Bug#570046: Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-15 Thread Ben Hutchings
This bug also applies to the scripts that kernel-package uses in the
generated packages.  I suspect that the //g modifiers can generally be
removed.

To see which regexps are duplicated and might not match as intended,
run:

for file in kernel/pkg/*/{post,pre}{inst,rm}; do
echo $file: ; grep -o '/.*/[a-z]*g' $file | sort | uniq -cd
done

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Humour is the best antidote to reality.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#568823: kernel-package: See Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-14 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi,

Thanks for your report. I agree that the /g modifier is a bug,
 since it shadows any attempt to use a pattern twice, and anchoring the
 patterns to the beginning is beneficial as well. One should note,
 though, that the do_bootloader variable has gone from the version of
 kernel-package in Sid and Squeeze, so the current problems you faced
 would not have been there with kernel-package generated images.

I'll leave this bug open until I modify the pattern matches in
 k-p.

Thanks again,

manoj
-- 
Rube Walker: Hey, Yogi, what time is it? Yogi Berra: You mean now?
Manoj Srivastava sriva...@acm.org http://www.golden-gryphon.com/  
4096R/C5779A1C E37E 5EC5 2A01 DA25 AD20  05B6 CF48 9438 C577 9A1C



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87iq9z4p1x@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com



Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-07 Thread paul . szabo
Dear Ben,

 kernel-package has an old version of the script templates.
 The templates used by linux-2.6 are in debian/templates/temp.image.plain.

 Where do I find that?

 apt-get source linux-2.6
 
 Sorry, am confused. Is that the same as
   apt-get install linux-source-2.6.26

 It is not.

I now tried that (not with apt-get but manually). I guess I needed the
files:

.../pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.26.orig.tar.gz
.../pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.26-21.diff.gz

(please confirm, or tell me what I messed up). After unpacking those,
I find (essentially in the diff file) the

.../linux-2.6-2.6.26/debian/templates/temp.image.plain/

directory. However, to my surprise, those files are older than those
from the kernel-package directory, for example:

diff -r /usr/share/kernel-package/pkg/image/postinst 
linux-2.6-2.6.26/debian/templates/temp.image.plain/postinst
8,10c8,10
 # Last Modified On : Wed Oct  8 00:03:41 2008
 # Last Machine Used: anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com
 # Update Count : 360
---
 # Last Modified On : Fri Sep 29 10:08:18 2006
 # Last Machine Used: glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com
 # Update Count : 357
...

Does that mean that kernel-package is in fact newer, and you should
import again then use my patches (sent previously)?

-

Should this bug somehow be given to kernel-package also (clone and
reassign?): would you be able to do that?

-

 BTW... lenny 5.0.4, with 2.6.26-21, was announced some time ago, but
 still
   
 http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=linux-2.6searchon=sourcenamessuite=stablesection=all
   http://packages.debian.org/source/lenny/linux-2.6
 show 2.6.26-19lenny2 : is that a problem?
  
 That is strange.  Perhaps you should report a bug against www.debian.org.

Would you be able to do that? (I guess should not use reportbug for
that, am not sure how.)

Thanks, Paul

Paul Szabo   p...@maths.usyd.edu.au   http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics   University of SydneyAustralia



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-07 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 10:20:13AM +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
 Dear Ben,
 
  kernel-package has an old version of the script templates.
  The templates used by linux-2.6 are in debian/templates/temp.image.plain.
 
  Where do I find that?
 
  apt-get source linux-2.6
 
 Sorry, am confused. Is that the same as
   apt-get install linux-source-2.6.26
 which would get me (and install)
   linux-source-2.6.26_2.6.26-21_all.deb
 and suggest to get/install
   kernel-package_11.015_all.deb
 ? I do not see anything about templates in either deb file,
 but see /usr/share/kernel-package/pkg/image/postinst in kernel-package.

please 2.6.26 is old, we are working in sid on 2.6.32.
 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-07 Thread maximilian attems
Dear Paul,

On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 10:02:47PM +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
 
 
 I now tried that (not with apt-get but manually). I guess I needed the
 files:
 
 .../pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.26.orig.tar.gz
 .../pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.26-21.diff.gz
 
 (please confirm, or tell me what I messed up). After unpacking those,
 I find (essentially in the diff file) the

as told in seperate mail that is outdated, as 2.6.32 is current dev.
 
