Bug#496800: [pkg-mono-group] Bug#496800: Bug#496800: dependency problem between mono and mono-common and mono-jit
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 10:31 +0200, Frans Luteijn wrote: > Hallo, > > Mono-devel 1.2.5.1-1+lenny1, which has a dependency to mono 1.2.5.1-1 > +lenny1, should be removed then also to prevent the same problems. I've asked that the entire 1.2.5.1-1+lenny1 source package be removed. Meanwhile, use mono-1.0-devel or mono-2.0-devel, which are part of the 1.9.1 packages actually in lenny. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#496800: [pkg-mono-group] Bug#496800: Bug#496800: dependency problem between mono and mono-common and mono-jit
Hallo, Mono-devel 1.2.5.1-1+lenny1, which has a dependency to mono 1.2.5.1-1+lenny1, should be removed then also to prevent the same problems. Yours sincerely, Frans Luteijn. Xout Europe BV De Virieusingel 4 P.O. Box 223 5300 AE Zaltbommel The Netherlands P: +31(0)88 77 88 200 F: +31(0)88 77 88 299 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.xout.eu Jo Shields wrote: > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 17:50 +0200, Frans Luteijn wrote: > >> It is a fresh install without any old dependicies. When I select mono >> I don't expect such dependicy problems which cannot normally be >> solved. >> >> It should normally be build with the right version or it should not be >> in the repository. >> > > You're right. It should not. And it's NOT a problem in Lenny, which does > not contain any binary package called "mono", nor a problem with the > Debian Mono packages, which haven't produced a "mono" binary for a long > time. > > The problem lies in testing-security, which uploaded a security update > in November 2007 to security.debian.org - which was superceded 2 weeks > later. We (the Mono team) have no ability to remove the obsolete problem > package from the FTP servers. > > We have now opened a bug against ftp.debian.org, at > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=496806 - That's the > place to target complaints about this problem, which are completely > beyond our control. > >
Bug#496800: [pkg-mono-group] Bug#496800: Bug#496800: dependency problem between mono and mono-common and mono-jit
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 17:50 +0200, Frans Luteijn wrote: > It is a fresh install without any old dependicies. When I select mono > I don't expect such dependicy problems which cannot normally be > solved. > > It should normally be build with the right version or it should not be > in the repository. You're right. It should not. And it's NOT a problem in Lenny, which does not contain any binary package called "mono", nor a problem with the Debian Mono packages, which haven't produced a "mono" binary for a long time. The problem lies in testing-security, which uploaded a security update in November 2007 to security.debian.org - which was superceded 2 weeks later. We (the Mono team) have no ability to remove the obsolete problem package from the FTP servers. We have now opened a bug against ftp.debian.org, at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=496806 - That's the place to target complaints about this problem, which are completely beyond our control. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#496800: [pkg-mono-group] Bug#496800: dependency problem between mono and mono-common and mono-jit
It is a fresh install without any old dependicies. When I select mono I don't expect such dependicy problems which cannot normally be solved. It should normally be build with the right version or it should not be in the repository. Met vriendelijke groet, Frans Luteijn. Xout Europe BV De Virieusingel 4 P.O. Box 223 5300 AE Zaltbommel The Netherlands P: +31(0)88 77 88 200 F: +31(0)88 77 88 299 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.xout.eu Jo Shields wrote: > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 16:48 +0200, F. Luteijn wrote: > >> Package: mono >> Version: 1.2.5.1-1+lenny1 >> Severity: normal >> >> Mono is dependent on mono-common (= 1.2.5.1-1+lenny1) and mono-jit >> (= 1.2.5.1-1+lenny1), but those packages are not available. Installing mono >> (and mono-dev also) will fail and installing mono-common or mono-jit will >> remove mono. >> > > Remove mono. It's a useless metapackage which was removed ages ago - and > is still causing us problems like this because there appears to be no > mechanism for removing obsolete packages from testing-security. > >
Bug#496800: [pkg-mono-group] Bug#496800: dependency problem between mono and mono-common and mono-jit
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 16:48 +0200, F. Luteijn wrote: > Package: mono > Version: 1.2.5.1-1+lenny1 > Severity: normal > > Mono is dependent on mono-common (= 1.2.5.1-1+lenny1) and mono-jit > (= 1.2.5.1-1+lenny1), but those packages are not available. Installing mono > (and mono-dev also) will fail and installing mono-common or mono-jit will > remove mono. Remove mono. It's a useless metapackage which was removed ages ago - and is still causing us problems like this because there appears to be no mechanism for removing obsolete packages from testing-security. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#496800: dependency problem between mono and mono-common and mono-jit
Package: mono Version: 1.2.5.1-1+lenny1 Severity: normal Mono is dependent on mono-common (= 1.2.5.1-1+lenny1) and mono-jit (= 1.2.5.1-1+lenny1), but those packages are not available. Installing mono (and mono-dev also) will fail and installing mono-common or mono-jit will remove mono. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages mono depends on: ii mono-common 1.9.1+dfsg-3 common files for Mono ii mono-jit1.9.1+dfsg-3 fast CLI JIT/AOT compiler for Mono Versions of packages mono recommends: ii libgdiplus 1.9-1interface library for Mono class S ii libmono-corlib1.0-cil 1.9.1+dfsg-3 Mono core library (1.0) mono suggests no packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
