Bug#510580: to mention ITP #478741
> Rake 0.8.3 is in Debian now. I have Rails 2.2.2 mostly done. I guess > 2.3.0 will be in experimental soon too so people can play with it. > - Adam Would be very good if we can see it soon :) i18n feature of rails 2.2 is very important for form validation l10n. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#510580: to mention ITP #478741
Jérémy Lal wrote: > After a quick test, i can tell that latest redmine (#2479) from svn is > not working with rails 2.3.0, > but it works with rails 2.2.2. > i have those gems installed : > > *** LOCAL GEMS *** > > actionmailer (2.2.2) > actionpack (2.2.2) > activerecord (2.2.2) > activeresource (2.2.2) > activesupport (2.2.2) > rails (2.2.2) > rake (0.8.3) > > note that rails 2.2.2 depends on rake >= 0.8.3 so the rake debian > package 0.8.1-3 is not enough. Rake 0.8.3 is in Debian now. I have Rails 2.2.2 mostly done. I guess 2.3.0 will be in experimental soon too so people can play with it. - Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#510580: to mention ITP #478741
After a quick test, i can tell that latest redmine (#2479) from svn is not working with rails 2.3.0, but it works with rails 2.2.2. i have those gems installed : *** LOCAL GEMS *** actionmailer (2.2.2) actionpack (2.2.2) activerecord (2.2.2) activeresource (2.2.2) activesupport (2.2.2) rails (2.2.2) rake (0.8.3) note that rails 2.2.2 depends on rake >= 0.8.3 so the rake debian package 0.8.1-3 is not enough. On 18.02.2009 05:44, Adam Majer wrote: Jérémy Lal wrote: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=478741 would be glad to see rails>= 2.1.2 coming... just a gentle reminder :) Ok. I'll try to get version 2.3.0 uploaded this weekend. Will that work for redmine? - Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#510580: to mention ITP #478741
Jérémy Lal wrote: On 18.02.2009 05:44, Adam Majer wrote: Jérémy Lal wrote: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=478741 would be glad to see rails>= 2.1.2 coming... just a gentle reminder :) Ok. I'll try to get version 2.3.0 uploaded this weekend. Will that work for redmine? actually redmine 0.8.1 (production release) works with rails 2.1.2 (the only completed milestone listed on http://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994-ruby-on-rails/milestones) and redmine 0.9 is supposed to work with rails 2.2. I'm going to test it with 2.3. maybe 2.3 is a bit in advance ? - Adam I would agree that 2.3 is a bit too new right now and we must hae 2.1.2 (for Redmine at least), but I would like to see 2.2 in the not too distant future. 2.2 includes quite a few goodies that are too good to pass up, including: * Ruby 1.9.x compatibility * Internationalization built-in * ETag support * Thread safety * ActiveRecord connection pooling, dynamic finders, better migrations, etc. * Plus a whole lot of other little goodies (memoization, shallow routes, etc.) Thanx! -- Richard Hurt KangarooBox, LLC. e: rnh...@kangaroobox.com p: 502-298-5422 Direct w: http://KangarooBox.com --
Bug#510580: to mention ITP #478741
On 18.02.2009 05:44, Adam Majer wrote: Jérémy Lal wrote: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=478741 would be glad to see rails>= 2.1.2 coming... just a gentle reminder :) Ok. I'll try to get version 2.3.0 uploaded this weekend. Will that work for redmine? actually redmine 0.8.1 (production release) works with rails 2.1.2 (the only completed milestone listed on http://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994-ruby-on-rails/milestones) and redmine 0.9 is supposed to work with rails 2.2. I'm going to test it with 2.3. maybe 2.3 is a bit in advance ? - Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#510580: to mention ITP #478741
Jérémy Lal wrote: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=478741 > > would be glad to see rails >= 2.1.2 coming... just a gentle reminder :) Ok. I'll try to get version 2.3.0 uploaded this weekend. Will that work for redmine? - Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#510580: to mention ITP #478741
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=478741 would be glad to see rails >= 2.1.2 coming... just a gentle reminder :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
