Bug#563380: libgpgme-ruby1.8: /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/gpgme.rb:898:in `new': Unknown error code (GPGME::Error)
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 01:45:50PM +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: The version of libgpgme-ruby1.8 currently in Debian is not compatible with the version of libgpgme actually in Debian. […] This problem breaks schleuder in sid, so a fix or an updated version would be very much welcome. Ping? Should I do an NMU? Cheers, -- Jérémy Bobbio.''`. lu...@debian.org: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#563380: [DRE-maint] Bug#563380: libgpgme-ruby1.8: /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/gpgme.rb:898:in `new': Unknown error code (GPGME::Error)
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:56:47 +0100, Jérémy Bobbio lu...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 01:45:50PM +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: The version of libgpgme-ruby1.8 currently in Debian is not compatible with the version of libgpgme actually in Debian. […] This problem breaks schleuder in sid, so a fix or an updated version would be very much welcome. Ping? Should I do an NMU? Hey Jérémy! Although there are specific maintainers for ruby libraries maintained under the pkg-ruby-extras team (and libgpgme-ruby seems to be maintained by Rudi Cilibrasi cilib...@debian.org), I think that most everyone has had other team members do work on others' packages, and I suspect that one should assume a low-threshold NMU policy in general. It would be better if you joined the team and updated the package via the subversion repository, it would reduce the work on everyone in general, however I would completely understand if you didn't feel like joining yet another team, and its certainly not reasonable to ask that all users of a package be part of the maintenance team :) micah pgpl1EpQIsgkW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#563380: [DRE-maint] Bug#563380: libgpgme-ruby1.8: /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/gpgme.rb:898:in `new': Unknown error code (GPGME::Error)
Hi everybody, I apologize for my laxity. I just had my first child a few months ago and am busy at work because we just merged with our competitors and are now integrating massive software bases etc. Anyhow the upshot is that I have only had time to do an occasional upload this year and I will be slow so please do not hesitate to NMU me wherever you feel appropriate I will not be offended and I will pick up my pace and get caught up in Debian this year with more updates on weekends soon. Best regards, Rudi On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 1:33 PM, micah anderson mi...@riseup.net wrote: On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:56:47 +0100, Jérémy Bobbio lu...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 01:45:50PM +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: The version of libgpgme-ruby1.8 currently in Debian is not compatible with the version of libgpgme actually in Debian. […] This problem breaks schleuder in sid, so a fix or an updated version would be very much welcome. Ping? Should I do an NMU? Hey Jérémy! Although there are specific maintainers for ruby libraries maintained under the pkg-ruby-extras team (and libgpgme-ruby seems to be maintained by Rudi Cilibrasi cilib...@debian.org), I think that most everyone has had other team members do work on others' packages, and I suspect that one should assume a low-threshold NMU policy in general. It would be better if you joined the team and updated the package via the subversion repository, it would reduce the work on everyone in general, however I would completely understand if you didn't feel like joining yet another team, and its certainly not reasonable to ask that all users of a package be part of the maintenance team :) micah -- Git, Hg (Mercurial), and Subversion (svn) hosting over SSH http://sshcontrol.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#563380: libgpgme-ruby1.8: /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/gpgme.rb:898:in `new': Unknown error code (GPGME::Error)
Package: libgpgme-ruby1.8 Version: 1.0.6-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi! The version of libgpgme-ruby1.8 currently in Debian is not compatible with the version of libgpgme actually in Debian. Every examples shipped with the package fail like the following: @.../libgpgme-ruby1.8/examples$ ./keylist.rb /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/gpgme.rb:898:in `new': Unknown error code (GPGME::Error) from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/gpgme.rb:415:in `list_keys' from ./keylist.rb:4 I suspected an issue with like the one described on the bugtracker of ruby-gpgme [1] about a missing call to GPGME::check_version, but it looks like this is another issue. [1] http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=27203group_id=2369atid=9203 This problem breaks schleuder in sid, so a fix or an updated version would be very much welcome. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages libgpgme-ruby1.8 depends on: ii libc62.10.2-2GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgpg-error01.6-1 library for common error values an ii libgpgme11 1.2.0-1.2 GPGME - GnuPG Made Easy ii libruby1.8 1.8.7.174-3 Libraries necessary to run Ruby 1. ii ruby1.8 1.8.7.174-3 Interpreter of object-oriented scr libgpgme-ruby1.8 recommends no packages. libgpgme-ruby1.8 suggests no packages. -- no debconf information Cheers, -- Jérémy Bobbio.''`. lu...@debian.org: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
