Bug#490389: [Pkg-vsquare-devel] Bug#490389: Patch to fix FTBFS on amd64
tags 490389 + unreproducible moreinfo thanks On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 08:49:02PM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote: The included patch fixes purelibc on amd64. It will likely also help fix I see no FTBS issues for purelibc-0.4-1 on amd64. Which version are you referring to? Thanks, Ludovico -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]#acheronte (irc.freenode.net) ICQ: 64483080 GPG ID: 07F89BB8 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo: gardenghelle -- This is signature nr. 4072 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#490389: [Pkg-vsquare-devel] Bug#490389: Patch to fix FTBFS on amd64
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 There is no build log on Debian on AMD64, this patch was required to get it building on Ubuntu where it FTBFS on all architectures aside from i686. I should have made this more clear in my email. The package was synced from Ubuntu without changes, and has never been modified until that patch was applied to it (creating 0.4.1-1ubuntu1). It's possible that the specific issue that effected it on Ubuntu isn't true on Debian, or the package hasn't been built recently on amd64 and thus hasn't had an opportunity to fail. Michael -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://getfiregpg.org iD8DBQFIeK3ApblTBJ2i2psRArB1AJ4vFnwxldBdWZVVJjKPJlekEP+ZqwCfYu8d 027lKFVCIgGusu5PGieMKdU= =SWhB -END PGP SIGNATURE- On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Ludovico Gardenghi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tags 490389 + unreproducible moreinfo thanks On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 08:49:02PM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote: The included patch fixes purelibc on amd64. It will likely also help fix I see no FTBS issues for purelibc-0.4-1 on amd64. Which version are you referring to? Thanks, Ludovico -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]#acheronte (irc.freenode.net) ICQ: 64483080 GPG ID: 07F89BB8 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo: gardenghelle -- This is signature nr. 4072
Bug#490389: [Pkg-vsquare-devel] Bug#490389: Patch to fix FTBFS on amd64
severity 490389 minor retitle 490389 Patch to fix FTBFS on amd64 and glibc 2.8 tags 490389 - moreinfo unreproducible tags 490389 + fixed-upstream upstream thanks On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 09:12:32AM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote: There is no build log on Debian on AMD64, this patch was required to get it building on Ubuntu where it FTBFS on all architectures aside from i686. I should have made this more clear in my email. There is no log on Debian because the amd64 binary has been uploaded by the mantainer, but it seems to compile fine also on this architecture. As far as Debian is concerned, there is no FTBFS error so I'm lowering the severity. If I understand correctly (next time, please give us some more details, like the buildd output -- not just a patch!) the problem of a missing stdlib.h is that NULL won't get defined. Somehow, it appears to be defined nevertheless with glibc 2.7: we #include sys/types.h that #includes stddef.h that defines NULL. You're using glibc 2.8 and things are probably different. Anyway, since it's a Good Thing to include stdlib.h if you want to use NULL, I applied the patch to the upstream SVN, so the next upstream release will be fixed. If I'm missing something, please tell me. Ludovico -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]#acheronte (irc.freenode.net) ICQ: 64483080 GPG ID: 07F89BB8 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo: gardenghelle -- This is signature nr. 4073 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