 .../linux-2.6-2.6.26/debian/templates/temp.image.plain/
 
 directory. However, to my surprise, those files are older than those
 from the kernel-package directory, for example:
 
 diff -r /usr/share/kernel-package/pkg/image/postinst 
 linux-2.6-2.6.26/debian/templates/temp.image.plain/postinst
 8,10c8,10
  # Last Modified On : Wed Oct  8 00:03:41 2008
  # Last Machine Used: anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com
  # Update Count : 360
 ---
  # Last Modified On : Fri Sep 29 10:08:18 2006
  # Last Machine Used: glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com
  # Update Count : 357
 ...

well those lines have no other meanings as that they share a common
ancestor, they have been changed a lot since.
also 2.6.32 files have no longer those comments.
 
 Does that mean that kernel-package is in fact newer, and you should
 import again then use my patches (sent previously)?
 
 -
 
 Should this bug somehow be given to kernel-package also (clone and
 reassign?): would you be able to do that?

don't know kernel-package is in slow maintenance,
better have linux-2.6 fixed.
 
but saw your old patch and can do that later tomorrow.

thanks for your input.

kind regards
maks



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-07 Thread paul . szabo
Dear Maks,

 ... saw your old patch and can do that later tomorrow.

Thanks. Please also fix current Debian stable, do not make us wait until
2.6.32 trickles down.

 Should this bug somehow be given to kernel-package also (clone and
 reassign?): would you be able to do that?
 don't know kernel-package is in slow maintenance,

What does slow maintenance mean? They seem more up-to-date that
linux-2.6 in Debian stable. Anyway please arrange for kernel-package to
be fixed also.

Cheers, Paul

Paul Szabo   p...@maths.usyd.edu.au   http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics   University of SydneyAustralia



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-07 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 09:01 +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
 Dear Maks,
 
  ... saw your old patch and can do that later tomorrow.
 
 Thanks. Please also fix current Debian stable, do not make us wait until
 2.6.32 trickles down.
 
  Should this bug somehow be given to kernel-package also (clone and
  reassign?): would you be able to do that?
  don't know kernel-package is in slow maintenance,
 
 What does slow maintenance mean? They seem more up-to-date that
 linux-2.6 in Debian stable. Anyway please arrange for kernel-package to
 be fixed also.

These maintainer script templates were written by Manoj Srivastava, who
left the kernel team but still maintains kernel-package.  The script
templates in linux-2.6 and kernel-package are now two branches, and the
date headers in linux-2.6 have not been updated since they are redundant
with metadata maintained by the version control system.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
friends: People who know you well, but like you anyway.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#568823: kernel-package: See Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-07 Thread Paul Szabo
Package: kernel-package
Version: 11.015
Severity: normal
Tags: patch


Please see bug#568317 for details, particularly:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=568317#26
for explanation and
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=568317#36
for patch.

Cheers, Paul

Paul Szabo   p...@maths.usyd.edu.au   http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics   University of SydneyAustralia


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-pk03.15-svr (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages kernel-package depends on:
ii  binutils2.18.1~cvs20080103-7 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  debianutils 2.30 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  dpkg1.14.28  Debian package management system
ii  dpkg-dev1.14.28  Debian package development tools
ii  file4.26-1   Determines file type using magic
ii  gcc [c-compiler]4:4.3.2-2The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-3.4 [c-compiler 3.4.6-9  The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-4.1 [c-compiler 4.1.2-25 The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-4.3 [c-compiler 4.3.2-1.1The GNU C compiler
ii  gettext 0.17-4   GNU Internationalization utilities
ii  make3.81-5   The GNU version of the make util
ii  module-init-tools   3.4-1tools for managing Linux kernel mo
ii  perl5.10.0-19lenny2  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  po-debconf  1.0.15   manage translated Debconf template
ii  util-linux  2.13.1.1-1   Miscellaneous system utilities

