Bug#535540: folder sync order is now random

2009-07-06 Thread Nicolas Dandrimont
* Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org [2009-07-05 17:18:33 +0200]:
 
 FWIW, also the mutt mailbox file generated via [mbnames] has random
 ordering which, bizarrely, does not match the syncing order (nor the
 one which would be prescribed by my syncing function). 

Hi Zack,

As a matter of fact, that's how I noticed the bug, and the patch I
posted fixes this too (as a side effect, it seems).

Cheers,
-- 
Nicolas Dandrimont

BOFH excuse #374:
It's the InterNIC's fault.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#535540: folder sync order is now random

2009-07-06 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Nicolas Dandrimont nicolas.dandrim...@crans.org [2009.07.06.1147 
+0200]:
 As a matter of fact, that's how I noticed the bug, and the patch I
 posted fixes this too (as a side effect, it seems).

I can confirm that the patch works for me. Thanks.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
it is the mark of an educated mind
 to be able to entertain a thought
 without accepting it.
-- aristoteles


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Bug#535540: folder sync order is now random

2009-07-06 Thread John Goerzen
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
 On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 08:37:26AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
 It appears that the folder sync order within a single account has
 become random. Even foldersort seems to be ignored.
 
 I confirm that, version 6.1.1.
 
 FWIW, also the mutt mailbox file generated via [mbnames] has random
 ordering which, bizarrely, does not match the syncing order (nor the
 one which would be prescribed by my syncing function). 
 
 Cheers.
 

Hey guys,

Can you try reverting patch 2e22b4123190c8ae434efb2bfb3d507694482644 and
let me know if that fixes it?  I'd like to isolate which commit caused
the problem, and revert it, rather than try to patch on top of it.

Other patches that might be culprits could be:

d69176090c4afb220df566ef5ed5e653933be45e
817c09a4607f45635a6f327cebc593e396723514
3847d0ba9d17f42cbb4ae15ea9cfb97aca2029ca
e1fb9492f84538df698d6a2f1cfa2738929ed040

Thanks,

-- John



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#535540: folder sync order is now random

2009-07-06 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach John Goerzen jgoer...@complete.org [2009.07.06.1510 +0200]:
 Can you try reverting patch
 2e22b4123190c8ae434efb2bfb3d507694482644 and let me know if that
 fixes it?  I'd like to isolate which commit caused the problem,
 and revert it, rather than try to patch on top of it.

Nope.

 d69176090c4afb220df566ef5ed5e653933be45e

Nope.

 817c09a4607f45635a6f327cebc593e396723514

Nope.

 3847d0ba9d17f42cbb4ae15ea9cfb97aca2029ca

Nope.

 e1fb9492f84538df698d6a2f1cfa2738929ed040

Reverting that one restores the order.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
the english take english for granted.
but if we explore its paradoxes,
we find that quicksand can work slowly.


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Bug#535540: folder sync order is now random

2009-07-06 Thread Nicolas Dandrimont
* John Goerzen jgoer...@complete.org [2009-07-06 08:10:45 -0500]:

 Hey guys,
 
 Can you try reverting patch 2e22b4123190c8ae434efb2bfb3d507694482644 and
 let me know if that fixes it?  I'd like to isolate which commit caused
 the problem, and revert it, rather than try to patch on top of it.
 
 Other patches that might be culprits could be:
 
 d69176090c4afb220df566ef5ed5e653933be45e
 817c09a4607f45635a6f327cebc593e396723514
 3847d0ba9d17f42cbb4ae15ea9cfb97aca2029ca
 e1fb9492f84538df698d6a2f1cfa2738929ed040
 

Reverting each one of the above patches (one by one) didn't solve the
issue.

After bisecting, the patch introducing the misbehavior is one of:

61567d0d3641bddab88911fc9e216c8f213525cf
e1fb9492f84538df698d6a2f1cfa2738929ed040
147265ac391c9feeae88ddcac5b6685c87d4a39b

Unfortunately I couldn't test the first two patches alone, because 61567d0d
introduces the use of SigListener, which is defined in 147265ac.

My patch modifies the SigListener introduced in the last commit
referenced above. How would you like to proceed?

Thanks for your work!
-- 
Nicolas Dandrimont

BOFH excuse #128:
Power Company having EMP problems with their reactor


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#535540: folder sync order is now random

2009-07-06 Thread Nicolas Dandrimont
* martin f krafft madd...@debian.org [2009-07-06 15:30:38 +0200]:

  e1fb9492f84538df698d6a2f1cfa2738929ed040
 
 Reverting that one restores the order.

Hm. I have messed something up somehow the first time, but yes,
reverting this patch removes the misbehavior.

Thanks,
-- 
Nicolas Dandrimont


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#535540: folder sync order is now random

2009-07-05 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 08:37:26AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
 It appears that the folder sync order within a single account has
 become random. Even foldersort seems to be ignored.

I confirm that, version 6.1.1.

FWIW, also the mutt mailbox file generated via [mbnames] has random
ordering which, bizarrely, does not match the syncing order (nor the
one which would be prescribed by my syncing function). 

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..|  .  |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...| ..: | Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#535540: folder sync order is now random

2009-07-03 Thread martin f krafft
Package: offlineimap
Version: 6.1.0
Severity: normal

It appears that the folder sync order within a single account has
become random. Even foldersort seems to be ignored.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-rc5-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages offlineimap depends on:
ii  python2.5.4-2An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-support1.0.3  automated rebuilding support for P

offlineimap recommends no packages.

Versions of packages offlineimap suggests:
pn  python-kerberos   none (no description available)

-- no debconf information


-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madd...@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)