I suggest the following:

--- sensors.conf.5      2008-11-12 00:03:43.000000000 +0200
+++ sensors.conf.5.new  2008-11-12 00:12:18.000000000 +0200
@@ -394,6 +394,13 @@
 and there is anywhere else a statement for this specific class member,
 that one takes always precedence.

+.SH NOTES
+The ALARM flag is not computed from the values, but it is a flag returned
+by the chip. It means that between the previous reading and this reading, one
+or both of the limits have been crossed. There fore, there is no bug within
+the software with the following output:
+-12V:       -12.96 V  (min = -11.40 V, max = -13.18 V)   ALARM
+
 .SH FILES
 .I /etc/sensors3.conf
 .br

--- sensors.1   2008-11-12 00:11:12.000000000 +0200
+++ sensors.1.new       2008-11-12 00:11:00.000000000 +0200
@@ -73,6 +73,12 @@
 buses of the same type. As bus numbers are usually not guaranteed to be stable
 over reboots, these statements let you refer to each bus by its name rather
 than numbers.
+.SH NOTES
+The ALARM flag is not computed from the values, but it is a flag returned
+by the chip. It means that between the previous reading and this reading, one
+or both of the limits have been crossed. There fore, there is no bug within
+the software with the following output:
+-12V:       -12.96 V  (min = -11.40 V, max = -13.18 V)   ALARM
 .SH FILES
 .I /etc/sensors3.conf
 .br



--- On Fri, 11/7/08, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Bug#504809 closed by Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re:  
> Bug#504809: -12V:       -12.96 V  (min = -11.40 V, max = -13.18 V)    ALARM)
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Friday, November 7, 2008, 5:51 PM
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the lm-sensors package:
> 
> #504809: -12V:       -12.96 V  (min = -11.40 V, max =
> -13.18 V)   ALARM
> 
> It has been closed by Aurelien Jarno
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> 
> Their explanation is attached below along with your
> original report.
> If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not
> received a
> better one in a separate message then please contact
> Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> by
> replying to this email.
> 
> 
> -- 
> 504809:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=504809
> Debian Bug Tracking System
> Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems


      



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to