Bug#566113: /usr/lib/utempter/utempter has wrong group and permissions
>> That should fail the build-dependency check, libutempter build-depends >> on a newer debhelper than is in lenny. > > I changed the dependency in the control file, so that only the lenny > version of debhelper was required. As the build process did not > complain, I thought that that version was sufficient. I'm away for the easter weekend and will upload an updated package monday. Cheers, Fathi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566113: /usr/lib/utempter/utempter has wrong group and permissions
Hello, On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:52:36 +0200 Julien Cristau wrote: > That should fail the build-dependency check, libutempter build-depends > on a newer debhelper than is in lenny. I changed the dependency in the control file, so that only the lenny version of debhelper was required. As the build process did not complain, I thought that that version was sufficient. Regards Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566113: /usr/lib/utempter/utempter has wrong group and permissions
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:47:19 +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote: > On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:27:34 +0200 > Julien Cristau wrote: > > > How exactly did you build the package? The packages in the archive > > have correct permissions (on all architectures)... > > I built it with "dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot", but with the > lenny version of debhelper. Maybe that is the reason? If it is, I still That should fail the build-dependency check, libutempter build-depends on a newer debhelper than is in lenny. Or maybe you used a backported version (which one)? > wonder why it works that chmod is called before chown. When I execute > these commands in the same order on the installed > /usr/lib/utempter/utempter, they definitely remove the setgid > bit from that file. > Could be a bug in fakeroot. It intercepts these calls. (I agree the package is buggy and ought to call chown before chmod; that doesn't explain what you're seeing though, AFAICT.) Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#566113: /usr/lib/utempter/utempter has wrong group and permissions
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:27:34 +0200 Julien Cristau wrote: > How exactly did you build the package? The packages in the archive > have correct permissions (on all architectures)... I built it with "dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot", but with the lenny version of debhelper. Maybe that is the reason? If it is, I still wonder why it works that chmod is called before chown. When I execute these commands in the same order on the installed /usr/lib/utempter/utempter, they definitely remove the setgid bit from that file. Regards Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566113: /usr/lib/utempter/utempter has wrong group and permissions
tag 566113 unreproducible kthxbye On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:12:37 +0100, Christoph Pleger wrote: > I downloaded your package source and used it to create the two packages for > lenny. After installing package libutempter0, the > command 'ls -l /usr/lib/utempter/utempter' shows the following: > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4848 2010-01-19 14:08 utempter > How exactly did you build the package? The packages in the archive have correct permissions (on all architectures)... Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#566113: /usr/lib/utempter/utempter has wrong group and permissions
Package: libutempter0 Version: 1.1.5-2 Hello, I downloaded your package source and used it to create the two packages for lenny. After installing package libutempter0, the command 'ls -l /usr/lib/utempter/utempter' shows the following: -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4848 2010-01-19 14:08 utempter I think that these are not the correct permissions and ownerships, but that the file must be owner root, group utmp with setgid bit set. debian/rules tells that it was the intention of the package maintainer to set ownerships and permissions like this, but that had no effect on the installed file. By the way, in debian/rules the chmod and chown commands must be called in opposite order, because chown removes the setgid bit. Regards Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
