Bug#511456: time: defaults to POSIX non-compliance

2011-02-12 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Bart Massey wrote:

 Thanks! I agree that this is much better.

Forwarded to bug-gnu-utils.  Hopefully someone there will take
pity on us and become GNU time maintainer. :)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#511456: time: defaults to POSIX non-compliance

2011-02-08 Thread Bart Massey
Thanks! I agree that this is much better. Only thing better yet would
be to fix the POSIX standard to require that format by default, and I
can't see that happening anytime soon. :-)

Thanks much for working on this.

Bart

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
 tags 511456 - moreinfo
 retitle 511456 time: documentation of -p is unclear
 severity 511456 minor
 tags 511456 + upstream
 quit

 Bart Massey wrote:

 Sorry, I hadn' t realized the POSIX standard was so broken that it
 required a flag to get a guarantee of predictable formatting. I guess
 under those circumstances I'll just have to get used to writing time
 -p and hoping that everyone's time implementation is
 POSIX-compliant.

 Ok, cc-ing the bug log.  Now that I check the manpage and info
 documentation, I can agree that it is downright misleading:

        -p, --portability
                Use the following format string, for conformance with
                POSIX standard 1003.2:

                        real %e
                        user %U
                        sys %S

 It would be better to say:

        -p, --portability
                Use the following format string:

                        real %e
                        user %U
                        sys %S

                The default output format of time differs widely
                between implementations.  This option (in its
                short form -p) is supported by all POSIX-compliant
                'time' implementations to retrieve basic
                information in the described format.

 Roughly like this, maybe.
 ---
 diff --git a/time.texi b/time.texi
 index c725f8a..8da3727 100644
 --- a/time.texi
 +++ b/time.texi
 @@ -182,8 +182,7 @@ Use @var{format} as the format string.

  @item -p
  @itemx --portability
 -Use the following format string, for conformance with POSIX standard
 -1003.2:
 +Use the following format string:

  @example
  real %e
 @@ -191,6 +190,11 @@ user %U
  sys %S
  @end example

 +The default output format of time differs widely between
 +implementations.  This option (in its short form -p) is supported by all
 +POSIX-compliant 'time' implementations to retrieve basic information in
 +the described format.
 +
  @item -q
  @itemx --quiet
  Suppress non-zero error code from the executed program.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#511456: time: defaults to POSIX non-compliance

2011-02-07 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Bart,

Two years ago, you wrote[1]:

 GNU time has a --portability flag to get the
 POSIX-mandated formatting of its output.  The BASH time
 builtin is used in /bin/sh invocations and is
 POSIX-compliant.  The combination of these features means
 that it is difficult to write portable shell scripts that
 examine the output of time but work under Debian.  A
 workaround is
[...]

I responded by mentioning that the output format is not
mandated by POSIX but with the -p option[2] it is.

Does that address your concern?  Perhaps some documentation
was confusing and should be clarified?

Thanks for your work to improve Debian,
Jonathan

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/511456
[2] 
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/time.html#tag_20_129_04



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#511456: time: defaults to POSIX non-compliance

2011-02-07 Thread Jonathan Nieder
tags 511456 - moreinfo
retitle 511456 time: documentation of -p is unclear
severity 511456 minor
tags 511456 + upstream
quit

Bart Massey wrote:

 Sorry, I hadn' t realized the POSIX standard was so broken that it
 required a flag to get a guarantee of predictable formatting. I guess
 under those circumstances I'll just have to get used to writing time
 -p and hoping that everyone's time implementation is
 POSIX-compliant.

Ok, cc-ing the bug log.  Now that I check the manpage and info
documentation, I can agree that it is downright misleading:

-p, --portability
Use the following format string, for conformance with
POSIX standard 1003.2:

real %e
user %U
sys %S

It would be better to say:

-p, --portability
Use the following format string:

real %e
user %U
sys %S

The default output format of time differs widely
between implementations.  This option (in its
short form -p) is supported by all POSIX-compliant
'time' implementations to retrieve basic
information in the described format.

Roughly like this, maybe.
---
diff --git a/time.texi b/time.texi
index c725f8a..8da3727 100644
--- a/time.texi
+++ b/time.texi
@@ -182,8 +182,7 @@ Use @var{format} as the format string.
 
 @item -p
 @itemx --portability
-Use the following format string, for conformance with POSIX standard
-1003.2:
+Use the following format string:
 
 @example
 real %e
@@ -191,6 +190,11 @@ user %U
 sys %S
 @end example
 
+The default output format of time differs widely between
+implementations.  This option (in its short form -p) is supported by all
+POSIX-compliant 'time' implementations to retrieve basic information in
+the described format.
+
 @item -q
 @itemx --quiet
 Suppress non-zero error code from the executed program.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#511456: time: defaults to POSIX non-compliance

2010-11-02 Thread Jonathan Nieder
severity 511456 wishlist
tags 511456 + moreinfo
quit

Hi Bart,

Sorry for the long silence.

Bart Massey wrote:

 GNU time has a --portability flag to get the
 POSIX-mandated formatting of its output.  The BASH time
 builtin is used in /bin/sh invocations and is
 POSIX-compliant.  The combination of these features means
 that it is difficult to write portable shell scripts that
 examine the output of time but work under Debian.

Why can't you use time -p unconditionally?

POSIX has this to say[1]:

-p
Write the timing output to standard error in the
format shown in the STDERR section.

so I think it should be reliable.

[1] 
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/time.html#tag_20_129_04



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#511456: time: defaults to POSIX non-compliance

2009-01-10 Thread Bart Massey
Package: time
Version: 1.7-23
Severity: normal


GNU time has a --portability flag to get the
POSIX-mandated formatting of its output.  The BASH time
builtin is used in /bin/sh invocations and is
POSIX-compliant.  The combination of these features means
that it is difficult to write portable shell scripts that
examine the output of time but work under Debian.  A
workaround is to set the TIME environment variable to the
POSIX format, but since other programs may use an
environment variable named something as generic as TIME in
other ways, one must be fairly selective about it; in any
case, it's a gratuitous painful wart.

The default behavior of time should be POSIX-compliant.  A
flag and/or environment variable could instead give the
current non-standard behavior.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (150, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages time depends on:
ii  libc6 2.7-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries

time recommends no packages.

time suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org