Bug#495211: #495211 - libatomic-ops FTBFS on powerpc
* Adeodato Simó [Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:29:59 +0200]: > * Mike O'Connor [Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:39:29 -0400]: > > OK, I've uploaded 1.2-4+lenny1 to testing-proposed-updates. > Thanks, we'll migrate it to testing once it's built for all > architectures. Builds got in finally, unblocked. -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Listening to: Dar Williams - February -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#495211: #495211 - libatomic-ops FTBFS on powerpc
* Mike O'Connor [Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:39:29 -0400]: > OK, I've uploaded 1.2-4+lenny1 to testing-proposed-updates. Thanks, we'll migrate it to testing once it's built for all architectures. -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Que no te vendan amor sin espinas -- Joaquín Sabina, Noches de boda -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#495211: #495211 - libatomic-ops FTBFS on powerpc
OK, I've uploaded 1.2-4+lenny1 to testing-proposed-updates. Below is the interdiff between 1.2-4 and 1.2.4+lenny1: diff -u libatomic-ops-1.2/debian/patches/05_powerpc_asm.patch libatomic-ops-1.2/debian/patches/05_powerpc_asm.patch --- libatomic-ops-1.2/debian/patches/05_powerpc_asm.patch +++ libatomic-ops-1.2/debian/patches/05_powerpc_asm.patch @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ /* tried the "y" constraint.*/ __asm__ __volatile__ ( -"lwz %0,%1\n" -+"lwz%X1 %0,%1\n" ++"lwz%U1%X1 %0,%1\n" "cmpw cr7,%0,%0\n" "bne- cr7,1f\n" "1: isync\n" diff -u libatomic-ops-1.2/debian/changelog libatomic-ops-1.2/debian/changelog --- libatomic-ops-1.2/debian/changelog +++ libatomic-ops-1.2/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +libatomic-ops (1.2-4+lenny1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * fixed debian/patches/05_powerpc_asm.patch to get it building on ppc again +(Closes: 495211) + * Uploading to testing-proposed-updates to fix the bug for lenny, becuase +the cvs version in unstable isn't a valid candidate for a freeze +exception. + + -- Mike O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:26:06 -0400 + libatomic-ops (1.2-4) unstable; urgency=low * Closes: #463390 -- Add 06_double.patch to fix some issues with double signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#495211: #495211 - libatomic-ops FTBFS on powerpc
* Mike O'Connor [Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:08:59 -0400]: > May I NMU my fix to T-P-U to fix this bug? Yes, and thanks for digging up the fix. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Listening to: Rosa León - ¡Ay, amor! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#495211: #495211 - libatomic-ops FTBFS on powerpc
My apologies, I forgot about this. Please NMU if you have a fix -i On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Mike O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Release managers, > > This bug was fixed in sid by uploading a new cvs pull of the upstream > source, which HE as noted, was not acceptable for a freeze exception. I > have prepared and tested a minimal fix of this bug to the version of > this package in lenny, which consists of a one line change to a file in > debian/patches. I asked the maintainer if he plans to upload a > fix to T-P-U and have not heard from him. > > May I NMU my fix to T-P-U to fix this bug? > > Thanks, > > stew > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkjtL3sACgkQ9Cbhsr6b+NpjKACeM4uiI36rMQcH9guweUrXe9mH > vVQAoI/O9vcJaXjX+U23fi9VX+8KlpjZ > =IvBf > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#495211: #495211 - libatomic-ops FTBFS on powerpc
Release managers, This bug was fixed in sid by uploading a new cvs pull of the upstream source, which HE as noted, was not acceptable for a freeze exception. I have prepared and tested a minimal fix of this bug to the version of this package in lenny, which consists of a one line change to a file in debian/patches. I asked the maintainer if he plans to upload a fix to T-P-U and have not heard from him. May I NMU my fix to T-P-U to fix this bug? Thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
