Bug#538205:
Le July 24, 2009 07:31:13 am Martin Meredith, vous avez écrit : tags 538205 +wontfix thanks Hi there! I've spoken to Derick, and he's of the same thoughts of me, that the documentation shouldn't be shipped with the package, as this is not how it's intended. The documentation is designed to be viewed on the website. Hi, one possible problem with relying on the website is that it is not versioned, so the documentation may become inexact. If the documentation isn't included in the package, one solution would be to host doc for each current version (unless they don't differ in features) on debian.org. Note that you can tag wontfix and close, but not both at the same time (at least, in theory). Tagging wontfix indicates that a valid issue will not be addressed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#538205:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 01:07:24PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: Le July 24, 2009 07:31:13 am Martin Meredith, vous avez écrit : tags 538205 +wontfix thanks Hi there! I've spoken to Derick, and he's of the same thoughts of me, that the documentation shouldn't be shipped with the package, as this is not how it's intended. The documentation is designed to be viewed on the website. Hi, one possible problem with relying on the website is that it is not versioned, so the documentation may become inexact. If the documentation isn't included in the package, one solution would be to host doc for each current version (unless they don't differ in features) on debian.org. Note that you can tag wontfix and close, but not both at the same time (at least, in theory). Tagging wontfix indicates that a valid issue will not be addressed. wontfix + closed means that it is a bug that has been resolved by deciding not to fix it. It's generally only suitable for wishlist kind of things though. -- Regards, Martin Mez Meredith signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#538205: (no subject)
reopen 538205 tags 538205 - wontfix thanks Re-opened pending further investigation -- Regards, Martin Mez Meredith -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#538205:
Le July 24, 2009 02:00:18 pm Martin Meredith, vous avez écrit : On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 01:07:24PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: Le July 24, 2009 07:31:13 am Martin Meredith, vous avez écrit : tags 538205 +wontfix thanks [...] Note that you can tag wontfix and close, but not both at the same time (at least, in theory). Tagging wontfix indicates that a valid issue will not be addressed. wontfix + closed means that it is a bug that has been resolved by deciding not to fix it. It's generally only suitable for wishlist kind of things though. Deciding not to fix a bug does not resolve it. What you wanted to do in this case it simply to tag wontfix. Note that the BTS has status tags, but no resolution tags. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#538205: [php5-xdebug] Please include documentation
Package: php5-xdebug Version: 2.0.4-2 Severity: wishlist Please include documentation for xdebug. http://xdebug.org/docs/ contains fair documentation, which however seems unlicensed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
