Bug#570964: [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#570964: FTBFS: hGetContents: invalid argument
Hi, Am Montag, den 22.02.2010, 15:05 +0100 schrieb Cyril Brulebois: Source: highlighting-kate your package FTBFS: | Running hscolour for highlighting-kate-0.2.5... | HsColour: Text/Highlighting/Kate/Syntax/D.hs: hGetContents: invalid argument (invalid UTF-8 byte sequence) | make: *** [build-haddock-stamp] Error 1 Full build logs: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?suite=unstablep=highlighting-kate Please note that I tried several builds, including with uptodate hscolour (and I saw #570937, the give-back led to the same results as for the previous attempts). It seems that in this case, there really are invalid UTF-8-Bytesequences in the file, sourceful upload is pending. (I hope my computer handles the build on i386, otherwise I’ll have to ask marco to build it.) (I presume that in the other cases, where 1.16 fixed it, the error message came because of double decoding or something like that before). Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim nomeata Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Bug#570964: [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#570964: FTBFS: hGetContents: invalid argument
Hi, Am Montag, den 22.02.2010, 15:34 +0100 schrieb Cyril Brulebois: Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org (22/02/2010): (I hope my computer handles the build on i386, otherwise I’ll have to ask marco to build it.) Let me know if I can upload something for you. Thanks for the offer. On i386 I could build it fine (on amd64, it was using too much memory – one of the disadvantages of 64. What were the advantages again? Nevermind ;-)) (I presume that in the other cases, where 1.16 fixed it, the error message came because of double decoding or something like that before). Okay. This also means that if the error happens again with 1.16, please file a FTBFS bugreport, as it requires a sourceful upload to fix it. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim nomeata Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Bug#570964: [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#570964: FTBFS: hGetContents: invalid argument
Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org (22/02/2010): (I hope my computer handles the build on i386, otherwise I’ll have to ask marco to build it.) Let me know if I can upload something for you. (I presume that in the other cases, where 1.16 fixed it, the error message came because of double decoding or something like that before). Okay. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#570964: [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#570964: FTBFS: hGetContents: invalid argument
+++ Joachim Breitner [Feb 22 10 15:24 ]: Hi, Am Montag, den 22.02.2010, 15:05 +0100 schrieb Cyril Brulebois: Source: highlighting-kate your package FTBFS: | Running hscolour for highlighting-kate-0.2.5... | HsColour: Text/Highlighting/Kate/Syntax/D.hs: hGetContents: invalid argument (invalid UTF-8 byte sequence) | make: *** [build-haddock-stamp] Error 1 (Upstream developer here:) I think I see the root of the problem. highlighting-kate's syntax highlighting modules are generated programmatically from kate xml language definitions. I updated highlighting-kate's own modules for compatibility with GHC 6.12 (where you can't use System.IO.UTF8 or you'll get double decoding/encoding), but I forgot to update the program that writes the modules for particular languages. So these source files are not themselves properly encoded. I will fix this and upload a new version to HackageDB today if I can. John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#570964: [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#570964: FTBFS: hGetContents: invalid argument
+++ John MacFarlane [Feb 22 10 09:14 ]: +++ Joachim Breitner [Feb 22 10 15:24 ]: Hi, Am Montag, den 22.02.2010, 15:05 +0100 schrieb Cyril Brulebois: Source: highlighting-kate your package FTBFS: | Running hscolour for highlighting-kate-0.2.5... | HsColour: Text/Highlighting/Kate/Syntax/D.hs: hGetContents: invalid argument (invalid UTF-8 byte sequence) | make: *** [build-haddock-stamp] Error 1 (Upstream developer here:) I think I see the root of the problem. highlighting-kate's syntax highlighting modules are generated programmatically from kate xml language definitions. I updated highlighting-kate's own modules for compatibility with GHC 6.12 (where you can't use System.IO.UTF8 or you'll get double decoding/encoding), but I forgot to update the program that writes the modules for particular languages. So these source files are not themselves properly encoded. On further investigation: the source files in the current Hackage package (0.2.6) do seem to be properly encoded. (I generated them on a machine running ghc 6.10.4.) So I am not sure what the problem is with the D.hs module... John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
