Bug#532381: -doc dependencies on haddock
Hi.
Em Ter, 2009-06-16 às 15:47 +0200, Joachim Breitner escreveu:
(...)
> Am Dienstag, den 16.06.2009, 08:40 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
> Silva:
> > Em Ter, 2009-06-09 às 00:48 +0200, Joachim Breitner escreveu:
> > (...)
> > > at the moment, if you put
> > > Depends: ${haskell:Depends}
> > > in debian/control for the -doc package stanza, dh_haskell_prep will add
> > > this line:
> > > Depends: haddock (<< 2.4.2+), haddock (>= 2.4.2)
(...)
> > I could not found where the code about this was:
> >
> > mar...@zezinho:~/codigo/debian/haskell-devscripts/haskell-devscripts$
> > grep doc $(grep -l haskell:Depends * | grep -v \.pod)
> > dh_haskell_depends:#disclaimer in the documentation and/or other
> > materials provided
(...)
> The relevant code is in dh_haskell_prep, line 60.
Thanks, sorry about that.
The new package is available at
http://debian.holoscopio.com/haskell-devscripts/ .
Good afternoon.
--
marcot
http://marcot.iaaeee.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#532381: -doc dependencies on haddock
Hi Marco,
Am Dienstag, den 16.06.2009, 08:40 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
Silva:
> Em Ter, 2009-06-09 às 00:48 +0200, Joachim Breitner escreveu:
> (...)
> > Hi,
> >
> > at the moment, if you put
> > Depends: ${haskell:Depends}
> > in debian/control for the -doc package stanza, dh_haskell_prep will add
> > this line:
> > Depends: haddock (<< 2.4.2+), haddock (>= 2.4.2)
>
> At first I could not found where the code about this was:
>
> mar...@zezinho:~/codigo/debian/haskell-devscripts/haskell-devscripts$
> grep doc $(grep -l haskell:Depends * | grep -v \.pod)
> dh_haskell_depends:#disclaimer in the documentation and/or other
> materials provided
>
> Then I tryed to reproduce it with haskell-ghc-paths, and I couldn't:
>
> mar...@zezinho:~/codigo/debian/haskell-ghc-paths/build$ tail -13
> ghc-paths-0.1.0.5/debian/control
> Package: libghc6-ghc-paths-doc
> Section: doc
> Architecture: all
> Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${haskell:Depends}
> Recommends: ghc6-doc
> Suggests: libghc6-ghc-paths-dev (= ${binary:Version})
> Description: Knowledge of GHC's installation directories; documentation
> This package provides the documentation for a library for the Haskell
> programming language.
> See http://www.haskell.org/ for more information on Haskell.
> .
> This package provides constants with the installation directories of
> the
> Glasgow Haskell Compiler.
> mar...@zezinho:~/codigo/debian/haskell-ghc-paths/build$ ar -x
> libghc6-ghc-paths-doc_0.1.0.5-1_all.deb
> mar...@zezinho:~/codigo/debian/haskell-ghc-paths/build$ tar xzf
> control.tar.gz
> mar...@zezinho:~/codigo/debian/haskell-ghc-paths/build$ grep Depends
> control
> mar...@zezinho:~/codigo/debian/haskell-ghc-paths/build$
>
> There's no dependency in the -doc generated package. Can you reproduce
> it?
strange. I did reproduce it, as can seen on
http://packages.debian.org/sid/haskell-convertible-doc.
Note that haskell-convertible does not use hlibrary.make, but rather a
debian/rules on it’s own. hlibrary.make does not call _prep or _depends
for -doc packages, which should probably be changed, once we add
sensible Recommends: or Suggests: there.
The relevant code is in dh_haskell_prep, line 60.
I hope that gets you on the right tracks.
Greetings,
Joachim
PS: Once my patch in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532760 is merged, such
issues (substvars forgotten in debian/rules) will probably turn up
earlier.
