Bug#533765: freej: FTBFS on ia64: amd64 assembler?

2009-06-20 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 02:08:09PM +0100, Luca Bigliardi wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 01:20 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> 
> Hi!
> 
> > It looks to me like it's trying to use amd64 assembler on ia64.
> > 
> > Note that ia64 is something totaly different than amd64.  Intel
> > also ships 64 bit processors compatible with the amd64 intruction
> > set, they call it em64t and this is atleast in any chip since
> > the core 2 duo.
> > 
> > On the other hand ia64 is a totaly different instruction set
> > that's not compitible with i386 at all.
> 
> It is probably fixed in upstream git, developers don't have an ia64
> machine to test it though. Any ideas on how to get it tested? I'd like to
> avoid a blind upload.

DD's have access to a porter box for all arches.  I assume you're not a DD,
so you'd have to ask your sponsor.


Kurt




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#533765: freej: FTBFS on ia64: amd64 assembler?

2009-06-20 Thread Luca Bigliardi
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 01:20 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:

> Hi,

Hi!

> It looks to me like it's trying to use amd64 assembler on ia64.
> 
> Note that ia64 is something totaly different than amd64.  Intel
> also ships 64 bit processors compatible with the amd64 intruction
> set, they call it em64t and this is atleast in any chip since
> the core 2 duo.
> 
> On the other hand ia64 is a totaly different instruction set
> that's not compitible with i386 at all.

It is probably fixed in upstream git, developers don't have an ia64
machine to test it though. Any ideas on how to get it tested? I'd like to
avoid a blind upload.


Thank you,


luca

-- 
Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers.
-- Leonard Brandwein

http://shammash.homelinux.org/ - http://www.artha.org/ - http://www.yue.it/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#533765: freej: FTBFS on ia64: amd64 assembler?

2009-06-20 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Source: freej
Version: 0.10git20090312-1
Severity: important

Hi,

Your package is failing to build on ia64 with the following error:
/build/buildd/freej-0.10git20090312/./src/fastmemcpy.cpp: In function 'void* 
agp_memcpy(void*, const void*, size_t)':
/build/buildd/freej-0.10git20090312/./src/fastmemcpy.cpp:199: warning: matching
constraint does not allow a register
/build/buildd/freej-0.10git20090312/./src/fastmemcpy.cpp:247: warning: matching
constraint does not allow a register
/build/buildd/freej-0.10git20090312/./src/fastmemcpy.cpp:199: warning: matching
constraint does not allow a register
constraint does not allow a register
[...]
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:118: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character 
is `/'
{standard input}:119: Error: Unknown opcode `movq (r15),%mm0'
{standard input}:120: Error: Unknown opcode `movq 8(r15),%mm1'
{standard input}:121: Error: Unknown opcode `movq 16(r15),%mm2'
{standard input}:122: Error: Unknown opcode `movq 24(r15),%mm3'
{standard input}:123: Error: Unknown opcode `movq 32(r15),%mm4'
[...]

It looks to me like it's trying to use amd64 assembler on ia64.

Note that ia64 is something totaly different than amd64.  Intel
also ships 64 bit processors compatible with the amd64 intruction
set, they call it em64t and this is atleast in any chip since
the core 2 duo.

On the other hand ia64 is a totaly different instruction set
that's not compitible with i386 at all.


Kurt




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org