Bug#507536: eclipse: fails to start if xulrunner 1.9.1 is installed

2009-10-17 Thread Niels Thykier

# This is the same problem really - just represented differently
# in different versions and later versions support xulrunner 1.9
forcemerge 507536 538871
retitle 507536 eclipse: fails to start due to xulrunner
tags 507536 = confirmed
severity 507536 grave
# These two are solved by the same solution.
forcemerge 402340 403675
retitle 402340 eclipse: Remove integrated browser warning - Doesnt work
tags 402340 = confirmed pending
severity 507536 important
thanks

Hi Sebastian

Thank you for taking your time to confirm this.

Also you can ignore the No support for integrated browsing warning - at 
best it is actually correct, but often it is wrong. We will definitely 
remove that in the next version of eclipse (see #402340 and #528070 for 
more info on this)


~Niels



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#507536: I am able to reproduce the error in a complete pristine squeeze installation

2009-10-11 Thread Enrique
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.2.2-6.1
Severity: normal


 I have performed a fresh installation of squeeze and installed eclipse, which 
shows the error:
searching for compatible vm...
  testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk...found
Could not create /usr/local/lib/eclipse/.eclipseextension. Please run as root:
touch /usr/local/lib/eclipse/.eclipseextension
chmod 2775 /usr/local/lib/eclipse/.eclipseextension
chown root:staff /usr/local/lib/eclipse/.eclipseextension
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/bin/java: symbol lookup error: 
/home/cgarcia/.eclipse/org.eclipse.platform_3.2.0/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/bundles/86/1/.cp/libswt-mozilla-gtk-3236.so:
 undefined symbol: _ZN4nsID5ParseEPKc

 Installing xulrunner-dev solves the problem. So I think that xulrunner-dev 
should be definetively a required package for eclipse.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to es_ES.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages eclipse depends on:
ii  eclipse-jdt   3.2.2-6.1  Java Development Tools plug-ins fo
ii  eclipse-pde   3.2.2-6.1  Plug-in Development Environment to
ii  eclipse-source3.2.2-6.1  Eclipse source code plug-ins
ii  libc6 2.9-25 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.22.0-1   The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.16.6-1   The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  zenity2.28.0-1   Display graphical dialog boxes fro

Versions of packages eclipse recommends:
ii  eclipse-gcj   3.2.2-6.1  Native Eclipse run with GCJ

eclipse suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#507536: eclipse: undefined symbol: _ZN4nsID5ParseEPKc

2009-08-19 Thread Vincent Smeets
Hallo,

eclipse is now working OK. I have the following xulrunner packages
installed. I haven't xulrunner-dev installed.

vinc...@pc-vincent:~$ dpkg-query -l xulrunner*
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err:
uppercase=bad)
||/ NameVersion Description
+++-===-===-==
un  xulrunner   none  (no
description available)
ii  xulrunner-1.9   1.9.0.11-0lenny1XUL + XPCOM
application runner
un  xulrunner-1.9-commonnone  (no
description available)
un  xulrunner-1.9-gnome-support none  (no
description available)


Regards,
Vincent


Niels Thykier wrote:
 Hi

 Those of you who have experienced this problem, could you please write
 which version of xulrunner you have and whether it fixed it?

 Those you still experiencing the problem, please check if your version
 of xulrunner is listed here[1] next to the matching version of eclipse.
 At least xulrunner 1.9.1 have broken backwards compatibility[2].

 ~Niels

 [1] http://www.eclipse.org/swt/faq.php#browserlinux
 [2] http://glandium.org/blog/?p=416

   



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#507536: eclipse: undefined symbol: _ZN4nsID5ParseEPKc

2009-08-17 Thread Niels Thykier
Hi

Those of you who have experienced this problem, could you please write
which version of xulrunner you have and whether it fixed it?

Those you still experiencing the problem, please check if your version
of xulrunner is listed here[1] next to the matching version of eclipse.
At least xulrunner 1.9.1 have broken backwards compatibility[2].

~Niels

[1] http://www.eclipse.org/swt/faq.php#browserlinux
[2] http://glandium.org/blog/?p=416



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#507536: Runs without installing xulrunner-dev

2009-06-25 Thread Sivakrishna
Running like below works without installing xulrunner-dev,
MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME= eclipse


Bug#507536: it does not work here either

2009-05-01 Thread Ana Guerrero

On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:32:44AM +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote:
 
  Please try openjdk instead of gcj, gcj has never been really reliable
  for eclipse afaict.
  The only reason it was pursued was because it has the right license.
  Now with openjdk, gcj should probably be deprecated (at least for eclipse).
 


