Bug#554358: apt-get update segfaults on Etch, testing, on i386 and amd64
Package: apt Version: 0.7.23.1 Severity: grave Since this morning. Seen on machines running Etch, testing, both on i386 and amd64: # apt-get update Hit http://abcx.utr.xaq.nl testing Release.gpg [..] Get:11 http://abcx.utr.xaq.nl unstable/main 2009-11-04-0016.39.pdiff [5,001kB] E: Method rred has died unexpectedly! E: Sub-process rred received a segmentation fault. On Sarge and Ubuntu-8.04-LTS: no problem. R. -- ___ It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak aloud and remove all doubt. +--+ | Richard Lucassen, Utrecht| | Public key and email address:| | http://www.lucassen.org/mail-pubkey.html | +--+ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#554358: apt-get update segfaults on Etch, testing, on i386 and amd64
* richard lucassen mailingli...@lucassen.org [04-11-2009 13:14 EET]: Package: apt Version: 0.7.23.1 Severity: grave I also experience this problem on a system running testing, using 0.7.24, but only on one of my testing systems. An unstable installation had the problem earlier this morning, but it is co-operating now. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#554358: apt-get update segfaults on Etch, testing, on i386 and amd64 [notabug]
Was a corrupted diff file. Plae change to notabug -- ___ It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak aloud and remove all doubt. +--+ | Richard Lucassen, Utrecht| | Public key and email address:| | http://www.lucassen.org/mail-pubkey.html | +--+ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#554358: apt-get update segfaults on Etch, testing, on i386 and amd64 [notabug]
* richard lucassen spamt...@xaq.nl [04-11-2009 17:53 EET]: Was a corrupted diff file. Plae change to notabug I disagree because I think that rred should fail gracefully, regardless of the 'garbage' that it may receive. ...but perhaps the priority should be changed though... signature.asc Description: Digital signature
