Bug#550234: imagemagick pulls by default libgtk2.0-0 and a number of its dependencies to non-X system

2009-10-24 Thread Denis Briand
retitle 550234 imagemagick pulls by default libgtk2.0-0 and a number of its 
dependencies to non-X system
reassign 550234 imagemagick
severity 550234 wishlist
#mc need imagemagick, see #534681, its an imagemagick issue, sorry
thanks 

Denis Briand


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#550234: imagemagick pulls by default libgtk2.0-0 and a number of its dependencies to non-X system

2009-10-24 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
retitle 550234 mc: downgrade imagemagick dependency to Suggests
reassign 550234 mc
severity 550234 important
thanks

Denis Briand wrote:
> retitle 550234 imagemagick pulls by default libgtk2.0-0 and a number of its 
> dependencies to non-X system
> reassign 550234 imagemagick
> severity 550234 wishlist
> #mc need imagemagick, see #534681, its an imagemagick issue, sorry
No, mc doesn't need imagemagick to work. Mc is a file manager, not an image
viewer. Please demote it to Suggests and wrote a paragraph in the long
description that one needs it to view JPEG or whatever pictures.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#550234: imagemagick pulls by default libgtk2.0-0 and a number of its dependencies to non-X system

2009-10-24 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi!

Just in case it matters, ImageMagick in experimental already has some
modules split in a new package, "removing" the dependencies on a lot
of graphical libs (including gtk). See #478538
An upload to unstable will follow soon.

Best regards,
Nelson



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#550234: imagemagick pulls by default libgtk2.0-0 and a number of its dependencies to non-X system

2009-10-24 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hi Nelson,

Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Just in case it matters, ImageMagick in experimental already has some
> modules split in a new package, "removing" the dependencies on a lot
> of graphical libs (including gtk). See #478538
> An upload to unstable will follow soon.
Good news for sure, but I still prefer Suggests for mc->imagemagick dependency.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature