Bug#548508: VeraMono.ttf font should not be included in munin
Hi, On Sonntag, 27. September 2009, Tom Feiner wrote: The reason I opened this bug and not just fixed it is because I wanted a bug number to put in the patch... right! very good :) Thanks for the mentor mode explanations :) you're very welcome :) regards, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#548508: VeraMono.ttf font should not be included in munin
Package: munin Version: 1.2.6-10~lenny1 Severity: wishlist munin package ships with VeraMono.ttf as part of it. This font is provided by the ttf-dejavu package (font name: DejaVuSansMono.ttf). Instead of bundling part of a different package in munin, it should depend on ttf-dejavu, and use the font from that package. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#548508: VeraMono.ttf font should not be included in munin
I guess we can now also remove the Vera font license from the copyright file as the munin binary package doesn't ship with it - however the munin original source tar.gz does contain it. Should the copyright file remain as is or can the Vera font license be removed? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#548508: VeraMono.ttf font should not be included in munin
Committed the following patch to munin experimental: http://munin.projects.linpro.no/changeset/2490 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#548508: VeraMono.ttf font should not be included in munin
Hi Tom, On Sonntag, 27. September 2009, Tom Feiner wrote: I guess we can now also remove the Vera font license from the copyright file as the munin binary package doesn't ship with it - however the munin original source tar.gz does contain it. Should the copyright file remain as is or can the Vera font license be removed? it should remain as it is, as we ship the fonts in the source package. thanks, Holger P.S.: mentor modeThe correct severity for this bug would be normal, as Debian doesnt like code/content duplicates :) If code would be duplicated+included, the severity would be important, as the security team really doesnt like it. And for fixing stuff in your own package, you dont need to file bugs, just do it :-) That said, leave it like it is, close the bug via debian/changelog and all is excellent :-)/mentor mode signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#548508: VeraMono.ttf font should not be included in munin
severity 548508 normal thanks Holger Levsen wrote: it should remain as it is, as we ship the fonts in the source package. Thanks, I'll leave it as it. P.S.: mentor modeThe correct severity for this bug would be normal, as Debian doesnt like code/content duplicates :) If code would be duplicated+included, the severity would be important, as the security team really doesnt like it. And for fixing stuff in your own package, you dont need to file bugs, just do it :-) That said, leave it like it is, close the bug via debian/changelog and all is excellent :-)/mentor mode Right, I now that I think about it wishlist is not right for this bug. The reason I opened this bug and not just fixed it is because I wanted a bug number to put in the patch I wrote that changes the use of VeraMono.ttf to the debian shipped font, and I thought it would give a bit more context. Thanks for the mentor mode explanations :) Tom Feiner signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
