserver-xorg-video-intel is so outdated it has
 little to do with the rest of the package when it comes to who owns
 which copyrights.
 It would be good to go over the source and extract the relevant
 copyright notices. Note that per-file annotations are not required, so
 that copyright notices of files with the same license can easily be
 agglomerated.
 

 I can work on this unless anyone from the X Strike Force is already on it.
   

Since Julien is in vacation, I am probably the only real candidate for
doing this in XSF. But I have some other important XSF stuff to do right
now so I'd be happy if you could do it.

thanks
Brice




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#486340: debian/copyright needs updating

2008-06-15 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Severity: serious
Version: 2:2.3.1-1

Hi,

the debian/copyright of xserver-xorg-video-intel is so outdated it has
little to do with the rest of the package when it comes to who owns
which copyrights.
It would be good to go over the source and extract the relevant
copyright notices. Note that per-file annotations are not required, so
that copyright notices of files with the same license can easily be
agglomerated.

Kind regards

T.
-- 
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]