Bug#538655: asciidoc: unstable conversion rule for ' (2009) == worth working on that?
Hi, On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 03:12:53PM +0100, Joseph Herlant wrote: Hi Osamu, Sure I can keep the bug opened, but could you provide an example to reproduce the issue please? Just to verify there's not a built-in solution that could avoid the need of cleaning all doc. I did digging several years ago. So my memory is vague. Issue is related to the one documented in changelog for Version 8.3.0 (2008-11-29): ... 25.1. Compatibility issues Version 8.3.0 has a number of backward incompatibilities with respect to the previous 8.2.7 release: ... * The introduction of single-quote quoting requires that double-quote quoting is escaped with two backslashes. Something between ` ... ` are now not required to be escaped even for some characters like * now but we needed escape for such characters. When I find time, I will chack it. Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#538655: asciidoc: unstable conversion rule for ' (2009) == worth working on that?
Hi Osamu, Sure I can keep the bug opened, but could you provide an example to reproduce the issue please? Just to verify there's not a built-in solution that could avoid the need of cleaning all doc. Thanks in advance, Joseph On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote: Hi, Anyway, good to see new people working on asciiidoc. On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 02:54:57PM +0100, Joseph Herlant wrote: Could you give me a feedback about this please? Which bug??? Let me see ... #538655 Still this is there ... This bug is the reason why I have an old hacked copy in Debian Reference. You have a good question. I think this is ultra low priority wishlist bug. (Probably worth for wontfix tag.) I wish this bug to be kept as such so my inclusion of hacked copy of old asciidoc will not be blamed by ftpmaster as duplicate copy in package bug. I have made source update somehow but not yet ready for new grammer. It will break many pages. After jessie, you can close this as too old but please give me some time to cleanm up all documentation using it. (If you keep this as unfixed bug, I have excuse.) Regards, Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#538655: asciidoc: unstable conversion rule for ' (2009) == worth working on that?
Hi, Anyway, good to see new people working on asciiidoc. On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 02:54:57PM +0100, Joseph Herlant wrote: Could you give me a feedback about this please? Which bug??? Let me see ... #538655 Still this is there ... This bug is the reason why I have an old hacked copy in Debian Reference. You have a good question. I think this is ultra low priority wishlist bug. (Probably worth for wontfix tag.) I wish this bug to be kept as such so my inclusion of hacked copy of old asciidoc will not be blamed by ftpmaster as duplicate copy in package bug. I have made source update somehow but not yet ready for new grammer. It will break many pages. After jessie, you can close this as too old but please give me some time to cleanm up all documentation using it. (If you keep this as unfixed bug, I have excuse.) Regards, Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#538655: asciidoc: unstable conversion rule for ' (2009) == worth working on that?
Control: tags 538655 + moreinfo thanks Dear Osamu, As this bug has been created in 2009 and several versions have been released since then, do you still think this bug worth working on it? Please let me know. I'll work on that if the need is still there. Thanks in advance, Joseph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
