Bug#591886: doc-rfc: lost RFCs in changed packaging scheme
severity 591886 minor retitle 591886 RFC 17a lost in changed packaging scheme thanks On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 07:39:23PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: > On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:03:47AM -0400, Iustin Pop wrote: > > I've dropped intentionally the non-issues RFCs from the packaging, as > > rfc-editor doesn't provide any content for them, and they are marked as > > such in rfc-index.txt. > > I'm sorry, I tested for virtually everything I thought about, even for > zero-length files, but not for content like "RFC x was never issued." > > However, I did this now, and... > > > Did you see any real RFCs missing? > > One of them at least contains more than the above content :) > > usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc17a.txt Yes, I know about that RFC and its special naming, but I thought it was not provided anymore. I see now that it is, and that I missed it. Sorry! I'm marking the bug as minor (this is just one very old RFC), and will fix it with the next upstream release probably, as the size of the packages is big enough that I don't think a new upload just for this bug is warranted. thanks! iustin signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#591886: doc-rfc: lost RFCs in changed packaging scheme
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:03:47AM -0400, Iustin Pop wrote: > I've dropped intentionally the non-issues RFCs from the packaging, as > rfc-editor doesn't provide any content for them, and they are marked as > such in rfc-index.txt. I'm sorry, I tested for virtually everything I thought about, even for zero-length files, but not for content like "RFC x was never issued." However, I did this now, and... > Did you see any real RFCs missing? One of them at least contains more than the above content :) usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc17a.txt regards Mario -- Why did the tachyon cross the road? Because it was on the other side. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#591886: doc-rfc: lost RFCs in changed packaging scheme
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 09:26:44AM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: > Package: doc-rfc > Version: 20100731-1 > > Hello, > > after purging the old numeric doc-rfc packages and upgrading (and > installing) the new ones I noticed there are some RFCs from the old > packages not shipped anymore with the new ones. > > Attached you'll find a list of RFCs from the numeric packages that are > not available anymore in the new packages. I've tested around 10 of the RFCs you posted and none of them are real RFCs. All are: 1839 Not Issued. 1840 Not Issued. I've dropped intentionally the non-issues RFCs from the packaging, as rfc-editor doesn't provide any content for them, and they are marked as such in rfc-index.txt. Did you see any real RFCs missing? regards, iustin signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#591886: doc-rfc: lost RFCs in changed packaging scheme
Package: doc-rfc Version: 20100731-1 Hello, after purging the old numeric doc-rfc packages and upgrading (and installing) the new ones I noticed there are some RFCs from the old packages not shipped anymore with the new ones. Attached you'll find a list of RFCs from the numeric packages that are not available anymore in the new packages. Thanks for your work & best regards Mario -- If her DNA was off by one percentage point, she'd be a dolphin. -- Dr. Gregory House usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc259.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc541.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc428.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc341.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc484.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc159.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc646.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc693.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc650.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc92.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc14.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc668.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc572.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc397.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc715.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc665.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc664.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc507.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc244.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc648.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc639.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc277.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc358.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc201.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc554.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc605.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc380.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc536.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc558.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc444.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc284.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc220.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc723.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc670.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc673.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc710.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc261.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc517.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc262.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc583.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc564.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc853.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc427.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc502.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc275.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc676.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc575.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc17a.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc709.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc682.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc649.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc641.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc272.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc258.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc375.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc257.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc26.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc540.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc383.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc424.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc337.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc711.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc248.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc481.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc260.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc465.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc279.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc1840.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc1182.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc1260.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc1061.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc1839.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc3200.txt usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc3100.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
