Bug#514125: gdebi package updates (Debian stuff)

2009-10-02 Thread Michael Vogt
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:11:20AM -0700, Gustavo Franco wrote:
 If Michael is fine with that, I say go for it. I'll busy moving for
 the third time in a year real soon now.

I'm fine with it too, I'm very attached to gdebi, I like it a lot. But
I find less and less time to maintian it properly, so anything that
helps is ok with me :)

Cheers,
 Michael
 
 On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org wrote:
  Hi all!
 
  I have some spare time to eventually invest in (co)maintaining or
  sponsoring gdebi.
 
  Michael, Gustavo, if you haven't much time to spend on gdebi, what do
  you think to move to team maintenance (collab-maint, PAPT, whatever), so
  it can receive additional love? Rafael, would you be interested in
  (co)maintain it together with me or some other developers/contributors?
 
  Please let me know! TIA :)
 
  --
 
   .''`.
   : :' :   Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org
   `. `'
    `-
 
 
 
 regards,
 -- Gustavo stratus Franco



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#514125: gdebi package updates (Debian stuff)

2009-09-28 Thread Luca Falavigna
Hi all!

I have some spare time to eventually invest in (co)maintaining or
sponsoring gdebi.

Michael, Gustavo, if you haven't much time to spend on gdebi, what do
you think to move to team maintenance (collab-maint, PAPT, whatever), so
it can receive additional love? Rafael, would you be interested in
(co)maintain it together with me or some other developers/contributors?

Please let me know! TIA :)

-- 

  .''`.
 : :' :   Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org
 `. `'
   `-



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#514125: gdebi package updates (Debian stuff)

2009-09-28 Thread Gustavo Franco
If Michael is fine with that, I say go for it. I'll busy moving for
the third time in a year real soon now.

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org wrote:
 Hi all!

 I have some spare time to eventually invest in (co)maintaining or
 sponsoring gdebi.

 Michael, Gustavo, if you haven't much time to spend on gdebi, what do
 you think to move to team maintenance (collab-maint, PAPT, whatever), so
 it can receive additional love? Rafael, would you be interested in
 (co)maintain it together with me or some other developers/contributors?

 Please let me know! TIA :)

 --

  .''`.
  : :' :   Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org
  `. `'
   `-



regards,
-- Gustavo stratus Franco



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#514125: gdebi package updates (Debian stuff)

2009-05-20 Thread Rafael Belmonte
Hello Gustavo and Michael, I hope for you read this message.
Gdebi package in Debian archive is too old yet, an update is needed.
Current gdebi version in unstable is 0.3.11 when the latest upstream is
0.4.9. Unfortunately version 0.4.9 depends on python 2.6 which is not still
in unstable, so we only can package it for experimental, or force it to use
python 2.5 (I think this is not a good idea).
But there are a version of gdebi that works pretty well in Debian
testing/unstable now, it is 0.4.0 version. The current gdebi version in
Debian 0.3.11 does not provide KDE frontend becouse it was problematic in
Debian lenny with KDE 3.5, now KDE 4.2 is in testing and unstable and
version 0.4.0 of gdebi provides a KDE4 frontend that is working now in
Debian. So we could update gdebi to its 0.4.0 version until python 2.6 reach
unstable, I have packages (binary and source) in my Launchpad PPA, so I can
colaborate with you in this task.
I will be waiting for your reply.

Cheers.


Bug#514125: gdebi package updates (Debian stuff)

2009-05-20 Thread Gustavo Franco
Hi Rafael,

Thanks for mailing us. I'm all for you uploading 0.4.0 in the
meantime, yes. I'm sorry I will have no free time to promptly review
it soon--just moved to United States, lots of real life issues to
solve first. If Michael or any other DD can review it and upload, I'm
more than ok with your NMU (non-maintainer upload).

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Rafael Belmonte eaglescr...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello Gustavo and Michael, I hope for you read this message.
 Gdebi package in Debian archive is too old yet, an update is needed.
 Current gdebi version in unstable is 0.3.11 when the latest upstream is
 0.4.9. Unfortunately version 0.4.9 depends on python 2.6 which is not still
 in unstable, so we only can package it for experimental, or force it to use
 python 2.5 (I think this is not a good idea).
 But there are a version of gdebi that works pretty well in Debian
 testing/unstable now, it is 0.4.0 version. The current gdebi version in
 Debian 0.3.11 does not provide KDE frontend becouse it was problematic in
 Debian lenny with KDE 3.5, now KDE 4.2 is in testing and unstable and
 version 0.4.0 of gdebi provides a KDE4 frontend that is working now in
 Debian. So we could update gdebi to its 0.4.0 version until python 2.6 reach
 unstable, I have packages (binary and source) in my Launchpad PPA, so I can
 colaborate with you in this task.
 I will be waiting for your reply.

 Cheers.


regards,
-- Gustavo stratus Franco



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#514125: gdebi package updates (Debian stuff)

2009-05-20 Thread Michael Vogt
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 09:13:05PM +0200, Rafael Belmonte wrote:
 Hello Gustavo and Michael, I hope for you read this message.
Hi,

Thanks for your mail!

 Gdebi package in Debian archive is too old yet, an update is needed.
 Current gdebi version in unstable is 0.3.11 when the latest upstream is
 0.4.9. Unfortunately version 0.4.9 depends on python 2.6 which is not still
 in unstable, so we only can package it for experimental, or force it to use
 python 2.5 (I think this is not a good idea).

I think it should work just fine on python2.5. The only problem is
probably the --install-layout=deb flag that got added for the ubuntu
python2.6 changes. If that is removed, it should work fine with 2.5,
I'm not aware of any 2.6 features that it uses.

 But there are a version of gdebi that works pretty well in Debian
 testing/unstable now, it is 0.4.0 version. The current gdebi version in
 Debian 0.3.11 does not provide KDE frontend becouse it was problematic in
 Debian lenny with KDE 3.5, now KDE 4.2 is in testing and unstable and
 version 0.4.0 of gdebi provides a KDE4 frontend that is working now in
 Debian. So we could update gdebi to its 0.4.0 version until python 2.6 reach
 unstable, I have packages (binary and source) in my Launchpad PPA, so I can
 colaborate with you in this task.

I'm happy that you want to work on this. Ideally the versions in
debian and ubuntu should be the same and ubuntu would just sync from
debian. Currently this is not the case because of the
--install-layout=yes difference in debian/rules. 

Cheers,
 Michael



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#514125: gdebi package updates (Debian stuff)

2009-05-20 Thread Rafael Belmonte
Hello, I have uploaded a package of 0.4.0 version by the moment to
debian-mentors, I have received the confirmation of the upload:

Your upload of the package 'gdebi' to mentors.debian.net was
successful. Sponsors can now download it. The URL of your package is:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gdebi

The respective dsc file can be found at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gdebi/gdebi_0.4.0debian1+nmu1.dsc

-

You can check it and if you consider, upload it to Debian archive, It builds
on an pbuilder fake unstable enviroment.
Packaging 0.4.9 version require several tests by the mentioned issues.