Bug#526546: FTBFS: #error unsupported architecture
severity 526546 important thanks On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:18:48AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: right, I missed that part. So this is indeed just important. Thanks! I will followup with upstream regarding more architecture supports, but in the meantime what's the reason not to have this in testing, for archs in which it works? Can't we leave it important for now? Just following upstream isn't enough - upstreams' don't neccesarily care about all the archs debian supports. For example the unshare syscall which is one of the reason's that could cause the error message, is supported on arm. Yes, that's why I wrote followup, not follow, as in I will actively talk with upstream to make this happen :) Thanks, Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#526546: FTBFS: #error unsupported architecture
severity 526546 serious thanks Quite rude to change the severity without notifying the reporter. At least the error message should tell what specific feature is missing from the arch rather than spew a generic unspported arch message. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#526546: FTBFS: #error unsupported architecture
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:43:36PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: Hi, severity 526546 serious thanks Quite rude to change the severity without notifying the reporter. At least the error message should tell what specific feature is missing from the arch rather than spew a generic unspported arch message. Sorry, I didn't intend not to notify you (I thought the BTW sould have). That said I don't believe this is RC, as LXC never was on those architectures. I will followup with upstream regarding more architecture supports, but in the meantime what's the reason not to have this in testing, for archs in which it works? Can't we leave it important for now? Thanks, Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#526546: FTBFS: #error unsupported architecture
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:23:14PM +0200, Guido Trotter wrote: On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:43:36PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: At least the error message should tell what specific feature is missing from the arch rather than spew a generic unspported arch message. Sorry, I didn't intend not to notify you (I thought the BTW sould have). That said I don't believe this is RC, as LXC never was on those architectures. right, I missed that part. So this is indeed just important. I will followup with upstream regarding more architecture supports, but in the meantime what's the reason not to have this in testing, for archs in which it works? Can't we leave it important for now? Just following upstream isn't enough - upstreams' don't neccesarily care about all the archs debian supports. For example the unshare syscall which is one of the reason's that could cause the error message, is supported on arm. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#526546: FTBFS: #error unsupported architecture
Package: lxc Version: 0.6.2-1 Severity: serious User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: eabi Your package failed to build with the following error: mkdir .libs cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src -I../../src -DLXCPATH=\/var/lib/lxc\ -DLXCBINDIR=\/usr/bin\ -DLXCLIBEXECDIR=\/usr/lib/lxc\ -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -Wall -DNETWORK_DESTROY -c create.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/create.o In file included from ../../src/lxc/lxc.h:41, from create.c:34: ../../src/lxc/namespace.h:70:5: error: #error unsupported architecture -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