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Bug#532381: -doc dependencies on haddock
Hi.
Em Ter, 2009-06-09 às 00:48 +0200, Joachim Breitner escreveu:
(...)
> Hi,
>
> at the moment, if you put
> Depends: ${haskell:Depends}
> in debian/control for the -doc package stanza, dh_haskell_prep will add
> this line:
> Depends: haddock (<< 2.4.2+), haddock (>= 2.4.2)
At first I could not found where the code about this was:
mar...@zezinho:~/codigo/debian/haskell-devscripts/haskell-devscripts$
grep doc $(grep -l haskell:Depends * | grep -v \.pod)
dh_haskell_depends:#disclaimer in the documentation and/or other
materials provided
Then I tryed to reproduce it with haskell-ghc-paths, and I couldn't:
mar...@zezinho:~/codigo/debian/haskell-ghc-paths/build$ tail -13
ghc-paths-0.1.0.5/debian/control
Package: libghc6-ghc-paths-doc
Section: doc
Architecture: all
Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${haskell:Depends}
Recommends: ghc6-doc
Suggests: libghc6-ghc-paths-dev (= ${binary:Version})
Description: Knowledge of GHC's installation directories; documentation
This package provides the documentation for a library for the Haskell
programming language.
See http://www.haskell.org/ for more information on Haskell.
.
This package provides constants with the installation directories of
the
Glasgow Haskell Compiler.
mar...@zezinho:~/codigo/debian/haskell-ghc-paths/build$ ar -x
libghc6-ghc-paths-doc_0.1.0.5-1_all.deb
mar...@zezinho:~/codigo/debian/haskell-ghc-paths/build$ tar xzf
control.tar.gz
mar...@zezinho:~/codigo/debian/haskell-ghc-paths/build$ grep Depends
control
mar...@zezinho:~/codigo/debian/haskell-ghc-paths/build$
There's no dependency in the -doc generated package. Can you reproduce
it?
Greetings.
--
marcot
http://marcot.iaaeee.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#532381: -doc dependencies on haddock
Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 11.06.2009, 08:59 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: > > Recommending ghc-doc is probably ok. Also, recommending the -doc of any > > dependency could be useful (for the links). Bonus: Only depend on those > > that are actually linked to. > > The way I thought for doing this is searching with dpkg -S for a package > with the files linked. This would have to be done in > dh_haskell_depends, since dh_haskell_prep is called before build. One > problem of this is that dh_haskell_depends is a shell script, and > getting the links of a HTML file would be easier to do in Perl than in > shell. Do you know about some program that extract the links of a HTML > file, that could be used in dh_haskell_depends? $ LANG=C lynx -dump -listonly /usr/share/doc/libghc6-xmonad-doc/html/XMonad-ManageHook.html|head -n 10 References 1. file://localhost/usr/share/doc/libghc6-xmonad-doc/html/src/XMonad-ManageHook.html 2. file://localhost/usr/share/doc/libghc6-xmonad-doc/html/index.html 3. file://localhost/usr/share/doc/libghc6-xmonad-doc/html/doc-index.html 4. file://localhost/usr/share/doc/libghc6-xmonad-doc/html/XMonad-ManageHook.html#v%3AliftX 5. file://localhost/usr/share/doc/libghc6-xmonad-doc/html/XMonad-Core.html#t%3AX 6. file://localhost/usr/share/doc/libghc6-xmonad-doc/html/XMonad-Core.html#t%3AQuery 7. file://localhost/usr/share/doc/libghc6-xmonad-doc/html/XMonad-ManageHook.html#v%3AidHook but there might be better tools. > (...) > > A versioning is useless for Suggests, I > > think. Also, I don’t think that people will need this Suggests at all. > > I think it's good to have the -dev package as a Suggests or Recommends > in the -doc package, since the -doc is, at first, not very useful > without the -dev. What do you think about unversioned Suggests in the > -dev package? > > Suggests: libghc6-package-dev I’m fine with that, as I don’t care too much :-) Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Bug#532381: -doc dependencies on haddock
Hello.
