Bug#516555: CVE-2008-6059: missing access restriction

2009-04-26 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:38:12AM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
 does this problem (with cookies) really affect the version of webkit in
 debian, which does not currently support cookies (or more accurately
 the libraries in debian are not current enough to support cookies in
 webkit)?  

Gustavo, Mike,
can you confirm that Webkit from Lenny isn't affected by this problem?

Cheers,
Moritz 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#516555: CVE-2008-6059: missing access restriction

2009-04-26 Thread Michael S. Gilbert
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:17:22 +0200 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:

 On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:38:12AM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
  does this problem (with cookies) really affect the version of webkit in
  debian, which does not currently support cookies (or more accurately
  the libraries in debian are not current enough to support cookies in
  webkit)?  
 
 Gustavo, Mike,
 can you confirm that Webkit from Lenny isn't affected by this problem?

webkit 1.0.1-4 in lenny passes their regression test for this particular
issue.  after reviewing the code [1], the patches primarily appear to
fix the mac- and windows-specific cookie handling code and just clean
up the libsoup-related code. the linux-specific code relies on lipsoup
for cookies, and since webkit 1.0.1-4 does not depend on libsoup, i
would say that lenny is safe; unless webkit is falling back on one of
the other cookie handlers.

going forward, someone needs to check whether libsoup is vulnerable or
not.

i have submitted some questions upstream [2] to get their opinion.

[1] http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/38566
[2] https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10957



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#516555: CVE-2008-6059: missing access restriction

2009-02-24 Thread Michael Gilbert
does this problem (with cookies) really affect the version of webkit in
debian, which does not currently support cookies (or more accurately
the libraries in debian are not current enough to support cookies in
webkit)?  



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#516555: CVE-2008-6059: missing access restriction

2009-02-22 Thread Steffen Joeris
Package: webkit
Severity: important
Tags: security

Hi Mike,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities  Exposures) id was
published for webkit.

CVE-2008-6059[0]:
| xml/XMLHttpRequest.cpp in WebCore in WebKit before r38566 does not
| properly restrict access from web pages to the (1) Set-Cookie and (2)
| Set-Cookie2 HTTP response headers, which allows remote attackers to
| obtain sensitive information from cookies via XMLHttpRequest calls,
| related to the HTTPOnly protection mechanism.

I am not quite sure that I understood the issue correctly, so I used
important as the severity. Maybe you could investigate the severity and
state your opinion?

If you fix the vulnerability please also make sure to include the
CVE id in your changelog entry.

Cheers
Steffen

For further information see:

[0] http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-6059
http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2008-6059



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org