Bug#510914: ruby1.9: should maybe build-dep on procps

2009-01-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum 
On 05/01/09 at 15:01 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> Package: ruby1.9
> Version: 1.9.0.2-9
> Severity: normal
> 
> I noticed the hppa buildd log has a lot of these messages:
>  /bin/sh: line 2: ps: command not found
> 
> Should ruby1.9 build-dep on procps?

It should, yes. I added that hack to monitor the build process on slow
arches (where compiling the parser with -O3 could take hours).

However, that problem is harmless: it doesn't cause any change in the
build result.
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#510914: ruby1.9: should maybe build-dep on procps

2009-01-05 Thread dann frazier 
Package: ruby1.9
Version: 1.9.0.2-9
Severity: normal

I noticed the hppa buildd log has a lot of these messages:
 /bin/sh: line 2: ps: command not found

Should ruby1.9 build-dep on procps?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: ia64

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-mckinley (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages ruby1.9 depends on:
ii  libc6.1   2.7-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libruby1.91.9.0.2-9  Libraries necessary to run Ruby 1.

ruby1.9 recommends no packages.

Versions of packages ruby1.9 suggests:
pn  rdoc1.9(no description available)
pn  ri1.9  (no description available)
pn  ruby1.9-examples   (no description available)
pn  rubygems1.9(no description available)

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org