Bug#591417: ziproxy: diff for NMU version 3.1.1-1.1
* Marcos Talau ta...@users.sourceforge.net [2010-08-14 15:27]: The BUG related on armel was already correct solved [1]. I don't think disabling some option is the best fix. I searched around and found http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36466 which explains why the code in ziproxy is buggy. If you forward this link to upstream, maybe they can fix it. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#591417: ziproxy: diff for NMU version 3.1.1-1.1
Upstream said: The offending piece of code was identified. However the code, due to its non-POSIX implementation, is non-functional under current versions of GLIBC, regardless the bug. Squid has a similar kludge but, apparently, they managed to keep it working. A portable solution is being investigated, but there's a real possibility NameServers functionality will be removed. In the meantime, for the affected OSes, I suggest disabing the code and issuing a warning if that option is enabled by the user. pgpPRQIz7O57V.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#591417: ziproxy: diff for NMU version 3.1.1-1.1
On 08/16/2010 01:23 AM, Marcos Talau wrote: Upstream said: The offending piece of code was identified. However the code, due to its non-POSIX implementation, is non-functional under current versions of GLIBC, regardless the bug. Squid has a similar kludge but, apparently, they managed to keep it working. A portable solution is being investigated, but there's a real possibility NameServers functionality will be removed. In the meantime, for the affected OSes, I suggest disabing the code and issuing a warning if that option is enabled by the user. Could you provide a patch that issues a warning when the NameServers functionnality is used? I'm still undecided on what I should do with my NMU. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#591417: ziproxy: diff for NMU version 3.1.1-1.1
tags 591417 + patch tags 591417 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for ziproxy (versioned as 3.1.1-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- Mehdi Dogguy diff -Nru ziproxy-3.1.1/debian/changelog ziproxy-3.1.1/debian/changelog --- ziproxy-3.1.1/debian/changelog 2010-06-26 04:19:59.0 +0200 +++ ziproxy-3.1.1/debian/changelog 2010-08-14 18:49:32.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +ziproxy (3.1.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Disable optimizations on arm* (Closes: #591417). + + -- Mehdi Dogguy me...@debian.org Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:23:12 + + ziproxy (3.1.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release (Closes: #587039) [CVE-2010-2350] diff -Nru ziproxy-3.1.1/debian/rules ziproxy-3.1.1/debian/rules --- ziproxy-3.1.1/debian/rules 2010-06-26 02:53:29.0 +0200 +++ ziproxy-3.1.1/debian/rules 2010-08-14 18:48:25.0 +0200 @@ -1,5 +1,10 @@ #!/usr/bin/make -f +# Hack to workaround a GCC bug on arm* +ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU), arm) +CFLAGS += -O0 +endif + %: dh $@ --with autotools_dev
Bug#591417: ziproxy: diff for NMU version 3.1.1-1.1
Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org writes: I've prepared an NMU for ziproxy (versioned as 3.1.1-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Thanks for your work. The BUG related on armel was already correct solved [1]. The version 3.1.3-1 also closes others BUGS. I asked in mentors-list for help in an upload [2]. Can you sponsor this package? 1. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/ziproxy/ziproxy_3.1.3-1.dsc 2. http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2010/08/msg00095.html Regards, Talau pgp2krzqorElu.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#591417: ziproxy: diff for NMU version 3.1.1-1.1
On 08/14/2010 08:27 PM, Marcos Talau wrote: Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org writes: I've prepared an NMU for ziproxy (versioned as 3.1.1-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Thanks for your work. The BUG related on armel was already correct solved [1]. Uh... Please show some reaction on the bug next time (and sync your Git repository). Your dsc looks ok for me but please replace Really closes .* BUG with appropriate closes statement, even if they are already closed. Once that fixed, ping me and I'll sponsor this upload. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
