Hi. Le jeudi 05 août 2010 à 23:35 -0700, Dave Beckett a écrit : > Raptor includes librdfa at the source level but by macros and ifdefs, > compiles a different binary to directly link in librdfa into it's library. > There's no way a separate librdfa could be called.
Uh... you mean, that there's no way absolutely, for all eternity ? Or it could be possible, provided that raptor tools would be changed (and maybe all apps depending on libraptor) ? I'm afraid I either didn't understand the technical aspects of your answer, or have missed an obvious point. Btw, the author of librdfa seems to be providing an unofficial package for Debian. Now, consider the situation when eventually someday this package makes it way to Debian : then there would be a situation agains policy, as there may be two copies of that same lib running in different apps on a Debian system, with, for instance, security fixes not applied in all copies :-( ... Please don't take offense, I'm nor arguing against the quality of the libs, but just envisioning a classical situation for which a distro policy is supposed to mandate "the right thing" to do. Could you elaborate your answer a bit more so I can fully understand ? Thanks for caring. Best regards, -- Olivier BERGER <olivier.ber...@it-sudparis.eu> http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8 Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF Institut TELECOM, SudParis (http://www.it-sudparis.eu/), Evry (France) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
