Bug#568475: keyboard-configuration: Please use pc104 for *_PL.
Anton Zinoviev : > On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 02:19:24AM +0100, Piotr Engelking wrote: > >> As of version 1.51, keyboard-configuration uses pc105 as the default >> keyboard model for *_PL locales. Please use pc104 instead, as this the >> keyboard that is normally used in Poland. > > True, but pc104 works only for people having a pc104 keyboard while > pc105 works for both. Currently, keyboard-configuration defaults to pc104 for the Brazilian and US layouts. Shouldn't they perhaps be changed to pc105 as well, in the light of the above? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#568475: keyboard-configuration: Please use pc104 for *_PL.
reopen 568475 retitle 568475 No need to use pc104 for Brazilian and US layouts thank you On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 08:06:26PM +0100, Piotr Engelking wrote: > > Currently, keyboard-configuration defaults to pc104 for the Brazilian > and US layouts. Shouldn't they perhaps be changed to pc105 as well, in > the light of the above? Yes. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#568475: keyboard-configuration: Please use pc104 for *_PL.
Package: keyboard-configuration Version: 1.51 Severity: normal Tags: l10n As of version 1.51, keyboard-configuration uses pc105 as the default keyboard model for *_PL locales. Please use pc104 instead, as this the keyboard that is normally used in Poland. Reference: http://www.microsoft.com/resources/msdn/goglobal/keyboards/kbdpl1.htm -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (400, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages keyboard-configuration depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.28 Debian configuration management sy keyboard-configuration recommends no packages. keyboard-configuration suggests no packages. -- debconf information: keyboard-configuration/layout: * keyboard-configuration/variant: Poland keyboard-configuration/unsupported_options: true keyboard-configuration/optionscode: lv3:ralt_switch,compose:menu keyboard-configuration/modelcode: samsung4500 keyboard-configuration/unsupported_config_options: true keyboard-configuration/toggle: No toggling * keyboard-configuration/altgr: Right Alt (AltGr) keyboard-configuration/unsupported_layout: true keyboard-configuration/layoutcode: pl debian-installer/console-setup-udeb/title: * keyboard-configuration/ctrl_alt_bksp: false keyboard-configuration/variantcode: keyboard-configuration/other: keyboard-configuration/unsupported_config_layout: true * keyboard-configuration/compose: Menu key keyboard-configuration/switch: No temporary switch * keyboard-configuration/model: Samsung SDM 4500P -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#568475: keyboard-configuration: Please use pc104 for *_PL.
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 02:19:24AM +0100, Piotr Engelking wrote: > > As of version 1.51, keyboard-configuration uses pc105 as the default > keyboard model for *_PL locales. Please use pc104 instead, as this the > keyboard that is normally used in Poland. True, but pc104 works only for people having a pc104 keyboard while pc105 works for both. Is there something that doesn't work properly with XKBMODEL="pc105" (other than printing the keyboard layout)? Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#568475: keyboard-configuration: Please use pc104 for *_PL.
Anton Zinoviev : > True, but pc104 works only for people having a pc104 keyboard while > pc105 works for both. Why is there a distinction, then? Couldn't they be unified? > Is there something that doesn't work properly with XKBMODEL="pc105" > (other than printing the keyboard layout)? No, with the Polish layout I see no difference when switching XKBMODEL between pc104 and pc105. I tested all non-alphanumeric keys, with and without shift. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
