Bug#514765: debian-maintainers: Please provide reportbug templates so that this DM applications bug reports are "templated"

2010-07-22 Thread Olivier Berger
Enrico Zini  writes:

> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 06:52:18PM +0100, Olivier Berger wrote:
>
>> reportbug allows the preparation of bug reports with the help of a
>> templating system (for instance see reports made for wnpp). This would
>> help to have similar setup for DM applications, I suppose.
>
> I'd love that. Now that jetring is not needed, a template would still be
> very useful to have machine-parsable reports.
>
> Do you have details/pointers on how to write such a template?
>

I must say I have forgotten the details on the rationale
here... sorry. It was probably obvious when I applied as a DM, but can't
recall :-/

But good luck anyway ;)

Ciao and best regards,
-- 
Olivier BERGER 
(OpenPGP: 1024D/B4C5F37F)
http://www.olivierberger.com/weblog/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#514765: debian-maintainers: Please provide reportbug templates so that this DM applications bug reports are "templated"

2010-07-22 Thread Xavier Oswald
On 14:18 Thu 22 Jul , Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 06:52:18PM +0100, Olivier Berger wrote:
> 
> > reportbug allows the preparation of bug reports with the help of a
> > templating system (for instance see reports made for wnpp). This would
> > help to have similar setup for DM applications, I suppose.


> I'd love that. Now that jetring is not needed, a template would still be
> very useful to have machine-parsable reports.
> 
> Do you have details/pointers on how to write such a template?
> 
> I also had in mind to create a little web interface to submit requests,
> since I already have code for automatic signature verification on
> advocacy mails given their URL. Maybe the web interface is still better
> as it can provide immediate feedback.
> 
> I'd like to evaluate all options, though.

+1

I think having both, web interface and reportbug templates could be nice.

But I think if we move the things, we should take care of doing this in a 
generic
way. Im thinking here of NM and DM, we could process NM and DM application via
reportbug and take care of extending this if we set in the future other
status like Doc writer, graphists or such. As it is done for WNPP with some
options...

Greetings,
-- 
Xavier Oswald 
GNU/Linux Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org/
GPG key IDs: 0x88BBB51E, 0x464B8DE3


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#514765: debian-maintainers: Please provide reportbug templates so that this DM applications bug reports are "templated"

2010-07-22 Thread Enrico Zini
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 06:52:18PM +0100, Olivier Berger wrote:

> reportbug allows the preparation of bug reports with the help of a
> templating system (for instance see reports made for wnpp). This would
> help to have similar setup for DM applications, I suppose.

I'd love that. Now that jetring is not needed, a template would still be
very useful to have machine-parsable reports.

Do you have details/pointers on how to write such a template?

I also had in mind to create a little web interface to submit requests,
since I already have code for automatic signature verification on
advocacy mails given their URL. Maybe the web interface is still better
as it can provide immediate feedback.

I'd like to evaluate all options, though.


Ciao,

Enrico

-- 
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#514765: debian-maintainers: Please provide reportbug templates so that this DM applications bug reports are "templated"

2009-02-10 Thread Olivier Berger
Package: debian-maintainers
Version: 1.52
Severity: wishlist

Hi.

reportbug allows the preparation of bug reports with the help of a templating 
system (for instance see reports made for wnpp). This would help to have 
similar setup for DM applications, I suppose.

Best regards,


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

debian-maintainers depends on no packages.

Versions of packages debian-maintainers recommends:
ii  gnupg 1.4.9-3GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep

debian-maintainers suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org