Versions of packages kernel-package recommends:
ii  bzip2   1.0.5-1  high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  libc6-dev [libc-dev]2.7-18lenny2 GNU C Library: Development Librari

Versions of packages kernel-package suggests:
pn  docbook-utils none (no description available)
ii  e2fsprogs 1.41.3-1   ext2/ext3/ext4 file system utiliti
ii  initramfs-tools [linux-in 0.92o  tools for generating an initramfs
pn  libdb3-devnone (no description available)
ii  libncurses5-dev [libncurs 5.7+20081213-1 developer's libraries and docs for
pn  linux-source | kernel-sou none (no description available)
pn  xmlto none (no description available)

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-07 Thread paul . szabo
Dear Ben,

 ... the date headers in linux-2.6 have not been updated ...

I only whinged about headers; content in 2.6.26-21 is also in fact
older than kernel-package. I do not know what you may have changed for
bleeding-edge 2.6.32; and of course I want Debian stable to be updated
(now or in the near future).

Seeing your reluctance to talk to kernel-package, I now reported
Bug#568823.

Please report the issue with
http://packages.debian.org/source/lenny/linux-2.6 .

Cheers, Paul

Paul Szabo   p...@maths.usyd.edu.au   http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics   University of SydneyAustralia



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-05 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 12:10:46PM +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
 Dear Ben,
 
  kernel-package has an old version of the script templates.
  The templates used by linux-2.6 are in debian/templates/temp.image.plain.
 
 Where do I find that?

apt-get source linux-2.6

or

svn co svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/dists/trunk/linux-2.6

 I am using (working, building on) Debian lenny,
 building from linux-source-2.6.26-21.tar.bz2 . (Anyway, are not my
 suggested changes simple enough so you do not need actual patch files?)
 
Possibly... I haven't compared yet.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers. - Leonard Brandwein


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-05 Thread paul . szabo
Dear Ben,

 kernel-package has an old version of the script templates.
 The templates used by linux-2.6 are in debian/templates/temp.image.plain.

 Where do I find that?

 apt-get source linux-2.6

Sorry, am confused. Is that the same as
  apt-get install linux-source-2.6.26
which would get me (and install)
  linux-source-2.6.26_2.6.26-21_all.deb
and suggest to get/install
  kernel-package_11.015_all.deb
? I do not see anything about templates in either deb file,
but see /usr/share/kernel-package/pkg/image/postinst in kernel-package.

BTW... lenny 5.0.4, with 2.6.26-21, was announced some time ago, but
still
  
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=linux-2.6searchon=sourcenamessuite=stablesection=all
  http://packages.debian.org/source/lenny/linux-2.6
show 2.6.26-19lenny2 : is that a problem?

Thanks, Paul

Paul Szabo   p...@maths.usyd.edu.au   http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics   University of SydneyAustralia



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-04 Thread Niko Tyni
reassign 568317 linux-2.6
retitle 568317 linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo
thanks

On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 04:49:23PM +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
 This is not a bug in perl, works as documented in 'man perlretut'.

Right.

 The issue is with the /g modifier, as shown with script:

 This is bad usage in the linux-source-2.6.26 package.
 My /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-2.6.26-*.postinst file has header:

 Should I report this bug (spurious, un-needed /g) to the
 linux-source-2.6.26 package, or will you be able to re-assign, or
 otherwise let Mr Srivastava know?

Reassigning now. I see similar m//g usage in
 /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64.postinst
but you could probably follow up and explain what exactly was incorrect
about running lilo.
-- 
Niko Tyni   nt...@debian.org



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-04 Thread paul . szabo
Niko Tyni wrote:

 Reassigning now. ...

Thanks.

 ... you could probably follow up and explain what exactly was incorrect
 about running lilo.

Looking at my  /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-*.postinst files, I see in
the code reading and parsing $CONF_LOC = '/etc/kernel-img.conf':

  ...
  $do_symlink  =  if /do_symlinks\s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/ig;
  ...
  $do_bootloader   = Yes if /do_bootloader\s*=\s*(yes|true|1)\s*$/ig;
  $explicit_do_loader = YES if /do_bootloader\s*=\s*(yes|true|1)\s*$/ig;
  ...

