Bug#488719: xulrunner-1.9: Bad transparency in progress mill icon
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 08:48:52PM +0200, Krzysztof Sobolewski wrote: Tuesday 01 of July 2008 07:27:33 Mike Hommey napisał(a): After today update (xulrunner-1.9 1.9~rc2-4 - 1.9~rc2-5) the progress icon (the mill) seems that have one transparency problem. Well, yes, animated gifs, are uglier than APNGs, but we can't support them. See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=487556#10. But doesn't GIF have transparency? Even animated? GIF has masked transparency, which is why you don't see a white square behind the mill. It is also why it looks bad on non-white background. Maybe it could be made better, though. If you feel like it, you can try to produce a better one with your favourite image editor. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#488719: xulrunner-1.9: Bad transparency in progress mill icon
Tuesday 01 of July 2008 07:27:33 Mike Hommey napisał(a): After today update (xulrunner-1.9 1.9~rc2-4 - 1.9~rc2-5) the progress icon (the mill) seems that have one transparency problem. Well, yes, animated gifs, are uglier than APNGs, but we can't support them. See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=487556#10. But doesn't GIF have transparency? Even animated? -- Ecce Jezuch Can't hate me like I do, I know me better - J. S. Clayden signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#488719: xulrunner-1.9: Bad transparency in progress mill icon
Package: xulrunner-1.9 Version: 1.9~rc2-5 Severity: minor After today update (xulrunner-1.9 1.9~rc2-4 - 1.9~rc2-5) the progress icon (the mill) seems that have one transparency problem. Screenshot in http://itaca.bitassa.cat/~benjami/tmp/iceweasel-mill-transparency.png Best resgards. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages xulrunner-1.9 depends on: ii libatk1.0-01.22.0-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.5-0.1 high-quality block-sorting file co ii libc6 2.7-12GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcairo2 1.6.4-6 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libfontconfig1 2.6.0-1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.3.6-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc11:4.3.1-3 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.16.3-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-02.12.10-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libhunspell-1.2-0 1.2.4-2 spell checker and morphological an ii libjpeg62 6b-14 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii liblcms1 1.16-10 Color management library ii libmozjs1d 1.9~rc2-5 The Mozilla SpiderMonkey JavaScrip ii libnspr4-0d4.7.1-3 NetScape Portable Runtime Library ii libnss3-1d 3.12.0~rc3-3 Network Security Service libraries ii libpango1.0-0 1.20.3-2 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-0 1.2.27-1 PNG library - runtime ii libreadline5 5.2-3 GNU readline and history libraries ii libsqlite3-0 3.5.9-3 SQLite 3 shared library ii libstartup-notificatio 0.9-1 library for program launch feedbac ii libstdc++6 4.3.1-3 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 2:1.1.4-2 X11 client-side library ii libxrender11:0.9.4-2 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 1:1.0.5-3 X11 toolkit intrinsics library ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12 compression library - runtime xulrunner-1.9 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#488719: xulrunner-1.9: Bad transparency in progress mill icon
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:33:12PM +0200, Benjamí Villoslada wrote: Package: xulrunner-1.9 Version: 1.9~rc2-5 Severity: minor After today update (xulrunner-1.9 1.9~rc2-4 - 1.9~rc2-5) the progress icon (the mill) seems that have one transparency problem. Screenshot in http://itaca.bitassa.cat/~benjami/tmp/iceweasel-mill-transparency.png Well, yes, animated gifs, are uglier than APNGs, but we can't support them. See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=487556#10. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