Em Qui, 2009-06-11 às 13:09 +0200, Joachim Breitner escreveu:
(...)
> Am Mittwoch, den 10.06.2009, 15:39 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva
> > wrote:
> > what do you think is the appropriate output? I'd say there's
> > no
> > dependencies for documentation packages. I usually use:
> >
> > Recommends: ghc6-doc
> > Suggests: libghc6-package-dev (= ${binary:Version})
> >
> > Should we create a haskell:Recommends and a haskell:Suggests?
(...)
> Recommending ghc-doc is probably ok. Also, recommending the -doc of any
> dependency could be useful (for the links). Bonus: Only depend on those
> that are actually linked to.
The way I thought for doing this is searching with dpkg -S for a package
with the files linked. This would have to be done in
dh_haskell_depends, since dh_haskell_prep is called before build. One
problem of this is that dh_haskell_depends is a shell script, and
getting the links of a HTML file would be easier to do in Perl than in
shell. Do you know about some program that extract the links of a HTML
file, that could be used in dh_haskell_depends?
(...)
> A versioning is useless for Suggests, I
> think. Also, I don’t think that people will need this Suggests at all.
I think it's good to have the -dev package as a Suggests or Recommends
in the -doc package, since the -doc is, at first, not very useful
without the -dev. What do you think about unversioned Suggests in the
-dev package?
Suggests: libghc6-package-dev
Greetings.
(...)
--
marcot
http://marcot.iaaeee.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#532381: -doc dependencies on haddock
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 10.06.2009, 15:39 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva
> wrote:
> what do you think is the appropriate output? I'd say there's
> no
> dependencies for documentation packages. I usually use:
>
> Recommends: ghc6-doc
> Suggests: libghc6-package-dev (= ${binary:Version})
>
> Should we create a haskell:Recommends and a haskell:Suggests?
No Depends in any case for -doc packages.
Recommending ghc-doc is probably ok. Also, recommending the -doc of any
dependency could be useful (for the links). Bonus: Only depend on those
that are actually linked to.
Not sure about the Suggests. A versioning is useless for Suggests, I
think. Also, I don’t think that people will need this Suggests at all.
I wonder why dpkg-gencontrol doesn’t warn or err if there were substvars
defined, but not used in debian/control.
> The documentation packages use haddock to update the index pages on
> install, though this is done via the script, gen_contents_index in
> ghc6-doc. In this case shouldn't there be a real dependency on
> ghc6-doc, not just a Recommends? Also, up until recently it was the
> case that haddock packages had to be installed using the same version
> of haddock that they were built with. This has been fixed, but I'm
> unclear exactly what versions of what packages you need to have this
> fix.
Since a while, gen_contents_index is not called by the package post-inst
any more, but by a ghc6-doc trigger. This means, that the -doc packages
work just fine without ghc6-doc, you just don’t have a index over all
packages. Therefore, a Dependency is not needed any more.
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Bug#532381: -doc dependencies on haddock
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva <
mar...@holoscopio.com> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Em Ter, 2009-06-09 às 00:48 +0200, Joachim Breitner escreveu:
> > at the moment, if you put
> > Depends: ${haskell:Depends}
> > in debian/control for the -doc package stanza, dh_haskell_prep will add
> > this line:
> > Depends: haddock (<< 2.4.2+), haddock (>= 2.4.2)
> (...)
> > I think it’s not an mistake in these packages, but in haskell-devscripts,
> > and from reading the code, it just seems to be an accidental artefact.
>
> what do you think is the appropriate output? I'd say there's no
> dependencies for documentation packages. I usually use:
>
> Recommends: ghc6-doc
> Suggests: libghc6-package-dev (= ${binary:Version})
>
> Should we create a haskell:Recommends and a haskell:Suggests?
