Bug#492699: fakeroot includes disallowed files by FHS
For i386 the fakeroot package does not contain files/dirs in /emul/ia32-linux/. However it does contain a /usr/lib64/libfakeroot/ directory, and in fact is the only package on my (very bloated) Desktop that has files in /usr/lib64/. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/fakeroot$ dpkg -c fakeroot_1.9.6_i386.deb ... drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-08-02 11:28 ./usr/lib/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-08-02 11:29 ./usr/lib/libfakeroot/ -rwxr-xr-x root/root 27692 2008-08-02 11:29 ./usr/lib/libfakeroot/libfakeroot-sysv.so -rwxr-xr-x root/root 28960 2008-08-02 11:29 ./usr/lib/libfakeroot/libfakeroot-tcp.so ... drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-08-02 11:29 ./usr/lib64/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-08-02 11:29 ./usr/lib64/libfakeroot/ -rwxr-xr-x root/root 41264 2008-08-02 11:29 ./usr/lib64/libfakeroot/libfakeroot-sysv.so -rwxr-xr-x root/root 41344 2008-08-02 11:29 ./usr/lib64/libfakeroot/libfakeroot-tcp.so ... are the /usr/lib64/ files necessary for the non-64-bit i386 arch? i.e. is there a reason they are in the i386 package? -- Chris -- Chris Knadle [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#492699: fakeroot includes disallowed files by FHS
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 03:50:41AM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote: ... are the /usr/lib64/ files necessary for the non-64-bit i386 arch? i.e. is there a reason they are in the i386 package? If you have i386 installed on a 64-bit machine, you can use them to run fakeroot on 64-bit binaries. Otherwise it won't work. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#492699: fakeroot includes disallowed files by FHS
On Sunday 03 August 2008, Clint Adams wrote: On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 03:50:41AM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote: ... are the /usr/lib64/ files necessary for the non-64-bit i386 arch? i.e. is there a reason they are in the i386 package? If you have i386 installed on a 64-bit machine, you can use them to run fakeroot on 64-bit binaries. Otherwise it won't work. I see. There shouldn't be 64-bit binaries in i386, so this is to support a 64-bit box running a hybrid 32-bit/64-bit setup. Ehh -- okay. Re: /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib -- would using /usr/lib32 even though it's a symlink make a policy compliant package? -- Chris -- Chris Knadle [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#492699: fakeroot includes disallowed files by FHS
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 04:01:55PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote: I see. There shouldn't be 64-bit binaries in i386, so this is to support a 64-bit box running a hybrid 32-bit/64-bit setup. Ehh -- okay. This happens quite a bit. Re: /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib -- would using /usr/lib32 even though it's a symlink make a policy compliant package? Yes, but it would break these packages: lib32nss-mdns gnu-efi lib32asound2-dev lib32bz2-dev lib32ffi-dev lib32icu-dev lib32ncurses5-dev lib32ncursesw5-dev lib32readline5-dev lib32stdc++6-4.1-dbg lib32stdc++6-4.2-dbg lib32stdc++6-4.2-dbg lib32stdc++6-4.3-dbg lib32z1-dev libc6-dev-i386 ia32-libs ia32-libs-gtk lib32asound2 lib32bz2-1.0 lib32ffi5 lib32gcc1 lib32gfortran2 lib32gfortran3 lib32gomp1 lib32icu38 lib32mudflap0 lib32ncurses5 lib32ncursesw5 lib32objc2 lib32readline5 lib32stdc++6 lib32z1 libc6-i386 fakechroot -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
