Bug#524511: cannot set tags on command line
I've asked bts owner to provide a list of canonical tags so we can sync reportbug with that. Once the list will be available, we'll add all the missing tags. The list of canonical tags can be found here: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags Cheers, Fabian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#524511: cannot set tags on command line
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:07, Fabian Greffrath greffr...@leat.rub.de wrote: I've asked bts owner to provide a list of canonical tags so we can sync reportbug with that. Once the list will be available, we'll add all the missing tags. The list of canonical tags can be found here: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags Yeah, thank you... Now, what I want is something like [1]: once it will be there, I'll work on this. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/pseudopackages/pseudo-packages.description -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#524511: cannot set tags on command line
Hi Martin, On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 07:17, martin f krafftmadd...@debian.org wrote: also sprach Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org [2009.06.06.0836 +0200]: The solution I'd like to pursuit is: provide the whole set of BTS tags This means that whenever a new tag is added, you have to upload a new reportbug, and that the information is redundantly stored also in devscript's bts. I wonder if it weren't better not to do any checks. Let's put it this way: - tags are an official part on BTS and are defined by BTS admin (usertags are a different categorization, out of this problem); - tags don't change that ofter (except for release specific tags, that are private for rel team to set, and almost never done at submit time), so we can update the list when changes are applied and wait for a new upload to happen without too much worry and hurry; - since we should guarantee that reportbug works even offline, we cannot download the list all the times, so having a little replication of data (with a script to check for update) seems to reduce the impact of the problem. Hope this clarify the situation, but your suggestions are always welcome :) Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#524511: cannot set tags on command line
also sprach Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org [2009.06.06.0836 +0200]: The solution I'd like to pursuit is: provide the whole set of BTS tags This means that whenever a new tag is added, you have to upload a new reportbug, and that the information is redundantly stored also in devscript's bts. I wonder if it weren't better not to do any checks. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems the early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese in the trap. digital_signature_gpg.asc Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
Bug#524511: cannot set tags on command line
Hi Martin, thanks for your report. On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 16:13, martin f krafft madd...@debian.org wrote: If I specify --tag=upstream or -T upstream on the command line, I am told: Ignored bogus setting for --tag: upstream it seems that reportbug only allows l10n and patch as tags, which are the two it offers interactively. Please allow any tag to be specified. The solution I'd like to pursuit is: provide the whole set of BTS tags (except those reserved to release team). I've asked bts owner to provide a list of canonical tags so we can sync reportbug with that. Once the list will be available, we'll add all the missing tags. Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#524511: cannot set tags on command line
Package: reportbug Version: 4.1 Severity: normal If I specify --tag=upstream or -T upstream on the command line, I am told: Ignored bogus setting for --tag: upstream it seems that reportbug only allows l10n and patch as tags, which are the two it offers interactively. Please allow any tag to be specified. -- Package-specific info: ** Environment settings: EDITOR=/usr/bin/vim VISUAL=/usr/bin/vim DEBEMAIL=madd...@debian.org DEBFULLNAME=martin f. krafft ** /home/madduck/.reportbugrc: mode expert ui text mutt query-bts check-available compress config-files verify no-cc -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages reportbug depends on: ii apt 0.7.20.2 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii python2.5.4-2An interactive high-level object-o ii python-reportbug 4.1Python modules for interacting wit reportbug recommends no packages. Versions of packages reportbug suggests: pn debconf-utils none (no description available) pn debsums none (no description available) pn dlocate none (no description available) ii file 5.00-1 Determines file type using magic ii gnupg 1.4.9-4GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep ii postfix [mail-transport-agent 2.5.5-1.1 High-performance mail transport ag ii python-gnome2-extras 2.25.3-2 Extra Python bindings for the GNOM ii python-gtk2 2.14.1-2 Python bindings for the GTK+ widge pn python-urwid none (no description available) pn python-vtenone (no description available) -- debconf-show failed -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems digital_signature_gpg.asc Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