Most of the match patterns are used once only; using /g on them is not
necessary, and is probably wasteful (though perl is fast enough to
handle such things).

The pattern /do_bootloader.../ig is used twice. The first one may match;
the second one will surely not match because of the spurious /g, thus
explicit_do_loader will never be set (and lilo not run, or run after a
question left un-answered in unattended runs of apt-get install).

---

Minor issues, while I am criticizing perl style...

These patterns are anchored at the end, should also be anchored at the
beginning (and with explicit m//) like:

  $do_symlink  =  if m/^\s*do_symlinks\s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/i;
  ...
  $image_dest  = $1  if m/^\s*image_dest\s*=\s*(\S+)\s*$/i;

I wonder about the need to use my() in a single-level script.

---

Cheers, Paul

Paul Szabo   p...@maths.usyd.edu.au   http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics   University of SydneyAustralia



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-04 Thread Ben Hutchings
The linux-image postinst is known to be in bad shape but we are slowly
cleaning it up.  If you can provide patches, that would be most helpful.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
In a hierarchy, every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-04 Thread paul . szabo
Dear Ben,

 ... If you can provide patches, that would be most helpful.

See below. I now see that the sources of these files are in package
kernel-package (I do not know how that relates to linux-2.6).
I only patched the spurious /g modifiers and cleaned up the patterns
e.g. to anchor at the beginning; did not drop the unnecessary my().

Cheers, Paul

Paul Szabo   p...@maths.usyd.edu.au   http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics   University of SydneyAustralia


--- usr/share/kernel-package/pkg/headers/postinst.bak   2008-05-02 
15:06:28.0 +1000
+++ usr/share/kernel-package/pkg/headers/postinst   2010-02-05 
10:30:23.0 +1100
@@ -146,8 +146,8 @@
   s/\#.*$//g;
   next if /^\s*$/;
 
-  $src_postinst_hook  = $1  if /src_postinst_hook\s*=\s*(\S+)/ig;
-  $header_postinst_hook   = $1  if /header_postinst_hook\s*=\s*(\S+)/ig;
+  $src_postinst_hook  = $1  if 
m/^\s*src_postinst_hook\s*=\s*(\S+)\s*$/i;
+  $header_postinst_hook   = $1  if 
m/^\s*header_postinst_hook\s*=\s*(\S+)\s*$/i;
 }
 close CONF;
 $have_conffile = Yes;
--- usr/share/kernel-package/pkg/source/postinst.bak2008-05-02 
15:06:28.0 +1000
+++ usr/share/kernel-package/pkg/source/postinst2010-02-05 
10:31:06.0 +1100
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
   s/\#.*$//g;
   next if /^\s*$/;
 
-  $src_postinst_hook   = $1  if /src_postinst_hook\s*=\s*(\S+)/ig;
+  $src_postinst_hook   = $1  if 
m/^\s*src_postinst_hook\s*=\s*(\S+)\s*$/i;
 }
 close CONF;
 $have_conffile = Yes;
--- usr/share/kernel-package/pkg/doc/postinst.bak   2008-05-02 
15:06:28.0 +1000
+++ usr/share/kernel-package/pkg/doc/postinst   2010-02-05 10:31:51.0 
+1100
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
   s/\#.*$//g;
   next if /^\s*$/;
 
-  $src_postinst_hook   = $1  if /src_postinst_hook\s*=\s*(\S+)/ig;
+  $src_postinst_hook   = $1  if 
m/^\s*src_postinst_hook\s*=\s*(\S+)\s*$/i;
 }
 close CONF;
 $have_conffile = Yes;
--- usr/share/kernel-package/pkg/image/postinst.bak 2008-11-25 
04:01:32.0 +1100
+++ usr/share/kernel-package/pkg/image/postinst 2010-02-05 10:43:59.0 
+1100
@@ -116,60 +116,60 @@
   warn Option image_in_boot is deprecated, and will go away. Use 
link_in_boot instead.\n
 if m/image_in_boot\s*=\s*/;
 
