Bug#587460: snmpd should not bind to localhost by default

2011-08-26 Thread Jochen Friedrich

Hi Marco,


Are there any news?

On Jun 28, Marco d'Itri  wrote:


Package: snmpd

On Jun 28, Jochen Friedrich  wrote:


What is the point? Who installs snmpd to only use it locally?

snmpd might be installed by a dependency, e.g. by quagga.

I don't think so. quagga only suggests snmpd, so it cannot be installed
by mistake. The list of packages Recommending or Depending on snmpd is
very short and they look reasonable.
How did you come to conclude that more people install snmpd by mistake
than because they actually want to use it?
Daemons should be installed with the configuration which would be useful
for the largest number of users.

--
ciao,
Marco


I aggree that the bind to 127.0.0.1 can finally disappear in 
/etc/default/net-snmp as this bind is now done in the sample snmpd.conf 
shipped by upstream.


However, I still believe that there shouldn't be any unconfigured snmpd 
deamons reachable from outside. You need to specify at least a basic set 
of ACLs or even better some user name and sign / encryption password for 
access of SNMP MIBs.


Thanks,
Jochen



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#587460: snmpd should not bind to localhost by default

2011-08-26 Thread Marco d'Itri
Are there any news?

On Jun 28, Marco d'Itri  wrote:

> Package: snmpd
> 
> On Jun 28, Jochen Friedrich  wrote:
> 
> >> What is the point? Who installs snmpd to only use it locally?
> > snmpd might be installed by a dependency, e.g. by quagga.
> I don't think so. quagga only suggests snmpd, so it cannot be installed
> by mistake. The list of packages Recommending or Depending on snmpd is
> very short and they look reasonable.
> How did you come to conclude that more people install snmpd by mistake
> than because they actually want to use it?
> Daemons should be installed with the configuration which would be useful
> for the largest number of users.
> 
> -- 
> ciao,
> Marco
> 
> 
> 

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#587460: snmpd should not bind to localhost by default

2010-06-28 Thread Marco d'Itri
Package: snmpd

On Jun 28, Jochen Friedrich  wrote:

>> What is the point? Who installs snmpd to only use it locally?
> snmpd might be installed by a dependency, e.g. by quagga.
I don't think so. quagga only suggests snmpd, so it cannot be installed
by mistake. The list of packages Recommending or Depending on snmpd is
very short and they look reasonable.
How did you come to conclude that more people install snmpd by mistake
than because they actually want to use it?
Daemons should be installed with the configuration which would be useful
for the largest number of users.

-- 
ciao,
Marco



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org