>
> Greetings.
>
The documentation packages use haddock to update the index pages on install,
though this is done via the script, gen_contents_index in ghc6-doc. In this
case shouldn't there be a real dependency on ghc6-doc, not just a
Recommends? Also, up until recently it was the case that haddock packages
had to be installed using the same version of haddock that they were built
with. This has been fixed, but I'm unclear exactly what versions of what
packages you need to have this fix.
-david
Bug#532381: -doc dependencies on haddock
Hi.
Em Ter, 2009-06-09 às 00:48 +0200, Joachim Breitner escreveu:
> at the moment, if you put
> Depends: ${haskell:Depends}
> in debian/control for the -doc package stanza, dh_haskell_prep will add
> this line:
> Depends: haddock (<< 2.4.2+), haddock (>= 2.4.2)
(...)
> I think it’s not an mistake in these packages, but in haskell-devscripts,
> and from reading the code, it just seems to be an accidental artefact.
what do you think is the appropriate output? I'd say there's no
dependencies for documentation packages. I usually use:
Recommends: ghc6-doc
Suggests: libghc6-package-dev (= ${binary:Version})
Should we create a haskell:Recommends and a haskell:Suggests?
Greetings.
--
marcot
http://marcot.iaaeee.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#532381: -doc dependencies on haddock
Hello. Em Ter, 2009-06-09 às 00:48 +0200, Joachim Breitner escreveu: > Marco, do you want to prepare a haskell-devscript release that fixes > this, or do you think that you won’t have time soon for that? I'll work on that and make a new version of haskell-devscripts. Sorry for the other one without this fix, I haven't seen this e-mail before. Please discard it. Greetings. -- marcot http://marcot.iaaeee.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#532381: -doc dependencies on haddock
Package: haskell-devscripts
Version: 0.6.15+nmu10
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
at the moment, if you put
Depends: ${haskell:Depends}
in debian/control for the -doc package stanza, dh_haskell_prep will add
this line:
Depends: haddock (<< 2.4.2+), haddock (>= 2.4.2)
This affects these packages:
Package: haskell-convertible-doc
Depends: haddock (<< 2.4.1+), haddock (>= 2.4.1)
Package: haskell-hdbc-doc
Depends: haddock (<< 2.4.1+), haddock (>= 2.4.1)
Package: haskell-hdbc-postgresql-doc
Depends: haskell-hdbc-doc (>= 2.1.0), haddock (<< 2.4.1+), haddock (>=
2.4.1)
Package: haskell-hdbc-sqlite3-doc
Depends: haddock (<< 2.4.1+), haddock (>= 2.4.1)
Package: libghc6-vty-doc
Depends: haddock (>= 0.8), haddock (<< 0.8-999)
I have done manual a binNMUs for haskell-convertible-doc, but I guess
we should fix haskell-devscripts before doing the rest.
I think it’s not an mistake in these packages, but in haskell-devscripts,
and from reading the code, it just seems to be an accidental artefact.
Marco, do you want to prepare a haskell-devscript release that fixes
this, or do you think that you won’t have time soon for that?
Thanks,
Joachim
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages haskell-devscripts depends on:
ii cdbs 0.4.56 common build system for Debian pac
ii dctrl-tools 2.13.1 Command-line tools to process Debi
ii debhelper7.2.14 helper programs for debian/rules
ii ghc6 6.10.1+dfsg1-13 GHC - the Glasgow Haskell Compilat
ii xutils-dev 1:7.4+4 X Window System utility programs f
haskell-devscripts recommends no packages.
haskell-devscripts suggests no packages.
- -- no debconf information
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkotlTMACgkQ9ijrk0dDIGy0UgCfVC7zeg58xRrc3RW+0UUG39pq
oKcAoKSJibN3GAzwxITu8XZvKfudVnNs
=mz1l
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