-  $do_symlink  =  if /do_symlinks\s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/ig;
-  $no_symlink  =  if /no_symlinks\s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/ig;
-  $reverse_symlink =  if /reverse_symlink\s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/ig;
-  $link_in_boot=  if /link_in_boot\s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/ig;
-  $link_in_boot=  if /image_in_boot\s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/ig;
-  $move_image  =  if /move_image\s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/ig;
-  $clobber_modules = '' if /clobber_modules\s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/ig;
-  $do_boot_enable  = '' if /do_boot_enable\s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/ig;
-  $do_bootfloppy   = '' if /do_bootfloppy\s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/ig;
-  $relative_links  = '' if /relative_links \s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/ig;
-  $do_bootloader   = '' if /do_bootloader\s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/ig;
-  $do_initrd   = '' if /do_initrd\s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/ig;
-  $warn_initrd = '' if /warn_initrd\s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/ig;
-  $use_hard_links  = '' if /use_hard_links\s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/ig;
-  $silent_modules  = '' if /silent_modules\s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/ig;
-  $silent_loader   = '' if /silent_loader\s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/ig;
-  $warn_reboot = '' if /warn_reboot\s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/ig;
-  $minimal_swap= '' if /minimal_swap\s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/ig;
-  $ignore_depmod_err = '' if /ignore_depmod_err\s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/ig;
-  $relink_src_link   = '' if /relink_src_link\s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/ig;
-  $relink_build_link = '' if /relink_build_link\s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/ig;
-  $force_build_link  = '' if /force_build_link\s*=\s*(no|false|0)\s*$/ig;
-
-  $do_symlink  = Yes if /do_symlinks\s*=\s*(yes|true|1)\s*$/ig;
-  $no_symlink  = Yes if /no_symlinks\s*=\s*(yes|true|1)\s*$/ig;
-  $reverse_symlink = Yes if /reverse_symlinks\s*=\s*(yes|true|1)\s*$/ig;
-  $link_in_boot= Yes if /link_in_boot\s*=\s*(yes|true|1)\s*$/ig;
-  $link_in_boot= Yes if /image_in_boot\s*=\s*(yes|true|1)\s*$/ig;
-  $move_image  = Yes if /move_image\s*=\s*(yes|true|1)\s*$/ig;
-  $clobber_modules = Yes if /clobber_modules\s*=\s*(yes|true|1)\s*$/ig;
-  $do_boot_enable  = Yes if /do_boot_enable\s*=\s*(yes|true|1)\s*$/ig;
-  $do_bootfloppy   = Yes if /do_bootfloppy\s*=\s*(yes|true|1)\s*$/ig;
-  $do_bootloader   = Yes if /do_bootloader\s*=\s*(yes|true|1)\s*$/ig;
-  $explicit_do_loader = YES if /do_bootloader\s*=\s*(yes|true|1)\s*$/ig;
-  $relative_links  = Yes if /relative_links\s*=\s*(yes|true|1)\s*$/ig;
-  $do_initrd   = Yes if /do_initrd\s*=\s*(yes|true|1)\s*$/ig;
-  $warn_initrd = Yes if 

Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-04 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 10:54:33AM +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
 Dear Ben,
 
  ... If you can provide patches, that would be most helpful.
 
 See below. I now see that the sources of these files are in package
 kernel-package (I do not know how that relates to linux-2.6).
 I only patched the spurious /g modifiers and cleaned up the patterns
 e.g. to anchor at the beginning; did not drop the unnecessary my().
[...]

kernel-package has an old version of the script templates.
The templates used by linux-2.6 are in debian/templates/temp.image.plain.

Ben.
-- 
Ben Hutchings
In a hierarchy, every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-04 Thread paul . szabo
Dear Ben,

 kernel-package has an old version of the script templates.
 The templates used by linux-2.6 are in debian/templates/temp.image.plain.

Where do I find that? I am using (working, building on) Debian lenny,
building from linux-source-2.6.26-21.tar.bz2 . (Anyway, are not my
suggested changes simple enough so you do not need actual patch files?)

Thanks, Paul

Paul Szabo   p...@maths.usyd.edu.au   http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics   University of SydneyAustralia



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org