Bug#524363: [Evolution] Bug#524363: evolution: Still there in 2.32
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 11:13:48AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: tags 524363 + patch thanks On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:33:45AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: FYI, the patch seems to be available in http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=187010 I've finally been able to rebuild e-d-s with the patch applied, and it seems this fixes the trash corruption/expunging issues I've been expriencing. I'd suggest to include it then. Hmmm... unfortunately, this hasn't solved all the problems it seems. I now experience again the impossibility to expunge some folder's deleted mails : (evolution:5041): camel-local-provider-WARNING **: Didn't get the next message where I expected (435128) got 442552 instead as soon as I Ctr-e inside a particular folder :-( Anyway, it wouldn't harm I guess. Best regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#524363: [Evolution] Bug#524363: evolution: Still there in 2.32
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 06:33:46PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: I now experience again the impossibility to expunge some folder's deleted mails : (evolution:5041): camel-local-provider-WARNING **: Didn't get the next message where I expected (435128) got 442552 instead as soon as I Ctr-e inside a particular folder :-( Anyway, it wouldn't harm I guess. FYI, I've checked and noticed some potential problems on many of my mbox files used for evolution storage. So, I've used formail -ds to repair them, after removing all index files, hoping it would improve the situation. Will see how it goes. My 2 cents, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#524363: [Evolution] Bug#524363: evolution: Still there in 2.32
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 07:33:11PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On dim., 2011-05-01 at 19:15 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: Last comment on the upstream bug is asking for users with test case for reproducing and testing a patch against 2.32. Would you be able to prepare a patched package for me to test ? I'm afraid I'm not so much available these days to dive into patching and rebuilding evolution :-/ Unless it's really easy... I must say I haven't looked at the package's sources. Please contact the upstream maintainer directly, I'm not too sure what he needs. If/when needed I should be able to provide a package, yes, for amd64 or i386. FYI, the patch seems to be available in http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=187010 Hope this helps. Best regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#524363: [Evolution] Bug#524363: evolution: Still there in 2.32
tags 524363 + patch thanks On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:33:45AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: FYI, the patch seems to be available in http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=187010 I've finally been able to rebuild e-d-s with the patch applied, and it seems this fixes the trash corruption/expunging issues I've been expriencing. I'd suggest to include it then. Best regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#524363: evolution: Still there in 2.32
Package: evolution Version: 2.32.2-2 Severity: normal Hi. FYI (and as already known from watching the upstream bug), the same symptoms still occur with 2.32 : (evolution:1349): camel-WARNING **: Error message was: Error storing '~/.local/share/evolution/mail/local/Inbox (mbox)': Summary and folder mismatch, even after a sync Reopening, then. Best regards, -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages evolution depends on: ii dbus 1.4.6-1 simple interprocess messaging syst ii debconf [debconf 1.5.38 Debian configuration management sy ii evolution-common 2.32.2-2architecture independent files for ii evolution-data-s 2.32.2-4evolution database backend server ii gconf2 2.28.1-6GNOME configuration database syste ii gnome-icon-theme 2.30.3-2GNOME Desktop icon theme ii libatk1.0-0 2.0.0-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc62.11.2-11 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libcairo21.10.2-6The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libcamel1.2-19 2.32.2-4The Evolution MIME message handlin ii libcanberra-gtk0 0.24-1 Gtk+ helper for playing widget eve ii libcanberra0 0.24-1 a simple abstract interface for pl ii libdbus-1-3 1.4.6-1 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libdbus-glib-1-2 0.92-1 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libebackend1.2-0 2.32.2-4Utility library for evolution data ii libebook1.2-10 2.32.2-4Client library for evolution addre ii libecal1.2-8 2.32.2-4Client library for evolution calen ii libedataserver1. 