Bug#522970: hex-a-hop: More undo steps needed
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 08:40:17PM +0400, Tenno Seremel wrote: That was the intended behaviour. In case you want to fix it by yourself, change MAX_UNDO in hex_puzzzle.cpp and rebuild the package. How about a command-line option? I doubt that I would recompile hex-a-hop every time it will update (if that happens), but thanks anyway. Also, Debian doesn't need to agree when an author intends something. Especially in case of hex-a-hop, where upstream is dead/taken over by us, it is a good idea to rethink such policy decisions. As far as I'm concerned, we should remove the limit completely. I don't see a reason for limiting undo steps at all. Thanks, Bas -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://a82-93-13-222.adsl.xs4all.nl/e-mail.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#522970: hex-a-hop: More undo steps needed
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:41:30AM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote: As far as I'm concerned, we should remove the limit completely. I don't see a reason for limiting undo steps at all. It forces the player to carefully think before each step. Otherwise it's just a game and not a mathematical miracle (I currently have a very funny mathematical puzzle which is very interesting: See e.g. http://www.skats.de/raetselecke/19592-zahlenraetsel, very funny, I would never like to miss such fun even in games). Jens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#522970: hex-a-hop: More undo steps needed
It's not really useful for something other than undoing wrong clicks. That was the intended behaviour. In case you want to fix it by yourself, change MAX_UNDO in hex_puzzzle.cpp and rebuild the package. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#522970: hex-a-hop: More undo steps needed
That was the intended behaviour. In case you want to fix it by yourself, change MAX_UNDO in hex_puzzzle.cpp and rebuild the package. How about a command-line option? I doubt that I would recompile hex-a-hop every time it will update (if that happens), but thanks anyway. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#522970: hex-a-hop: More undo steps needed
Package: hex-a-hop Version: 0.0.20070315-6 Severity: wishlist Please add more than 6 (currently) undo steps. It's not really useful for something other than undoing wrong clicks. For example, if you solved about a half of the level and realized you made a mistake in the second half you need to restart level. For hard (or long) levels it's quite unnoying to repeat something you already solved and makes it's harder to test your thoughts of steps required. If possible make it at least 20 steps or even more right to the beginning since (I presume) it'll not require much memory - it's not that there are million tiles on one level. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages hex-a-hop depends on: ii libc62.9-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc1 1:4.3.3-3 GCC support library ii libsdl-pango10.1.2-4 text rendering with Pango in SDL a ii libsdl1.2debian 1.2.13-4+b1 Simple DirectMedia Layer ii libstdc++6 4.3.3-3 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 hex-a-hop recommends no packages. hex-a-hop suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org