I need to use gcj, if eclipse does not work with it, after the line
testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj...found
it should stop.

 Also, make sure you have installed xulrunner-dev or the equivalent.
 If that doesn't work either, then the problem is that unstable has a too new
 version of xulrunner for eclipse.


If i need to install xulrunner-dev then a depend is missing.

 Mozilla people tend to change the interfaces at will which tends to break
 eclipse a lot. The most current breakage (also reported as a Fedora bug)
 is iirc still being discussed in upstream eclipse's bugzilla.

then this depende should be versioned :?






-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#507536: it does not work here either

2009-05-01 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:32:44AM +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote:
 
  Please try openjdk instead of gcj, gcj has never been really reliable
  for eclipse afaict.
  The only reason it was pursued was because it has the right license.
  Now with openjdk, gcj should probably be deprecated (at least for eclipse).
 
 
 Also, make sure you have installed xulrunner-dev or the equivalent.
 If that doesn't work either, then the problem is that unstable has a too new
 version of xulrunner for eclipse.
 
 Mozilla people tend to change the interfaces at will which tends to break
 eclipse a lot. The most current breakage (also reported as a Fedora bug)
 is iirc still being discussed in upstream eclipse's bugzilla.

BTW, thanks for the quick help. 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#507536: it does not work here either

2009-05-01 Thread Pantelis Koukousoulas
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org wrote:

 On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:32:44AM +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote:
 
  Please try openjdk instead of gcj, gcj has never been really reliable
  for eclipse afaict.
  The only reason it was pursued was because it has the right license.
  Now with openjdk, gcj should probably be deprecated (at least for eclipse).
 


 I need to use gcj, if eclipse does not work with it, after the line
 testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj...found
 it should stop.

 Also, make sure you have installed xulrunner-dev or the equivalent.
 If that doesn't work either, then the problem is that unstable has a too new
 version of xulrunner for eclipse.


 If i need to install xulrunner-dev then a depend is missing.

 Mozilla people tend to change the interfaces at will which tends to break
 eclipse a lot. The most current breakage (also reported as a Fedora bug)
 is iirc still being discussed in upstream eclipse's bugzilla.

 then this depende should be versioned :?


Agreed with all the above, but eclipse seems to have no active
maintainer right now
and the version in debian is trully ancient (the equivalent of kde 2.x).

The best solution at this time is probably to remove eclipse
altogether from debian
until someone with the needed time and dedication can pick it up and bring in
the current versions.

Until then we 'd just be beating a dead horse, imho.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#507536: it does not work here either

2009-04-30 Thread Ana Guerrero
severity 507536 serious
thanks


pure unstable/amd64 system here. I just installed eclipse to test something and 
I
got this problem too.

When starting eclipse from command line i got:

a...@pryan:$ eclipse
searching for compatible vm...
  testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk...not found
  testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj...found
***Here it stops and i get a popup message: This Eclipse build doesn't have
support for the integrated browser. I accept and it continues ...
Could not create /usr/local/lib/eclipse/.eclipseextension. Please run as root:
touch /usr/local/lib/eclipse/.eclipseextension
chmod 2775 /usr/local/lib/eclipse/.eclipseextension
chown root:staff /usr/local/lib/eclipse/.eclipseextension
/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java: symbol lookup error:
/home/ana/.eclipse/org.eclipse.platform_3.2.0/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/bundles/46/1/.cp/libswt-mozilla-gtk-3236.so:
undefined symbol: _ZN4nsID5ParseEPKc


It it the first time I install eclipse (never used it before, really).

Ana




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#507536: it does not work here either

2009-04-30 Thread Pantelis Koukousoulas
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org wrote:
 severity 507536 serious
 thanks


 pure unstable/amd64 system here. I just installed eclipse to test something 
 and I
 got this problem too.

 When starting eclipse from command line i got:

 a...@pryan:$ eclipse
 searching for compatible vm...
  testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk...not found
  testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj...found
 ***Here it stops and i get a popup message: This Eclipse build doesn't have
 support for the integrated browser. I accept and it continues ...
 Could not create /usr/local/lib/eclipse/.eclipseextension. Please run as root:
    touch /usr/local/lib/eclipse/.eclipseextension
    chmod 2775 /usr/local/lib/eclipse/.eclipseextension
    chown root:staff /usr/local/lib/eclipse/.eclipseextension
 /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java: symbol lookup error:
 /home/ana/.eclipse/org.eclipse.platform_3.2.0/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/bundles/46/1/.cp/libswt-mozilla-gtk-3236.so:
 undefined symbol: _ZN4nsID5ParseEPKc


 It it the first time I install eclipse (never used it before, really).