2.32.2-4Utility library for evolution data ii libedataserverui 2.32.2-4GUI utility library for evolution ii libegroupwise1.2 2.32.2-4Client library for accessing group ii libenchant1c2a 1.6.0-2 a wrapper library for various spel ii libevolution 2.32.2-2evolution libraries ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-2.2 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.4.4-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgail182.24.4-3GNOME Accessibility Implementation ii libgconf2-4 2.28.1-6GNOME configuration database syste ii libgdata70.6.4-3 Library for accessing GData webser ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0 2.23.3-3GDK Pixbuf library ii libglib2.0-0 2.28.6-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome-desktop 2.30.2-2Utility library for loading .deskt ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.4-3The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgtkhtml-edito 3.32.2-2HTML rendering/editing library - e ii libgtkhtml3.14-1 3.32.2-2HTML rendering/editing library - r ii libgweather1 2.30.3-1GWeather shared library ii libical0 0.44-3 iCalendar library implementation i ii libice6 2:1.0.7-1 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libnotify1 [libn 0.5.0-2 sends desktop notifications to a n ii libnspr4-0d 4.8.7-2 NetScape Portable Runtime Library ii libnss3-1d 3.12.9.with.ckbi.1.82-1 Network Security Service libraries ii libpango1.0-01.28.3-6Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-0 1.2.44-2PNG library - runtime ii libsm6 2:1.2.0-1 X11 Session Management library ii libsoup2.4-1 2.34.0-1HTTP library implementation in C - ii libsqlite3-0 3.7.5-1 SQLite 3 shared library ii libstartup-notif 0.10-1 library for program launch feedbac ii libunique-1.0-0 1.1.6-2 Library for writing single instanc ii libxml2 2.7.8.dfsg-2+b1 GNOME XML library Versions of packages evolution recommends: ii bogofilter 1.2.2-3 fast Bayesian spam filter (dummy p ii evolution-plugins2.32.2-2standard plugins for Evolution ii evolution-webcal 2.32.0-1webcal: URL handler for GNOME and ii gnome-desktop-data 2.30.2-2Common files for GNOME desktop app ii spamassassin 3.3.1-2 Perl-based spam filter using text ii yelp 2.30.1+webkit-1 Help browser for GNOME Versions of packages evolution suggests: ii bug-buddy 2.30.0+dfsg-1+b2 GNOME Desktop Environment bug repo ii evolution-dbg
Bug#524363: [Evolution] Bug#524363: evolution: Still there in 2.32
On dim., 2011-05-01 at 16:05 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: Hi. FYI (and as already known from watching the upstream bug), the same symptoms still occur with 2.32 : (evolution:1349): camel-WARNING **: Error message was: Error storing '~/.local/share/evolution/mail/local/Inbox (mbox)': Summary and folder mismatch, even after a sync Reopening, then. Since you have a way to reproduce it, could you comment on the upstream bug? -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#524363: [Evolution] Bug#524363: evolution: Still there in 2.32
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 17:10 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On dim., 2011-05-01 at 16:05 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: Hi. FYI (and as already known from watching the upstream bug), the same symptoms still occur with 2.32 : (evolution:1349): camel-WARNING **: Error message was: Error storing '~/.local/share/evolution/mail/local/Inbox (mbox)': Summary and folder mismatch, even after a sync Reopening, then. Since you have a way to reproduce it, could you comment on the upstream bug? I could, but I doubt this would help more than current existing comments. And the mails DB is still the same as before, i.e. several hundreds of thousands of mails of mine, plus some vfolders. Thanks for caring. Best regards, -- Olivier BERGER olivier.ber...@it-sudparis.eu http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8 Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF Institut TELECOM, SudParis (http://www.it-sudparis.eu/), Evry (France) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#524363: [Evolution] Bug#524363: evolution: Still there in 2.32
On dim., 2011-05-01 at 19:06 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: Since you have a way to reproduce it, could you comment on the upstream bug? I could, but I doubt this would help more than current existing comments. And the mails DB is still the same as before, i.e. several hundreds of thousands of mails of mine, plus some vfolders. Last comment on the upstream bug is asking for users with test case for reproducing and testing a patch against 2.32. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#524363: [Evolution] Bug#524363: evolution: Still there in 2.32
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 19:08 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On dim., 2011-05-01 at 19:06 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: Since you have a way to reproduce it, could you comment on the upstream bug? I could, but I doubt this would help more than current existing comments. And the mails DB is still the same as before, i.e. several hundreds of thousands of mails of mine, plus some vfolders. Last comment on the upstream bug is asking for users with test case for reproducing and testing a patch against 2.32. Would you be able to prepare a patched package for me to test ? I'm afraid I'm not so much available these days to dive into patching and rebuilding evolution :-/ Unless it's really easy... I must say I haven't looked at the package's sources. Regards, -- Olivier BERGER olivier.ber...@it-sudparis.eu http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8 Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF Institut TELECOM, SudParis (http://www.it-sudparis.eu/), Evry (France) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#524363: [Evolution] Bug#524363: evolution: Still there in 2.32
On dim., 2011-05-01 at 19:15 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: Last comment on the upstream bug is asking for users with test case for reproducing and testing a patch against 2.32. Would you be able to prepare a patched package for me to test ? I'm afraid I'm not so much available these days to dive into patching and rebuilding evolution :-/ Unless it's really easy... I must say I haven't looked at the package's sources. Please contact the upstream maintainer directly, I'm not too sure what he needs. If/when needed I should be able to provide a package, yes, for amd64 or i386. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
