Bug#536481: Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)
* Andreas Barth (a...@not.so.argh.org) [100331 14:00]: * martin f krafft (madd...@madduck.net) [100331 13:52]: also sprach Andreas Barth a...@not.so.argh.org [2010.03.31.1134 +0200]: * martin f krafft (madd...@debian.org) [100331 11:09]: Can you please trigger a rebuild of lbdb, due to #536481? why does the binnmu fix the problem? was something changed in a dependency? The bugreport unfortunatly doesn't say anything. I don't exactly know, but on the previous build, it seems that configure decided that libvformat was not available, and thus didn't compile/install m_vcf. If I recompile now, it just works. So, this means we just need to rebuild the amd64 package, version 0.36+nmu1, as specified in your bug report? Which doesn't exist, the current version in unstable is 0.36. It would really help if you tell the full information at once. Thanks. This includes (but is not limited) to the affected arches, version, package with some reasoning (like: please rebuilt the sparc-version in a clean chroot, $file is missing but available on all other architectures). Can we please have the full information in order to schedule the necessary binNMUs? Thanks. Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#536481: Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)
Hi, * martin f krafft (madd...@debian.org) [100331 11:09]: Can you please trigger a rebuild of lbdb, due to #536481? why does the binnmu fix the problem? was something changed in a dependency? The bugreport unfortunatly doesn't say anything. Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#536481: Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)
* martin f krafft (madd...@madduck.net) [100331 13:52]: also sprach Andreas Barth a...@not.so.argh.org [2010.03.31.1134 +0200]: * martin f krafft (madd...@debian.org) [100331 11:09]: Can you please trigger a rebuild of lbdb, due to #536481? why does the binnmu fix the problem? was something changed in a dependency? The bugreport unfortunatly doesn't say anything. I don't exactly know, but on the previous build, it seems that configure decided that libvformat was not available, and thus didn't compile/install m_vcf. If I recompile now, it just works. So, this means we just need to rebuild the amd64 package, version 0.36+nmu1, as specified in your bug report? Which doesn't exist, the current version in unstable is 0.36. It would really help if you tell the full information at once. Thanks. This includes (but is not limited) to the affected arches, version, package with some reasoning (like: please rebuilt the sparc-version in a clean chroot, $file is missing but available on all other architectures). Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#536481: Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)
also sprach Andreas Barth a...@not.so.argh.org [2010.03.31.1134 +0200]: * martin f krafft (madd...@debian.org) [100331 11:09]: Can you please trigger a rebuild of lbdb, due to #536481? why does the binnmu fix the problem? was something changed in a dependency? The bugreport unfortunatly doesn't say anything. I don't exactly know, but on the previous build, it seems that configure decided that libvformat was not available, and thus didn't compile/install m_vcf. If I recompile now, it just works. -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ if voting could really change things, it would be illegal. -- revolution books, new york spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net digital_signature_gpg.asc Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