Please try openjdk instead of gcj, gcj has never been really reliable
for eclipse afaict.
The only reason it was pursued was because it has the right license.
Now with openjdk, gcj should probably be deprecated (at least for eclipse).



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#507536: it does not work here either

2009-04-30 Thread Pantelis Koukousoulas

 Please try openjdk instead of gcj, gcj has never been really reliable
 for eclipse afaict.
 The only reason it was pursued was because it has the right license.
 Now with openjdk, gcj should probably be deprecated (at least for eclipse).


Also, make sure you have installed xulrunner-dev or the equivalent.
If that doesn't work either, then the problem is that unstable has a too new
version of xulrunner for eclipse.

Mozilla people tend to change the interfaces at will which tends to break
eclipse a lot. The most current breakage (also reported as a Fedora bug)
is iirc still being discussed in upstream eclipse's bugzilla.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#507536:

2009-02-18 Thread Joonas Lehtinen
 Can you reproduce the bug on a clean Debian installation? If not -  
please downgrade the severity to a sane value.
I can confirm that this bug is reproducible in clean Debian 5.0. For  
details, see http://www.jole.fi/blog/2009/02/18/Java-finally-lands-on-Debian-almost-the-way-it-should.html

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Bug#507536: Missing dependency

2009-02-09 Thread Aurélien GÉRÔME
severity 507536 important
tags 507536 unreproducible
thanks

On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 11:54:35AM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
 Can you reproduce the bug on a clean Debian installation? If not -
 please downgrade the severity to a sane value.

Alright, it is not reproducible in a clean lenny chroot and it works
without the missing dependency.

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.   Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :'  :
`. `'`   Debian Developer
  `- Unix Sys  Net Admin


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#507536: Missing dependency

2009-02-08 Thread Aurélien GÉRÔME
severity 507536 serious
thanks

On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 05:44:42PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
 I am not convinced that this is a bug in the Debian package. Please
 read Bug #507536 and explain why do you think it is a bug in Debian.

Your package is unusable due to a missing dependency.
This is a RC bug which you can easily fix.

Please explain why you do not want to fix it.

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.   Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :'  :
`. `'`   Debian Developer
  `- Unix Sys  Net Admin


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#507536: Missing dependency

2009-02-05 Thread Aurélien GÉRÔME
severity 507536 serious
thanks

Hi,

The startup crashes either with gcj or with openjdk, due to a missing
dependency on xulrunner-dev. As the package is unusable without it,
this warrants a RC bug.

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.   Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :'  :
`. `'`   Debian Developer
  `- Unix Sys  Net Admin


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#507536: eclipse: undefined symbol: _ZN4nsID5ParseEPKc

2008-12-12 Thread Lars Kotthoff
 installing xulrunner-dev seems to fix this.

I had the same problem and installing xulrunner-dev also fixed it for me.

Lars



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#507536: libxul-dev did it for me ...

2008-12-12 Thread Eric Hanchrow
... on Ubuntu Intrepid.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#507536: eclipse: undefined symbol: _ZN4nsID5ParseEPKc

2008-12-07 Thread Martin Hecker
installing xulrunner-dev seems to fix this.






-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#507536: eclipse: undefined symbol: _ZN4nsID5ParseEPKc

2008-12-02 Thread Vincent Smeets
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.2.2-6.1
Severity: normal

Eclipse isn't starting!

I completly remove the directories ~/.eclipse and ~/workspace then I
start eclipse. Eclipse shows an error message and stops.

(I am running Debian from within a VirtualBox on a WinXP System)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ eclipse
searching for compatible vm...
  testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk...found
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/bin/java: symbol lookup error:
/home/s230984/.eclipse/org.eclipse.platform_3.2.0/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/bundles/81/1/.cp/libswt-mozilla-gtk-3236.so:
undefined symbol: _ZN4nsID5ParseEPKc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$

Regards,
Vincent Smeets


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages eclipse depends on:
ii  eclipse-jdt   3.2.2-6.1  Java Development Tools plug-ins fo
ii  eclipse-pde   3.2.2-6.1  Plug-in Development Environment to
ii  eclipse-source3.2.2-6.1  Eclipse source code plug-ins
ii  libc6 2.7-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.16.6-1   The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.12.11-4  The GTK+ graphical user interface
ii  zenity2.22.1-2   Display graphical dialog boxes fro

Versions of packages eclipse recommends:
ii  eclipse-gcj   3.2.2-6.1  Native Eclipse run with GCJ

eclipse suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]